netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Cc: "razor@blackwall.org" <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>,
	"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"jv@jvosburgh.net" <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
	"jarod@redhat.com" <jarod@redhat.com>,
	Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"steffen.klassert@secunet.com" <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net 1/3] bonding: move IPsec deletion to bond_ipsec_free_sa
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 13:29:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8mjLEx37F-zaE0i@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8lysOLMnYoknLsW@fedora>

On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 10:02:34AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > Set xs->xso.real_dev = NULL is a good idea. As we will break
> > in bond_ipsec_del_sa()/bond_ipsec_free_sa() when there is no
> > xs->xso.real_dev.
> > 
> > For bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(), I will move the xso.real_dev = real_dev
> > after .xdo_dev_state_add() in case the following situation.
> > 
> Hmm, do we still need to the spin_lock in bond_ipsec_add_sa_all()? With
> xs->xso.real_dev = NULL after bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(), it looks there is
> no need the spin_lock in bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(). e.g.
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 04b677d0c45b..3ada51c63207 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -537,15 +537,27 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
>  	}
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
> +		spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> +		/* Skip dead xfrm states, they'll be freed later. */
> +		if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD) {
> +			spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
>  		/* If new state is added before ipsec_lock acquired */
> -		if (ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev == real_dev)
> +		if (ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev == real_dev) {
> +			spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
>  			continue;
> +		}
>  
> -		ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
>  		if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(ipsec->xs, NULL)) {
>  			slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: failed to add SA\n", __func__);
>  			ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
>  		}
> +		/* Set real_dev after .xdo_dev_state_add in case
> +		 * __xfrm_state_delete() is called in parallel
> +		 */
> +		ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
>  	}

OK, please ignore this, the .xdo_dev_state_add() need xso.real_dev to
be set first. Then I'm still wonder how to avoid the race before
.xdo_dev_state_add() is called, e.g.

 bond_ipsec_add_sa_all()
 spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
 ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
 spin_unlock(&ipsec->x->lock);
                                            __xfrm_state_delete
                                               - bond_ipsec_del_sa()
                                                 - .xdo_dev_state_delete()
					       - bond_ipsec_free_sa()
					         - .xdo_dev_state_free()
 .xdo_dev_state_add()

Thanks
Hangbin

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-06 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04 13:11 [PATCHv4 net 0/3] bond: fix xfrm offload issues Hangbin Liu
2025-03-04 13:11 ` [PATCHv4 net 1/3] bonding: move IPsec deletion to bond_ipsec_free_sa Hangbin Liu
2025-03-05  8:38   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-03-05 14:13     ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-05 16:12       ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-06  9:37         ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 10:02           ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 13:29             ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-03-06 13:37             ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-07  2:39               ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 13:04         ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-04 13:11 ` [PATCHv4 net 2/3] bonding: fix xfrm offload feature setup on active-backup mode Hangbin Liu
2025-03-04 13:11 ` [PATCHv4 net 3/3] selftests: bonding: add ipsec offload test Hangbin Liu
2025-03-05 10:13   ` Petr Machata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8mjLEx37F-zaE0i@fedora \
    --to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).