From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [78.32.30.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 042BB19ADB0 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.32.30.218 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741853605; cv=none; b=hMSvyyy4lVM4krVDZ7XyTvKubcnp6vKU8tnfmuG9B/7oBFIu7eAjJCmCEcNmN4YgIFH/9xSsSaHADJYqmLfkrWj596p1iv7zzZ5vujquhlOO0YA8+lTlVKFgdFCxojY0vrhpkBLCSS8xhaUT+Zdi9YazU7o3oRrV0h85T6Cu8u4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741853605; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s8ApOPtTYU42vM8XoeO+oeWY78ozR9TZyZDlZ9iMGEU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XSB0S8WZNzbAhDkzsiBteI0WFk/ZvRRRQKMsNISvcTunsyE5uEWP2vcaaNpiorxnaaHvbbFjlG8SgBrEtIfFBCu7DbkgSfDKMLlwjPAfjrLWq38YffI4kCw2FR9IyWqG1+CX4VeCgBmrdfzzgTtCdD+QDewYPG3lFAtSUJ4gX4c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b=Y8K6rmu/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.32.30.218 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="Y8K6rmu/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KNWRjxoA9JsYQRCUVG8bkf0reIJyoWkhEVKiEfrJEN4=; b=Y8K6rmu/SDHkEIdnY6m360zt81 8kzPwsNJQ4rc5IACAg6B5ZDIV5DFMtvgcp7InuiR5xaNzbzQiiXN7ZGThD8agyyGt35Rg7S7bl3ZI jvkMah64c+1BwKawt0hM12P7VXqqjbSgvWRzOTygixRoM/83PLiORN5nYX15gO0gROoDaNH9GMcUr oEk4oT0grTn5KIxWUEQVn3SDrCEXbCU0sK8a7BOBD7VWB6PKcsz7JSXW8gA6Xva1qsUzaZ6GqdpmM /7e1ry+fVNsDUGSRYMVzkgqNYl97VhCmWX9AR1xZihatto/Vd+hhFSSxJxUS2DQvYKTcpx52dr9TG 6QyXQYGQ==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:56136) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tsdge-0006fC-1T; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:13:04 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tsdgZ-0005QW-1c; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:12:59 +0000 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:12:59 +0000 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Alexandre Torgue , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Maxime Coquelin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: avoid unnecessary work in stmmac_release()/stmmac_dvr_remove() Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Russell King (Oracle) On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:31:32PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > Hi, > > This small series is a subset of a RFC I sent earlier. These two > patches remove code that is unnecessary and/or wrong in these paths. > Details in each commit. > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) Hi Jakub, Why is this series showing in patchwork, but not being subjected to any nipabot tests? There's also "net: phylink: expand on .pcs_config() method documentation" which isn't being subjected to nipabot tests. Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!