Re: [net v1] devlink: fix xa_alloc_cyclic error handling

[Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 02:49:43PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:16:55AM +0100, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:42:13PM +0100, Pierre Riteau wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 12:56, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2/14/25 2:58 PM, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:44:49PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:24:53PM +0100, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > > > >>> Pierre Riteau <pierre@stackhpc.com> found suspicious handling an error
> > > > >>> from xa_alloc_cyclic() in scheduler code [1]. The same is done in
> > > > >>> devlink_rel_alloc().
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If the same bug exists twice it might exist more times. Did you find
> > > > >> this instance by searching the whole tree? Or just networking?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This is also something which would be good to have the static
> > > > >> analysers check for. I wounder if smatch can check this?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>      Andrew
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > You are right, I checked only net folder and there are two usage like
> > > > > that in drivers. I will send v2 with wider fixing, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > While at that, please add the suitable fixes tag(s).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Paolo
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I haven't seen a v2 patch from Michal Swiatkowski. Would it be okay to
> > > at least merge this net/devlink/core.c fix for inclusion in 6.14? I
> > > can send a revised patch adding the Fixes tag. Driver fixes could be
> > > addressed separately.
> > > 
> > 
> > Sorry that I didn't send v2, but I have seen that Dan wrote to Jiri
> > about this code and also found more places to fix. I assumed that he
> > will send a fix for all cases that he found.
> > 
> > Dan, do you plan to send it or I should send v2?
> 
> Sorry, no I didn't realize anyone was waiting for me on this.  Could
> you send it?
> 

Sure, I will do it. Thanks for clarification.

> regards,
> dan carpenter
>