netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>,
	Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, poros@redhat.com,
	mschmidt@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 6/8] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops
Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 14:42:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFZLNLE567nhS6xs@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11b00a89-0882-8583-d624-63d0d0b29c85@linux.dev>

Fri, May 05, 2023 at 03:43:08PM CEST, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev wrote:
>On 04/05/2023 10:27, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 02:20:07AM CEST, vadfed@meta.com wrote:
>> > From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>> > 
>> > Implement basic DPLL operations in ptp_ocp driver as the
>> > simplest example of using new subsystem.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/ptp/Kconfig   |   1 +
>> > drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c | 327 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> > 2 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
>> > index b00201d81313..e3575c2e34dc 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
>> > @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_OCP
>> > 	depends on COMMON_CLK
>> > 	select NET_DEVLINK
>> > 	select CRC16
>> > +	select DPLL
>> > 	help
>> > 	  This driver adds support for an OpenCompute time card.
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
>> > index 2b63f3487645..100e5da0aeb3 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
>> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>> > #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>> > #include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
>> > #include <linux/crc16.h>
>> > +#include <linux/dpll.h>
>> > 
>> > #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_FACEBOOK			0x1d9b
>> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_FACEBOOK_TIMECARD		0x0400
>> > @@ -261,12 +262,21 @@ enum ptp_ocp_sma_mode {
>> > 	SMA_MODE_OUT,
>> > };
>> > 
>> > +static struct dpll_pin_frequency ptp_ocp_sma_freq[] = {
>> 
>> const
>
>Forgot about this one, will change it.
>
>> 
>> > +	DPLL_PIN_FREQUENCY_1PPS,
>> > +	DPLL_PIN_FREQUENCY_10MHZ,
>> > +	DPLL_PIN_FREQUENCY_IRIG_B,
>> > +	DPLL_PIN_FREQUENCY_DCF77,
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector {
>> > 	enum	ptp_ocp_sma_mode mode;
>> > 	bool	fixed_fcn;
>> > 	bool	fixed_dir;
>> > 	bool	disabled;
>> > 	u8	default_fcn;
>> > +	struct dpll_pin		   *dpll_pin;
>> > +	struct dpll_pin_properties dpll_prop;
>> > };
>> > 
>> > struct ocp_attr_group {
>> > @@ -295,6 +305,7 @@ struct ptp_ocp_serial_port {
>> > 
>> > #define OCP_BOARD_ID_LEN		13
>> > #define OCP_SERIAL_LEN			6
>> > +#define OCP_SMA_NUM			4
>> > 
>> > struct ptp_ocp {
>> > 	struct pci_dev		*pdev;
>> > @@ -351,8 +362,9 @@ struct ptp_ocp {
>> > 	u32			ts_window_adjust;
>> > 	u64			fw_cap;
>> > 	struct ptp_ocp_signal	signal[4];
>> > -	struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector sma[4];
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector sma[OCP_SMA_NUM];
>> > 	const struct ocp_sma_op *sma_op;
>> > +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>> > };
>> > 
>> > #define OCP_REQ_TIMESTAMP	BIT(0)
>> > @@ -836,6 +848,7 @@ static DEFINE_IDR(ptp_ocp_idr);
>> > struct ocp_selector {
>> > 	const char *name;
>> > 	int value;
>> > +	u64 frequency;
>> > };
>> > 
>> > static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_clock[] = {
>> > @@ -856,31 +869,31 @@ static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_clock[] = {
>> > #define SMA_SELECT_MASK		GENMASK(14, 0)
>> > 
>> > static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_sma_in[] = {
>> > -	{ .name = "10Mhz",	.value = 0x0000 },
