From: "Ramón Nordin Rodriguez" <ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drivers/net/phy: add driver for Microchip LAN867x 10BASE-T1S PHY
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:08:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEE5XwqYrZfyhNXT@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b93039ef-a593-4acd-b9c1-3f3e6b79497d@lunn.ch>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 02:43:45PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 06:16:05PM +0200, Ramón Nordin Rodriguez wrote:
> > Changes:
> > v2:
> > - Removed mentioning of not supporting auto-negotiation from commit
> > message
> > - Renamed file drivers/net/phy/lan867x.c ->
> > drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1s.c
> > - Renamed Kconfig option to reflect implementation filename (from
> > LAN867X_PHY to MICROCHIP_T1S_PHY)
> > - Moved entry in drivers/net/phy/KConfig to correct sort order
> > - Moved entry in drivers/net/phy/Makefile to correct sort order
> > - Moved variable declarations to conform to reverse christmas tree order
> > (in func lan867x_config_init)
> > - Moved register write to disable chip interrupts to func lan867x_config_init, when omitting the irq disable all togheter I got null pointer dereference, see the call trace below:
> >
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > phy_interrupt+0xa8/0xf0 [libphy]
> > irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x60
> > irq_thread+0xf7/0x1c0
> > ? __pfx_irq_thread_dtor+0x10/0x10
> > ? __pfx_irq_thread+0x10/0x10
> > kthread+0xe6/0x110
> > ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
> > </TASK>
> >
> > - Removed func lan867x_config_interrupt and removed the member
> > .config_intr from the phy_driver struct
> >
> > v3:
> > - Indentation level in drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> > - Moved const arrays into global scope and made them static in order to have
> > them placed in the .rodata section
> > - Renamed array variables, since they are no longer as closely scoped as
> > earlier
> > - Added comment about why phy_write_mmd is used over phy_modify_mmd
> > (this should have been addressed in the V2 change since it was brought
> > up in the V1 review)
> > - Return result of last call instead of saving it in a var and then
> > returning the var (in lan867x_config_init)
> >
> > Testing:
> > This has been tested with ethtool --set/get-plca-cfg and verified on an
> > oscilloscope where it was observed that:
> > - The PLCA beacon was enabled/disabled when setting the node-id to 0/not
> > 0
> > - The PLCA beacon is transmitted with the expected frequency when
> > changing max nodes
> > - Two devices using the evaluation board EVB-LAN8670-USB could ping each
> > other
> >
> >
> > This patch adds support for the Microchip LAN867x 10BASE-T1S family
> > (LAN8670/1/2). The driver supports P2MP with PLCA.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ramón Nordin Rodriguez <ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se>
>
> All the above ends up in the commit message, as you see in git log. So
> this last paragraph should really be first. As you have it, the
> history of the patch will also be included in the commit. Most Linux
> subsystems don't want that, although DaveM has argued it maybe should
> be in the commit message. But i personally think we have good archives
> of emails, and search engines for those archives, so i don't see the
> need.
>
The intention was not to include the history in the commit message, as
you allude to this was a misstake on my part.
> Anything you put after the --- will get discarded when the Maintainers
> perform the merge. So i suggest you move most of what you have in the
> commit message below the ---. You can also have two ---, which is how
> i tend to do it, so i can keep the history in my git repo, but it then
> gets removed when merged upstream.
I'll move the history to after the ---
>
> Additionally, you should add any Reviewed-by:, Acked-by: to your
> patches. Only discard them if you make major changed which invalidates
> any reviews.
>
> Andrew
I will post a V4 soon as the 24h window closes on V4, with
- history after the patch
- reviewers:
- Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
- Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Hoping this is the last of the newbie misstakes I've managed to pull
off.
Ramón
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-20 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-19 16:16 [PATCH v3] drivers/net/phy: add driver for Microchip LAN867x 10BASE-T1S PHY Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-04-20 12:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-04-20 13:08 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEE5XwqYrZfyhNXT@debian \
--to=ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).