From: Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@samsung.com>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, guo88.liu@samsung.com, yiwang.cai@samsung.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
joonki.min@samsung.com, hajun.sung@samsung.com,
d7271.choe@samsung.com, sw.ju@samsung.com,
"Dujeong.lee" <dujeong.lee@samsung.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>, Kevin Yang <yyd@google.com>,
Xueming Feng <kuro@kuroa.me>,
Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@samsung.com>,
cmllamas@google.com, willdeacon@google.com, maennich@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: check socket state before calling WARN_ON
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:49:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9OZS/hc+v5og6/U@perf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8KcXQhdRId1S6w8@perf>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5823 bytes --]
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 02:37:23PM +0900, Youngmin Nam wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:24:47PM -0500, Neal Cardwell wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 4:13 PM Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 12:17 AM Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@samsung.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Neal,
> > > > > Thank you for looking into this issue.
> > > > > When we first encountered this issue, we also suspected that tcp_write_queue_purge() was being called.
> > > > > We can provide any information you would like to inspect.
> > >
> > > Thanks again for raising this issue, and providing all that data!
> > >
> > > I've come up with a reproducer for this issue, and an explanation for
> > > why this has only been seen on Android so far, and a theory about a
> > > related socket leak issue, and a proposed fix for the WARN and the
> > > socket leak.
> > >
> > > Here is the scenario:
> > >
> > > + user process A has a socket in TCP_ESTABLISHED
> > >
> > > + user process A calls close(fd)
> > >
> > > + socket calls __tcp_close() and tcp_close_state() decides to enter
> > > TCP_FIN_WAIT1 and send a FIN
> > >
> > > + FIN is lost and retransmitted, making the state:
> > > ---
> > > tp->packets_out = 1
> > > tp->sacked_out = 0
> > > tp->lost_out = 1
> > > tp->retrans_out = 1
> > > ---
> > >
> > > + someone invokes "ss" to --kill the socket using the functionality in
> > > (1e64e298b8 "net: diag: Support destroying TCP sockets")
> > >
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c1e64e298b8cad309091b95d8436a0255c84f54a
> > >
> > > (note: this was added for Android, so would not be surprising to have
> > > this inet_diag --kill run on Android)
> > >
> > > + the ss --kill causes a call to tcp_abort()
> > >
> > > + tcp_abort() calls tcp_write_queue_purge()
> > >
> > > + tcp_write_queue_purge() sets packets_out=0 but leaves lost_out=1,
> > > retrans_out=1
> > >
> > > + tcp_sock still exists in TCP_FIN_WAIT1 but now with an inconsistent state
> > >
> > > + ACK arrives and causes a WARN_ON from tcp_verify_left_out():
> > >
> > > #define tcp_verify_left_out(tp) WARN_ON(tcp_left_out(tp) > tp->packets_out)
> > >
> > > because the state has:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > tcp_left_out(tp) = sacked_out + lost_out = 1
> > > tp->packets_out = 0
> > > ---
> > >
> > > because the state is:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > tp->packets_out = 0
> > > tp->sacked_out = 0
> > > tp->lost_out = 1
> > > tp->retrans_out = 1
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I guess perhaps one fix would be to just have tcp_write_queue_purge()
> > > zero out those other fields:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > tp->sacked_out = 0
> > > tp->lost_out = 0
> > > tp->retrans_out = 0
> > > ---
> > >
> > > However, there is a related and worse problem. Because this killed
> > > socket has tp->packets_out, the next time the RTO timer fires,
> > > tcp_retransmit_timer() notices !tp->packets_out is true, so it short
> > > circuits and returns without setting another RTO timer or checking to
> > > see if the socket should be deleted. So the tcp_sock is now sitting in
> > > memory with no timer set to delete it. So we could leak a socket this
> > > way. So AFAICT to fix this socket leak problem, perhaps we want a
> > > patch like the following (not tested yet), so that we delete all
> > > killed sockets immediately, whether they are SOCK_DEAD (orphans for
> > > which the user already called close() or not) :
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > > index 28cf19317b6c2..a266078b8ec8c 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > > @@ -5563,15 +5563,12 @@ int tcp_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
> > > local_bh_disable();
> > > bh_lock_sock(sk);
> > >
> > > - if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
> > > - if (tcp_need_reset(sk->sk_state))
> > > - tcp_send_active_reset(sk, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > - tcp_done_with_error(sk, err);
> > > - }
> > > + if (tcp_need_reset(sk->sk_state))
> > > + tcp_send_active_reset(sk, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > + tcp_done_with_error(sk, err);
> > >
> > > bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> > > local_bh_enable();
> > > - tcp_write_queue_purge(sk);
> > > release_sock(sk);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > ---
> >
> > Actually, it seems like a similar fix was already merged into Linux v6.11:
> >
> > bac76cf89816b tcp: fix forever orphan socket caused by tcp_abort
> >
> > Details below.
