netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: phy: smsc: add edpd tunable support
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2023 14:08:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZClwVbl8HeCxcHXa@corigine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66446a75-8087-10f4-fc37-b97e13b88c27@gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 11:47:34AM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> This adds support for the EDPD PHY tunable.
> Per default EDPD is disabled in interrupt mode, the tunable can be used
> to override this, e.g. if the link partner doesn't use EDPD.
> The interval to check for energy can be chosen between 1000ms and
> 2000ms. Note that this value consists of the 1000ms phylib interval
> for state machine runs plus the time to wait for energy being detected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/smsc.c  | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/smscphy.h |  4 ++
>  2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> index 0cd433f01..cca5bf46f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
>  #define SPECIAL_CTRL_STS_AMDIX_STATE_	0x2000
>  
>  #define EDPD_MAX_WAIT_DFLT		640

nit: Maybe this could be EDPD_MAX_WAIT_DFLT_MS for consistency
     with PHY_STATE_MACH_MS.

> +/* interval between phylib state machine runs in ms */
> +#define PHY_STATE_MACH_MS		1000
>  
>  struct smsc_hw_stat {
>  	const char *string;
> @@ -295,6 +297,86 @@ static void smsc_get_stats(struct phy_device *phydev,
>  		data[i] = smsc_get_stat(phydev, i);
>  }
>  
> +static int smsc_phy_get_edpd(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 *edpd)
> +{
> +	struct smsc_phy_priv *priv = phydev->priv;
> +
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (!priv->edpd_enable)
> +		*edpd = ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD_DISABLE;
> +	else if (!priv->edpd_max_wait_ms)
> +		*edpd = ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD_NO_TX;
> +	else
> +		*edpd = PHY_STATE_MACH_MS + priv->edpd_max_wait_ms;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int smsc_phy_set_edpd(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 edpd)
> +{
> +	struct smsc_phy_priv *priv = phydev->priv;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);

I am a little confused by this as by my reasoning this code is called via
the first arm of the following in set_phy_tunable(), and phydev->lock is
already held.

        if (phy_drv_tunable) {
                mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
                ret = phydev->drv->set_tunable(phydev, &tuna, data);
                mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
        } else {
                ret = dev->ethtool_ops->set_phy_tunable(dev, &tuna, data);
        }

> +
> +	switch (edpd) {
> +	case ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD_DISABLE:
> +		priv->edpd_enable = false;
> +		break;
> +	case ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD_NO_TX:
> +		priv->edpd_enable = true;
> +		priv->edpd_max_wait_ms = 0;
> +		break;
> +	case ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD_DFLT_TX_MSECS:
> +		edpd = PHY_STATE_MACH_MS + EDPD_MAX_WAIT_DFLT;
> +		fallthrough;
> +	default:
> +		if (phydev->irq != PHY_POLL)
> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;

This returns without releasing phydev->lock.
Is that intended?

> +		if (edpd < PHY_STATE_MACH_MS || edpd > PHY_STATE_MACH_MS + 1000)
> +			return -EINVAL;

Ditto.

> +		priv->edpd_enable = true;
> +		priv->edpd_max_wait_ms = edpd - PHY_STATE_MACH_MS;
> +	}
> +
> +	priv->edpd_mode_set_by_user = true;
> +
> +	ret = smsc_phy_config_edpd(phydev);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int smsc_phy_get_tunable(struct phy_device *phydev,
> +			 struct ethtool_tunable *tuna, void *data)
> +{
> +	switch (tuna->id) {
> +	case ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD:
> +		return smsc_phy_get_edpd(phydev, data);
> +	default:
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smsc_phy_get_tunable);
> +
> +int smsc_phy_set_tunable(struct phy_device *phydev,
> +			 struct ethtool_tunable *tuna, const void *data)
> +{
> +	switch (tuna->id) {
> +	case ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD:
> +		return smsc_phy_set_edpd(phydev, *(u16 *)data);
> +	default:
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smsc_phy_set_tunable);
> +
>  int smsc_phy_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &phydev->mdio.dev;
> diff --git a/include/linux/smscphy.h b/include/linux/smscphy.h
> index 80f37c1db..e1c886277 100644
> --- a/include/linux/smscphy.h
> +++ b/include/linux/smscphy.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ int smsc_phy_config_intr(struct phy_device *phydev);
>  irqreturn_t smsc_phy_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev);
>  int smsc_phy_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev);
>  int lan87xx_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev);
> +int smsc_phy_get_tunable(struct phy_device *phydev,
> +			 struct ethtool_tunable *tuna, void *data);
> +int smsc_phy_set_tunable(struct phy_device *phydev,
> +			 struct ethtool_tunable *tuna, const void *data);
>  int smsc_phy_probe(struct phy_device *phydev);
>  
>  #endif /* __LINUX_SMSCPHY_H__ */
> -- 
> 2.40.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-02 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-02  9:43 [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: phy: smsc: add support for edpd tunable Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02  9:44 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: phy: smsc: rename flag energy_enable Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02  9:45 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: phy: smsc: add helper smsc_phy_config_edpd Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02  9:45 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] net: phy: smsc: clear edpd_enable if interrupt mode is used Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02  9:46 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: phy: smsc: add flag edpd_mode_set_by_user Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02  9:47 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: phy: smss: prepare for making edpd wait period configurable Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02  9:47 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: phy: smsc: add edpd tunable support Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 12:08   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-04-02 13:52     ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02  9:48 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] net: phy: smsc: enable " Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: phy: smsc: add support for edpd tunable Florian Fainelli
2023-04-02 14:58   ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 23:33     ` Chris Healy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZClwVbl8HeCxcHXa@corigine.com \
    --to=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).