>> > -	{ .name = "PPS1",	.value = 0x0001 },
>> > -	{ .name = "PPS2",	.value = 0x0002 },
>> > -	{ .name = "TS1",	.value = 0x0004 },
>> > -	{ .name = "TS2",	.value = 0x0008 },
>> > -	{ .name = "IRIG",	.value = 0x0010 },
>> > -	{ .name = "DCF",	.value = 0x0020 },
>> > -	{ .name = "TS3",	.value = 0x0040 },
>> > -	{ .name = "TS4",	.value = 0x0080 },
>> > -	{ .name = "FREQ1",	.value = 0x0100 },
>> > -	{ .name = "FREQ2",	.value = 0x0200 },
>> > -	{ .name = "FREQ3",	.value = 0x0400 },
>> > -	{ .name = "FREQ4",	.value = 0x0800 },
>> > -	{ .name = "None",	.value = SMA_DISABLE },
>> > +	{ .name = "10Mhz",  .value = 0x0000,      .frequency = 10000000 },
>> > +	{ .name = "PPS1",   .value = 0x0001,      .frequency = 1 },
>> > +	{ .name = "PPS2",   .value = 0x0002,      .frequency = 1 },
>> > +	{ .name = "TS1",    .value = 0x0004,      .frequency = 0 },
>> > +	{ .name = "TS2",    .value = 0x0008,      .frequency = 0 },
>> > +	{ .name = "IRIG",   .value = 0x0010,      .frequency = 10000 },
>> > +	{ .name = "DCF",    .value = 0x0020,      .frequency = 77500 },
>> > +	{ .name = "TS3",    .value = 0x0040,      .frequency = 0 },
>> > +	{ .name = "TS4",    .value = 0x0080,      .frequency = 0 },
>> > +	{ .name = "FREQ1",  .value = 0x0100,      .frequency = 0 },
>> > +	{ .name = "FREQ2",  .value = 0x0200,      .frequency = 0 },
>> > +	{ .name = "FREQ3",  .value = 0x0400,      .frequency = 0 },
>> > +	{ .name = "FREQ4",  .value = 0x0800,      .frequency = 0 },
>> > +	{ .name = "None",   .value = SMA_DISABLE, .frequency = 0 },
>> > 	{ }
>> > };
>> > 
>> > static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_sma_out[] = {
>> > -	{ .name = "10Mhz",	.value = 0x0000 },
>> > -	{ .name = "PHC",	.value = 0x0001 },
>> > -	{ .name = "MAC",	.value = 0x0002 },
>> > -	{ .name = "GNSS1",	.value = 0x0004 },
>> > -	{ .name = "GNSS2",	.value = 0x0008 },
>> > -	{ .name = "IRIG",	.value = 0x0010 },
>> > -	{ .name = "DCF",	.value = 0x0020 },
>> > +	{ .name = "10Mhz",	.value = 0x0000,  .frequency = 10000000 },
>> > +	{ .name = "PHC",	.value = 0x0001,  .frequency = 1 },
>> > +	{ .name = "MAC",	.value = 0x0002,  .frequency = 1 },
>> > +	{ .name = "GNSS1",	.value = 0x0004,  .frequency = 1 },
>> > +	{ .name = "GNSS2",	.value = 0x0008,  .frequency = 1 },
>> > +	{ .name = "IRIG",	.value = 0x0010,  .frequency = 10000 },
>> > +	{ .name = "DCF",	.value = 0x0020,  .frequency = 77000 },
>> > 	{ .name = "GEN1",	.value = 0x0040 },
>> > 	{ .name = "GEN2",	.value = 0x0080 },
>> > 	{ .name = "GEN3",	.value = 0x0100 },
>> > @@ -891,15 +904,15 @@ static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_sma_out[] = {
>> > };
>> > 
>> > static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_art_sma_in[] = {
>> > -	{ .name = "PPS1",	.value = 0x0001 },
>> > -	{ .name = "10Mhz",	.value = 0x0008 },
>> > +	{ .name = "PPS1",	.value = 0x0001,  .frequency = 1 },
>> > +	{ .name = "10Mhz",	.value = 0x0008,  .frequency = 1000000 },
>> > 	{ }
>> > };
>> > 
>> > static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_art_sma_out[] = {
>> > -	{ .name = "PHC",	.value = 0x0002 },
>> > -	{ .name = "GNSS",	.value = 0x0004 },
>> > -	{ .name = "10Mhz",	.value = 0x0010 },
>> > +	{ .name = "PHC",	.value = 0x0002,  .frequency = 1 },
>> > +	{ .name = "GNSS",	.value = 0x0004,  .frequency = 1 },
>> > +	{ .name = "10Mhz",	.value = 0x0010,  .frequency = 10000000 },
>> > 	{ }
>> > };
>> > 
>> > @@ -2283,22 +2296,34 @@ ptp_ocp_sma_fb_set_inputs(struct ptp_ocp *bp, int sma_nr, u32 val)
>> > static void
>> > ptp_ocp_sma_fb_init(struct ptp_ocp *bp)
>> > {
>> > +	struct dpll_pin_properties prop = {
>> 
>> Why don't you have this as static const outside the function?
>> 
>
>Because I'm changing label string for every pin. I cannot change it in
>the const object.

No you don't. You just copy prop to bp->sma[i].dpll_prop. Prop does not
change.