> >
> > Youngmin, does your kernel have this bac76cf89816b fix? If not, can
> > you please cherry-pick this fix and retest?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > neal
>
> Hi Neal.
>
> Thank you for your effort in debugging this issue with me.
> I also appreciate your detailed explanation and for finding the patch related to the issue.
>
> Our kernel(an Android kernel based on 6.6 LTS) does not have the patch you mentioned.(bac76cf89816b)
>
> I'll let you know the test results after applying the patch.
>
> Thank you.
>
Hi Neal.
There were confilcts when I cherry-picked the patch
"bac76cf89816b tcp: fix forever orphan socket caused by tcp_abort"
and it also has a dependency.
I believe we need a total of two patches,
which exist in the latest upstream for 6.6 LTS and earlier LTS trees.
5ce4645c23cf tcp: fix races in tcp_abort()
bac76cf89816 tcp: fix forever orphan socket caused by tcp_abort
So, I uploaded CLs for this to android kernel gerrit.
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/3530435 BACKPORT: tcp: fix races in tcp_abort()
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/3530436 BACKPORT: tcp: fix forever orphan socket caused by tcp_abort
After applying these patches, we conducted a total of three rounds of testing with 200 devices,
and all tests passed.
Thanks.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-14 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20241203081005epcas2p247b3d05bc767b1a50ba85c4433657295@epcas2p2.samsung.com>
2024-12-03 8:12 ` [PATCH] tcp: check socket state before calling WARN_ON Youngmin Nam
2024-12-03 11:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-03 15:34 ` Neal Cardwell
2024-12-04 2:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-04 3:39 ` Youngmin Nam
2024-12-04 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-04 7:48 ` Dujeong.lee
2024-12-04 14:21 ` Neal Cardwell
2024-12-05 12:31 ` Dujeong.lee
2025-01-17 5:08 ` Youngmin Nam
2025-01-17 15:18 ` Neal Cardwell
[not found] ` <CGME20250120001504epcas2p1d766c193256b4b7f79d19f61d76d697d@epcas2p1.samsung.com>
2025-01-20 0:18 ` Youngmin Nam
2025-02-03 5:21 ` Youngmin Nam
2025-02-24 21:13 ` Neal Cardwell
2025-02-25 17:24 ` Neal Cardwell
2025-02-25 18:28 ` Yuchung Cheng
2025-02-25 18:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-03-01 5:37 ` Youngmin Nam
2025-03-14 2:49 ` Youngmin Nam [this message]
2024-12-06 5:53 ` Youngmin Nam
2024-12-06 8:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-06 9:01 ` Youngmin Nam
2024-12-06 9:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-06 15:34 ` Neal Cardwell
[not found] ` <CGME20241209014847epcas2p219955d6e71c91d1f9b2b5dbca5d705d6@epcas2p2.samsung.com>
2024-12-09 1:52 ` Youngmin Nam
[not found] ` <CGME20241209012851epcas2p19a32fe38ec43dd2a91eda9540c11bf97@epcas2p1.samsung.com>
2024-12-09 1:32 ` Youngmin Nam
2024-12-09 10:16 ` Dujeong.lee
2024-12-09 10:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-10 3:38 ` Dujeong.lee
2024-12-10 7:10 ` Dujeong.lee
2024-12-18 10:18 ` Dujeong.lee
2024-12-18 10:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-30 0:23 ` Dujeong.lee
2024-12-30 9:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-02 0:22 ` Dujeong.lee
2025-01-02 8:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-03 4:16 ` Dujeong.lee
2024-12-04 3:26 ` Youngmin Nam
2024-12-04 8:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-04 3:08 ` Youngmin Nam
2024-12-04 9:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-05 2:45 ` Youngmin Nam
2024-12-13 7:14 ` Youngmin Nam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9OZS/hc+v5og6/U@perf \
--to=youngmin.nam@samsung.com \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=d7271.choe@samsung.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=dujeong.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guo88.liu@samsung.com \
--cc=hajun.sung@samsung.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=joonki.min@samsung.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuro@kuroa.me \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maennich@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sw.ju@samsung.com \
--cc=willdeacon@google.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
--cc=yiwang.cai@samsung.com \
--cc=yyd@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).