From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hamradio: use netdev_lockdep_set_classes() helper
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 11:36:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8tK0GARvTnW3sdd@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250307160358.3153859-1-edumazet@google.com>
On 03/07, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> It is time to use netdev_lockdep_set_classes() in bpqether.c
>
> List of related commits:
>
> 0bef512012b1 ("net: add netdev_lockdep_set_classes() to virtual drivers")
> c74e1039912e ("net: bridge: use netdev_lockdep_set_classes()")
> 9a3c93af5491 ("vlan: use netdev_lockdep_set_classes()")
> 0d7dd798fd89 ("net: ipvlan: call netdev_lockdep_set_classes()")
> 24ffd752007f ("net: macvlan: call netdev_lockdep_set_classes()")
> 78e7a2ae8727 ("net: vrf: call netdev_lockdep_set_classes()")
> d3fff6c443fe ("net: add netdev_lockdep_set_classes() helper")
>
> syzbot reported:
>
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> 6.14.0-rc5-syzkaller-01064-g2525e16a2bae #0 Not tainted
>
> dhcpcd/5501 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff8880797e2d28 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2765 [inline]
> ffff8880797e2d28 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: register_netdevice+0x12d8/0x1b70 net/core/dev.c:11008
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff88802e530d28 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2765 [inline]
> ffff88802e530d28 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/linux/netdevice.h:2804 [inline]
> ffff88802e530d28 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_change_flags+0x120/0x270 net/core/dev_api.c:65
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0
> ----
> lock(&dev->lock);
> lock(&dev->lock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
> 2 locks held by dhcpcd/5501:
> #0: ffffffff8fed6848 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_net_lock include/linux/rtnetlink.h:130 [inline]
> #0: ffffffff8fed6848 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: devinet_ioctl+0x34c/0x1d80 net/ipv4/devinet.c:1121
> #1: ffff88802e530d28 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2765 [inline]
> #1: ffff88802e530d28 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/linux/netdevice.h:2804 [inline]
> #1: ffff88802e530d28 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_change_flags+0x120/0x270 net/core/dev_api.c:65
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5501 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.14.0-rc5-syzkaller-01064-g2525e16a2bae #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
> print_deadlock_bug+0x483/0x620 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3039
> check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3091 [inline]
> validate_chain+0x15e2/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3893
> __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228
> lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x19c/0x1010 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730
> netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2765 [inline]
> register_netdevice+0x12d8/0x1b70 net/core/dev.c:11008
> bpq_new_device drivers/net/hamradio/bpqether.c:499 [inline]
> bpq_device_event+0x4b1/0x8d0 drivers/net/hamradio/bpqether.c:542
> notifier_call_chain+0x1a5/0x3f0 kernel/notifier.c:85
> __dev_notify_flags+0x207/0x400
> netif_change_flags+0xf0/0x1a0 net/core/dev.c:9442
> dev_change_flags+0x146/0x270 net/core/dev_api.c:66
> devinet_ioctl+0xea2/0x1d80 net/ipv4/devinet.c:1200
> inet_ioctl+0x3d7/0x4f0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:1001
> sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1190
> sock_ioctl+0x626/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1309
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> Fixes: 7e4d784f5810 ("net: hold netdev instance lock during rtnetlink operations")
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-07 16:03 [PATCH net-next] hamradio: use netdev_lockdep_set_classes() helper Eric Dumazet
2025-03-07 19:36 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-03-08 17:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8tK0GARvTnW3sdd@mini-arch \
--to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).