>
>> 
>> > +		.label = NULL,
>> 
>> Pointless init.
>
>Agree
>
>> > +		.type = DPLL_PIN_TYPE_EXT,
>> > +		.capabilities = DPLL_PIN_CAPS_DIRECTION_CAN_CHANGE,
>> > +		.freq_supported_num = ARRAY_SIZE(ptp_ocp_sma_freq),
>> > +		.freq_supported = ptp_ocp_sma_freq,
>> > +
>> > +	};
>> > 	u32 reg;
>> > 	int i;
>> > 
>> > 	/* defaults */
>> > +	for (i = 0; i < OCP_SMA_NUM; i++) {
>> > +		bp->sma[i].default_fcn = i & 1;
>> > +		bp->sma[i].dpll_prop = prop;
>> > +		bp->sma[i].dpll_prop.label = bp->ptp_info.pin_config[i].name;
>> > +	}
>> > 	bp->sma[0].mode = SMA_MODE_IN;
>> > 	bp->sma[1].mode = SMA_MODE_IN;
>> > 	bp->sma[2].mode = SMA_MODE_OUT;
>> > 	bp->sma[3].mode = SMA_MODE_OUT;
>> > -	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
>> > -		bp->sma[i].default_fcn = i & 1;
>> > -
>> > 	/* If no SMA1 map, the pin functions and directions are fixed. */
>> > 	if (!bp->sma_map1) {
>> > -		for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>> > +		for (i = 0; i < OCP_SMA_NUM; i++) {
>> > 			bp->sma[i].fixed_fcn = true;
>> > 			bp->sma[i].fixed_dir = true;
>> > +			bp->sma[1].dpll_prop.capabilities &=
>> > +				~DPLL_PIN_CAPS_DIRECTION_CAN_CHANGE;
>> > 		}
>> > 		return;
>> > 	}
>> > @@ -2308,7 +2333,7 @@ ptp_ocp_sma_fb_init(struct ptp_ocp *bp)
>> > 	 */
>> > 	reg = ioread32(&bp->sma_map2->gpio2);
>> > 	if (reg == 0xffffffff) {
>> > -		for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
>> > +		for (i = 0; i < OCP_SMA_NUM; i++)
>> > 			bp->sma[i].fixed_dir = true;
>> > 	} else {
>> > 		reg = ioread32(&bp->sma_map1->gpio1);
>> > @@ -2330,7 +2355,7 @@ static const struct ocp_sma_op ocp_fb_sma_op = {
>> > };
>> > 
>> > static int
>> > -ptp_ocp_fb_set_pins(struct ptp_ocp *bp)
>> > +ptp_ocp_set_pins(struct ptp_ocp *bp)
>> > {
>> > 	struct ptp_pin_desc *config;
>> > 	int i;
>> > @@ -2397,16 +2422,16 @@ ptp_ocp_fb_board_init(struct ptp_ocp *bp, struct ocp_resource *r)
>> > 
>> > 	ptp_ocp_tod_init(bp);
>> > 	ptp_ocp_nmea_out_init(bp);
>> > -	ptp_ocp_sma_init(bp);
>> > 	ptp_ocp_signal_init(bp);
>> > 
>> > 	err = ptp_ocp_attr_group_add(bp, fb_timecard_groups);
>> > 	if (err)
>> > 		return err;
>> > 
>> > -	err = ptp_ocp_fb_set_pins(bp);
>> > +	err = ptp_ocp_set_pins(bp);
>> > 	if (err)
>> > 		return err;
>> > +	ptp_ocp_sma_init(bp);
>> > 
>> > 	return ptp_ocp_init_clock(bp);
>> > }
>> > @@ -2446,6 +2471,14 @@ ptp_ocp_register_resources(struct ptp_ocp *bp, kernel_ulong_t driver_data)
>> > static void
>> > ptp_ocp_art_sma_init(struct ptp_ocp *bp)
>> > {
>> > +	struct dpll_pin_properties prop = {
>> > +		.label = NULL,
>> > +		.type = DPLL_PIN_TYPE_EXT,
>> > +		.capabilities = 0,
>> 
>> Same comment as to the similar prop struct above. Plus another pointless
>> init here.
>> 
>
>Will remove pointless init.
