From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: phy: smsc: add edpd tunable support
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2023 14:08:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZClwVbl8HeCxcHXa@corigine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66446a75-8087-10f4-fc37-b97e13b88c27@gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 11:47:34AM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> This adds support for the EDPD PHY tunable.
> Per default EDPD is disabled in interrupt mode, the tunable can be used
> to override this, e.g. if the link partner doesn't use EDPD.
> The interval to check for energy can be chosen between 1000ms and
> 2000ms. Note that this value consists of the 1000ms phylib interval
> for state machine runs plus the time to wait for energy being detected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/smsc.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/smscphy.h | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> index 0cd433f01..cca5bf46f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
> #define SPECIAL_CTRL_STS_AMDIX_STATE_ 0x2000
>
> #define EDPD_MAX_WAIT_DFLT 640
nit: Maybe this could be EDPD_MAX_WAIT_DFLT_MS for consistency
with PHY_STATE_MACH_MS.
> +/* interval between phylib state machine runs in ms */
> +#define PHY_STATE_MACH_MS 1000
>
> struct smsc_hw_stat {
> const char *string;
> @@ -295,6 +297,86 @@ static void smsc_get_stats(struct phy_device *phydev,
> data[i] = smsc_get_stat(phydev, i);
> }
>
> +static int smsc_phy_get_edpd(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 *edpd)
> +{
> + struct smsc_phy_priv *priv = phydev->priv;
> +
> + if (!priv)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (!priv->edpd_enable)
> + *edpd = ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD_DISABLE;
> + else if (!priv->edpd_max_wait_ms)
> + *edpd = ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD_NO_TX;
> + else
> + *edpd = PHY_STATE_MACH_MS + priv->edpd_max_wait_ms;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int smsc_phy_set_edpd(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 edpd)
> +{
> + struct smsc_phy_priv *priv = phydev->priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!priv)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
I am a little confused by this as by my reasoning this code is called via
the first arm of the following in set_phy_tunable(), and phydev->lock is
already held.
if (phy_drv_tunable) {
mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
ret = phydev->drv->set_tunable(phydev, &tuna, data);
mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
} else {
ret = dev->ethtool_ops->set_phy_tunable(dev, &tuna, data);
}
> +
> + switch (edpd) {
> + case ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD_DISABLE:
> + priv->edpd_enable = false;
> + break;
> + case ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD_NO_TX:
> + priv->edpd_enable = true;
> + priv->edpd_max_wait_ms = 0;
> + break;
> + case ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD_DFLT_TX_MSECS:
> + edpd = PHY_STATE_MACH_MS + EDPD_MAX_WAIT_DFLT;
> + fallthrough;
> + default:
> + if (phydev->irq != PHY_POLL)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
This returns without releasing phydev->lock.
Is that intended?
> + if (edpd < PHY_STATE_MACH_MS || edpd > PHY_STATE_MACH_MS + 1000)
> + return -EINVAL;
Ditto.
> + priv->edpd_enable = true;
> + priv->edpd_max_wait_ms = edpd - PHY_STATE_MACH_MS;
> + }
> +
> + priv->edpd_mode_set_by_user = true;
> +
> + ret = smsc_phy_config_edpd(phydev);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int smsc_phy_get_tunable(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + struct ethtool_tunable *tuna, void *data)
> +{
> + switch (tuna->id) {
> + case ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD:
> + return smsc_phy_get_edpd(phydev, data);
> + default:
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smsc_phy_get_tunable);
> +
> +int smsc_phy_set_tunable(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + struct ethtool_tunable *tuna, const void *data)
> +{
> + switch (tuna->id) {
> + case ETHTOOL_PHY_EDPD:
> + return smsc_phy_set_edpd(phydev, *(u16 *)data);
> + default:
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smsc_phy_set_tunable);
> +
> int smsc_phy_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &phydev->mdio.dev;
> diff --git a/include/linux/smscphy.h b/include/linux/smscphy.h
> index 80f37c1db..e1c886277 100644
> --- a/include/linux/smscphy.h
> +++ b/include/linux/smscphy.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ int smsc_phy_config_intr(struct phy_device *phydev);
> irqreturn_t smsc_phy_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev);
> int smsc_phy_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev);
> int lan87xx_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev);
> +int smsc_phy_get_tunable(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + struct ethtool_tunable *tuna, void *data);
> +int smsc_phy_set_tunable(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + struct ethtool_tunable *tuna, const void *data);
> int smsc_phy_probe(struct phy_device *phydev);
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_SMSCPHY_H__ */
> --
> 2.40.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-02 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-02 9:43 [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: phy: smsc: add support for edpd tunable Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 9:44 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: phy: smsc: rename flag energy_enable Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 9:45 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: phy: smsc: add helper smsc_phy_config_edpd Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 9:45 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] net: phy: smsc: clear edpd_enable if interrupt mode is used Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 9:46 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: phy: smsc: add flag edpd_mode_set_by_user Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 9:47 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: phy: smss: prepare for making edpd wait period configurable Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 9:47 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: phy: smsc: add edpd tunable support Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 12:08 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-04-02 13:52 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 9:48 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] net: phy: smsc: enable " Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: phy: smsc: add support for edpd tunable Florian Fainelli
2023-04-02 14:58 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-02 23:33 ` Chris Healy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZClwVbl8HeCxcHXa@corigine.com \
--to=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).