From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: stmmac: start PHY early in __stmmac_open
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 17:38:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBSlsyv+qcd30hBg@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f348ece4-90ef-4368-893a-73de37410fd2@lunn.ch>
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 06:34:13PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > NAK. A patch similar to this has already been sent.
> >
> > The problem with just moving this is that phylink can call the
> > mac_link_up() method *before* phylink_start() has returned - and as
> > this driver has not completed the setup, it doesn't expect the link
> > to come up at that point.
> >
> > There are several issues with this driver wanting the PHY clock early,
> > and there have been two people working on addressing this previously,
> > proposing two different changes to phylink.
> >
> > I sent them away to talk to each other and come back with a unified
> > solution. Shock horror, they never came back.
> >
> > Now we seem to be starting again from the beginning.
> >
> > stmmac folk really need to get a handle on this so reviewers are not
> > having to NAK similar patches time and time again, resulting in the
> > problem not being solved.
>
> And just adding to that, Developers should also get into the habit of
> searching to see if somebody has already tried and failed to solve the
> problem.
>
> “Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat It.”
>
> Try avoiding wasting everybody's times by learning a bit of history.
+1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000!
(Yes, factorial too! :) )
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-17 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-16 20:54 [PATCH 1/1] net: stmmac: start PHY early in __stmmac_open Shenwei Wang
2023-03-16 21:56 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-03-17 17:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-03-17 17:38 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2023-03-17 17:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-03-20 14:07 ` [EXT] " Shenwei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZBSlsyv+qcd30hBg@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).