netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: add software timestamping support
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:27:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCQSf6Sc8A8E9ERN@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230329031337.3444547-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:13:37AM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> At present, bonding attempts to obtain the timestamp (ts) information of
> the active slave. However, this feature is only available for mode 1, 5,
> and 6. For other modes, bonding doesn't even provide support for software
> timestamping. To address this issue, let's call ethtool_op_get_ts_info
> when there is no primary active slave. This will enable the use of software
> timestamping for the bonding interface.

Would it make sense to check if all devices in the bond support
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE before returning it for the bond?
Applications might expect that a SW TX timestamp will be always
provided if the capability is reported.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-29 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-29  3:13 [PATCH net-next] bonding: add software timestamping support Hangbin Liu
2023-03-29  3:36 ` Jay Vosburgh
2023-03-30  4:01   ` Hangbin Liu
2023-03-30  4:39     ` Jay Vosburgh
2023-03-29 10:27 ` Miroslav Lichvar [this message]
2023-03-30  3:33   ` Hangbin Liu
2023-03-30  4:07     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-30  4:12     ` Jay Vosburgh
2023-03-31  3:32       ` Hangbin Liu
2023-04-03 10:18         ` Miroslav Lichvar
2023-04-05  9:04           ` Hangbin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZCQSf6Sc8A8E9ERN@localhost \
    --to=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
    --cc=jtoppins@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).