From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
andrew@lunn.ch,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
Shahab Vahedi <Shahab.Vahedi@synopsys.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Looi Hong Aun <hong.aun.looi@intel.com>,
Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>,
Lai Peter Jun Ann <peter.jun.ann.lai@intel.com>,
Zulkifli Muhammad Husaini <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>,
Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@intel.com>,
hock.leong.kweh@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device before scanning for phy
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:18:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZC1K5mLAkkO7bjA4@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230405093945.3549491-1-michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 05:39:45PM +0800, Michael Sit Wei Hong wrote:
> Some DT devices already have phy device configured in the DT/ACPI.
> Current implementation scans for a phy unconditionally even though
> there is a phy listed in the DT/ACPI and already attached.
>
> We should check the fwnode if there is any phy device listed in
> fwnode and decide whether to scan for a phy to attach to.y
>
> Reported-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Suggested-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> Fixes: fe2cfbc96803 ("net: stmmac: check if MAC needs to attach to a PHY")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index d41a5f92aee7..7ca9be7bec06 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -1134,22 +1134,26 @@ static void stmmac_check_pcs_mode(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> static int stmmac_init_phy(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct fwnode_handle *phy_fwnode;
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> - bool phy_needed;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!phylink_expects_phy(priv->phylink))
> + return 0;
> +
> fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(priv->plat->phylink_node);
> if (!fwnode)
> fwnode = dev_fwnode(priv->device);
>
> if (fwnode)
> - ret = phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(priv->phylink, fwnode, 0);
> + phy_fwnode = fwnode_get_phy_node(fwnode);
> + else
> + phy_fwnode = NULL;
>
> - phy_needed = phylink_expects_phy(priv->phylink);
> /* Some DT bindings do not set-up the PHY handle. Let's try to
> * manually parse it
> */
> - if (!fwnode || phy_needed || ret) {
> + if (!phy_fwnode || IS_ERR(phy_fwnode)) {
> int addr = priv->plat->phy_addr;
> struct phy_device *phydev;
>
> @@ -1165,6 +1169,9 @@ static int stmmac_init_phy(struct net_device *dev)
> }
>
> ret = phylink_connect_phy(priv->phylink, phydev);
> + } else {
> + fwnode_handle_put(phy_fwnode);
> + ret = phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(priv->phylink, fwnode, 0);
> }
>
> if (!priv->plat->pmt) {
LGTM, thanks for taking on board my suggestion.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 9:39 [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device before scanning for phy Michael Sit Wei Hong
2023-04-05 10:07 ` Shahab Vahedi
2023-04-05 10:10 ` Shahab Vahedi
2023-04-05 10:53 ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-04-05 13:03 ` Looi, Hong Aun
2023-04-05 10:18 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2023-04-05 10:39 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2023-04-05 19:02 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZC1K5mLAkkO7bjA4@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=Shahab.Vahedi@synopsys.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=hock.leong.kweh@intel.com \
--cc=hong.aun.looi@intel.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com \
--cc=muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=peter.jun.ann.lai@intel.com \
--cc=tee.min.tan@intel.com \
--cc=weifeng.voon@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).