From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Emeel Hakim <ehakim@nvidia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net/mlx5e: Compare all fields in IPv6 address
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:35:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEFNyb4zAA/2rh9s@corigine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZEEqbUinuteJ148u@corigine.com>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 02:05:01PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 02:52:43PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 01:09:23PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:02:49AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > > >
> > > > Fix size argument in memcmp to compare whole IPv6 address.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: b3beba1fb404 ("net/mlx5e: Allow policies with reqid 0, to support IKE policy holes")
> > > > Reviewed-by: Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@nvidia.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h
> > > > index f7f7c09d2b32..4e9887171508 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h
> > > > @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static inline bool addr6_all_zero(__be32 *addr6)
> > > > {
> > > > static const __be32 zaddr6[4] = {};
> > > >
> > > > - return !memcmp(addr6, zaddr6, sizeof(*zaddr6));
> > > > + return !memcmp(addr6, zaddr6, sizeof(zaddr6));
> > >
> > > 1. Perhaps array_size() is appropriate here?
> >
> > It is overkill here, sizeof(zaddr6) is constant and can't overflow.
>
> Maybe, but the original code had a bug because using sizeof()
> directly is error prone.
Sorry, just to clarify.
I now realise that ARRAY_SIZE() is what I meant to suggest earlier.
> > 238 /**
> > 239 * array_size() - Calculate size of 2-dimensional array.
> > 240 * @a: dimension one
> > 241 * @b: dimension two
> > 242 *
> > 243 * Calculates size of 2-dimensional array: @a * @b.
> > 244 *
> > 245 * Returns: number of bytes needed to represent the array or SIZE_MAX on
> > 246 * overflow.
> > 247 */
> > 248 #define array_size(a, b) size_mul(a, b)
> >
> > > 2. It's a shame that ipv6_addr_any() or some other common helper
> > > can't be used.
> >
> > I didn't use ipv6_addr_any() as it required from me to cast "__be32 *addr6"
> > to be "struct in6_addr *" just to replace one line memcmp to another one
> > line function.
> >
> > Do you want me to post this code instead?
>
> No :)
>
> I don't have a strong desire for churn.
> Just for correct code.
>
> As your patch is correct, it is fine by me in the current form.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-20 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-20 8:02 [PATCH net-next 0/5] Fixes to mlx5 IPsec implementation Leon Romanovsky
2023-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net/mlx5e: Fix FW error while setting IPsec policy block action Leon Romanovsky
2023-04-20 11:23 ` Simon Horman
2023-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net/mlx5e: Don't overwrite extack message returned from IPsec SA validator Leon Romanovsky
2023-04-20 11:24 ` Simon Horman
2023-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net/mlx5e: Compare all fields in IPv6 address Leon Romanovsky
2023-04-20 11:09 ` Simon Horman
2023-04-20 11:52 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-04-20 12:05 ` Simon Horman
2023-04-20 14:35 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-04-20 17:13 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-04-21 9:04 ` Simon Horman
2023-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net/mlx5e: Properly release work data structure Leon Romanovsky
2023-04-20 11:23 ` Simon Horman
2023-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net/mlx5e: Refactor duplicated code in mlx5e_ipsec_init_macs Leon Romanovsky
2023-04-20 11:22 ` Simon Horman
2023-04-21 11:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] Fixes to mlx5 IPsec implementation patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEFNyb4zAA/2rh9s@corigine.com \
--to=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ehakim@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=raeds@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).