>
>> 
>> > +		.freq_supported_num = ARRAY_SIZE(ptp_ocp_sma_freq),
>> > +		.freq_supported = ptp_ocp_sma_freq,
>> > +
>> > +	};
>> > 	u32 reg;
>> > 	int i;
>> > 
>> > @@ -2460,16 +2493,16 @@ ptp_ocp_art_sma_init(struct ptp_ocp *bp)
>> > 	bp->sma[2].default_fcn = 0x10;	/* OUT: 10Mhz */
>> > 	bp->sma[3].default_fcn = 0x02;	/* OUT: PHC */
>> > 
>> > -	/* If no SMA map, the pin functions and directions are fixed. */
>> > -	if (!bp->art_sma) {
>> > -		for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>> > +
>> > +	for (i = 0; i < OCP_SMA_NUM; i++) {
>> > +		/* If no SMA map, the pin functions and directions are fixed. */
>> > +		bp->sma[i].dpll_prop = prop;
>> > +		bp->sma[i].dpll_prop.label = bp->ptp_info.pin_config[i].name;
>> > +		if (!bp->art_sma) {
>> > 			bp->sma[i].fixed_fcn = true;
>> > 			bp->sma[i].fixed_dir = true;
>> > +			continue;
>> > 		}
>> > -		return;
>> > -	}
>> > -
>> > -	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>> > 		reg = ioread32(&bp->art_sma->map[i].gpio);
>> > 
>> > 		switch (reg & 0xff) {
>> > @@ -2480,9 +2513,13 @@ ptp_ocp_art_sma_init(struct ptp_ocp *bp)
>> > 		case 1:
>> > 		case 8:
>> > 			bp->sma[i].mode = SMA_MODE_IN;
>> > +			bp->sma[i].dpll_prop.capabilities =
>> > +				DPLL_PIN_CAPS_DIRECTION_CAN_CHANGE;
>> > 			break;
>> > 		default:
>> > 			bp->sma[i].mode = SMA_MODE_OUT;
>> > +			bp->sma[i].dpll_prop.capabilities =
>> > +				DPLL_PIN_CAPS_DIRECTION_CAN_CHANGE;
>> > 			break;
>> > 		}
>> > 	}
>> > @@ -2549,6 +2586,9 @@ ptp_ocp_art_board_init(struct ptp_ocp *bp, struct ocp_resource *r)
>> > 	/* Enable MAC serial port during initialisation */
>> > 	iowrite32(1, &bp->board_config->mro50_serial_activate);
>> > 
>> > +	err = ptp_ocp_set_pins(bp);
>> > +	if (err)
>> > +		return err;
>> > 	ptp_ocp_sma_init(bp);
>> > 
>> > 	err = ptp_ocp_attr_group_add(bp, art_timecard_groups);
>> > @@ -2690,16 +2730,9 @@ sma4_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> > }
>> > 
>> > static int
>> > -ptp_ocp_sma_store(struct ptp_ocp *bp, const char *buf, int sma_nr)
>> > +ptp_ocp_sma_store_val(struct ptp_ocp *bp, int val, enum ptp_ocp_sma_mode mode, int sma_nr)
>> > {
>> > 	struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector *sma = &bp->sma[sma_nr - 1];
>> > -	enum ptp_ocp_sma_mode mode;
>> > -	int val;
>> > -
>> > -	mode = sma->mode;
>> > -	val = sma_parse_inputs(bp->sma_op->tbl, buf, &mode);
>> > -	if (val < 0)
>> > -		return val;
>> > 
>> > 	if (sma->fixed_dir && (mode != sma->mode || val & SMA_DISABLE))
>> > 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> > @@ -2734,6 +2767,20 @@ ptp_ocp_sma_store(struct ptp_ocp *bp, const char *buf, int sma_nr)
>> > 	return val;
>> > }
>> > 
>> > +static int
>> > +ptp_ocp_sma_store(struct ptp_ocp *bp, const char *buf, int sma_nr)
>> > +{
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector *sma = &bp->sma[sma_nr - 1];
>> > +	enum ptp_ocp_sma_mode mode;
>> > +	int val;
>> > +
>> > +	mode = sma->mode;
>> > +	val = sma_parse_inputs(bp->sma_op->tbl, buf, &mode);
>> > +	if (val < 0)
>> > +		return val;
>> > +	return ptp_ocp_sma_store_val(bp, val, mode, sma_nr);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static ssize_t
>> > sma1_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> > 	   const char *buf, size_t count)
>> > @@ -4172,12 +4219,148 @@ ptp_ocp_detach(struct ptp_ocp *bp)
>> > 	device_unregister(&bp->dev);
>> > }
>> > 
>> > +static int ptp_ocp_dpll_lock_status_get(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> > +					void *priv,
>> > +					enum dpll_lock_status *status,
>> > +					struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > +{
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp *bp = priv;
>> > +	int sync;
>> > +
>> > +	sync = ioread32(&bp->reg->status) & OCP_STATUS_IN_SYNC;
>> > +	*status = sync ? DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_LOCKED : DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_UNLOCKED;
>> 
>> Does your device support event delivery in case of the status change?
