From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE71C761AF for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 12:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229659AbjDAMyy (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Apr 2023 08:54:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45522 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229505AbjDAMyx (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Apr 2023 08:54:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62CA4BDF4 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 05:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id h8so100166923ede.8 for ; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 05:54:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1680353691; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0beBMw+hMVh3FjRpEnhN5R5HjAtPpSbXA385RJD9c2E=; b=38HRFcDQLRXpJLwecxdoaQD4CqI1wH4hGxPQgwNzouW+klDFkUebYqvZvbPxXIkHlc Pif75a5M+MAs2Nfq1ZTkVvwmUeMI+hFnoSsGLvlMc1R94QZ4orSm8ThLa0+RiQUR9pjJ N6FPXq33FV+CvfvP5yo0ZhdMQM7PVJoJNVM8y+6j5dZGG/X1bqBDm1pJe2jGnVGD8lEN BejGfHtZr6Td5eGXuy8pJzOL6orgceR1+Hd61C5iS62y1gVyn2TsupQBrEtFSNnev9xR haIxcIK5L9hgzCVHoVOgL31VWY7OYn1B0ez8XyaptvLyieaL2BN90G/451Zh2M33Qeaz bxqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680353691; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=0beBMw+hMVh3FjRpEnhN5R5HjAtPpSbXA385RJD9c2E=; b=EkHOjwEJ0wNjtc4BnC0qoLItMNzhQQG60rhKFgxZpVMI61yB/Qe2m//xoLiza1+oqk T9aimK/cDADs5cWwsi36FcArU+ijQWJONLRRmoSAu5Biho37skaGnbhbQ67LOh5wXIRN 4iDU94DxgWh1IHupVQ2Gn+Zxgd/Q64WyhP+OdCCKCHLYWB3AKKFvyXOD4wDEzFJff+Mu MV+C+xvlM2bi3vBdJNNs1XL4fPjcfKkm5LxA7yBam5SBHCfNe5MyP1TDUg8/4wCQ0IID I1HcwNIxr4tM6z2zlyDYqXdDanQ9KeiONFvZ/yG2q9r8m1p1eJMriHEFOgjryFgZdMOK kxxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dYxCLy+2nmY9xqxClsmKRCvQMavOysYRBTkgfVChKCsghtY5cB zpHDx4/YTMsIOklPcLWz4gYFik4HOlabyYh2geg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bUwpdbBUsGt2YMZSM6UBEM8ok+A5wkqGFJ/2vNp5xI3vaP9FatSkLPZQzN2n/9Z3HPHsSF7w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1c09:b0:930:f953:9608 with SMTP id nc9-20020a1709071c0900b00930f9539608mr42672606ejc.0.1680353690799; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 05:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([86.61.181.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z16-20020a5096d0000000b00501d51c23fbsm2091370eda.6.2023.04.01.05.54.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 01 Apr 2023 05:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 14:54:49 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: Vadim Fedorenko Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com, vadfed@meta.com, kuba@kernel.org, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, pabeni@redhat.com, poros@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch dpll-rfc 0/7] dpll: initial patchset extension by mlx5 implementation Message-ID: References: <20230312022807.278528-1-vadfed@meta.com> <20230326170052.2065791-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <64e444ee-70e4-e51a-250d-471cfffeab5a@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <64e444ee-70e4-e51a-250d-471cfffeab5a@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 06:36:13PM CEST, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev wrote: >On 26/03/2023 18:00, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> From: Jiri Pirko >> >> Hi. >> >> This is extending your patchset. Basically, I do this on top of the >> changes I pointed out during review. For example patch #6 is exposing >> pin handle which is going to change, etc (there, I put a note). >> >> First 5 patches are just needed dependencies and you can squash them >> into your patch/patches. Last two patches should go in separatelly. >> >> Please note that the patch #6 is replacing the need to pass the rclk >> device during pin registration by putting a link between netdev and dpll >> pin. >> >> Please merge this into your dpll patchset and include it in the next >> RFC. Thanks! >> > >Hi Jiri! > >Thanks for the patch set. It looks like it covers some changes that I have >also done to address the comments. I'll try to combine everything in a couple >of days and will re-spin series and we restart review process. I think that >there are open question still in the conversation which were not answered. I hope I didn't miss anything. I believe I replied to every comment. Please tell me if not. Thanks! > >Best, >Vadim