Re: [PATCH v9 vfio 2/7] vfio/pds: Initial support for pds_vfio VFIO driver

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 06:06:37PM -0700, Brett Creeley wrote:

> +static const struct vfio_device_ops
> +pds_vfio_ops = {
> +	.name = "pds-vfio",
> +	.init = pds_vfio_init_device,
> +	.release = vfio_pci_core_release_dev,
> +	.open_device = pds_vfio_open_device,
> +	.close_device = vfio_pci_core_close_device,
> +	.ioctl = vfio_pci_core_ioctl,
> +	.device_feature = vfio_pci_core_ioctl_feature,
> +	.read = vfio_pci_core_read,
> +	.write = vfio_pci_core_write,
> +	.mmap = vfio_pci_core_mmap,
> +	.request = vfio_pci_core_request,
> +	.match = vfio_pci_core_match,
> +	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> +	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> +	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> +};
> +
> +const struct vfio_device_ops *
> +pds_vfio_ops_info(void)
> +{
> +	return &pds_vfio_ops;
> +}

No reason for a function like this

It is a bit strange to split up the driver files so the registration is in a
different file than the ops implementation.

Jason