>> ice and mlx5 drivers do poll for changes in this area anyway. It's a
>> part of this patchset. You should do the same if your device does
>> not support events.
>> 
>> Could you please implement notifications using
>> dpll_device_notify() for status change and dpll_pin_notify() for pin
>> state change?
>> 
>
>We are working on implementation of interrupt-based notifications, that's why
>I didn't implement polling code. Hopefully it will be ready before the
>non-RFC patchset submission.

Do polling implementation if not and replace by interrupt driver later.
Point is, there have to be notifications from day 1.


>
>> 
>> > +
>> > +	return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int ptp_ocp_dpll_source_idx_get(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> > +				       void *priv, u32 *idx,
>> > +				       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > +{
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp *bp = priv;
>> > +
>> > +	if (bp->pps_select) {
>> > +		*idx = ioread32(&bp->pps_select->gpio1);
>> > +		return 0;
>> > +	}
>> > +	return -EINVAL;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int ptp_ocp_dpll_mode_get(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *priv,
>> > +				 u32 *mode, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > +{
>> > +	*mode = DPLL_MODE_AUTOMATIC;
>> > +	return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static bool ptp_ocp_dpll_mode_supported(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> > +					void *priv, const enum dpll_mode mode,
>> > +					struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > +{
>> > +	return mode == DPLL_MODE_AUTOMATIC;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int ptp_ocp_dpll_direction_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> > +				      void *pin_priv,
>> > +				      const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> > +				      void *priv,
>> > +				      enum dpll_pin_direction *direction,
>> > +				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > +{
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector *sma = pin_priv;
>> > +
>> > +	*direction = sma->mode == SMA_MODE_IN ?
>> > +				  DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_SOURCE :
>> > +				  DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_OUTPUT;
>> > +	return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int ptp_ocp_dpll_direction_set(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> > +				      void *pin_priv,
>> > +				      const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> > +				      void *dpll_priv,
>> > +				      enum dpll_pin_direction direction,
>> > +				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > +{
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector *sma = pin_priv;
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp *bp = dpll_priv;
>> > +	enum ptp_ocp_sma_mode mode;
>> > +	int sma_nr = (sma - bp->sma);
>> > +
>> > +	if (sma->fixed_dir)
>> 
>> I believe that this is a pointless check as DPLL_PIN_CAPS_DIRECTION_CAN_CHANGE
>> is not set and therefore the check in dpll_pin_direction_set() will be
>> true and -EOPNOTSUPP will be returned from there.
>> Remove this.
>
>Yep, will do it.
>
>> 
>> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> > +	mode = direction == DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_SOURCE ?
>> > +			    SMA_MODE_IN : SMA_MODE_OUT;
>> > +	return ptp_ocp_sma_store_val(bp, 0, mode, sma_nr);
>> 
>> You need sma_nr just here. Why can't you change ptp_ocp_sma_store_val()
>> to accept struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector * instead avoiding the need for
>> tne sma_nr completely?
>> 
>
>I wanted to add minimal changes to the driver, I will consider changing this
>as a separate net-next patch.

Hmm, you do change ptp_ocp_sma_store_val() here anyway. Could be an
extra patch in this patchset before this one if you want to have it
separate.


>
>> 
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int ptp_ocp_dpll_frequency_set(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> > +				      void *pin_priv,
>> > +				      const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> > +				      void *dpll_priv, u64 frequency,
>> > +				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > +{
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector *sma = pin_priv;
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp *bp = dpll_priv;
>> > +	const struct ocp_selector *tbl;
>> > +	int sma_nr = (sma - bp->sma);
>> > +	int val, i;
>> > +
>> > +	if (sma->fixed_fcn)
>> 
>> In that case, just fill up a single frequency in the properties,
>> avoid this check-fail and let the dpll core handle it.
>> 
>
>Makes sense.
>
>> 
>> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> > +
>> > +	tbl = bp->sma_op->tbl[sma->mode];
>> > +	for (i = 0; tbl[i].name; i++)
>> > +		if (tbl[i].frequency == frequency)
>> > +			return ptp_ocp_sma_store_val(bp, val, sma->mode, sma_nr);
>> > +	return -EINVAL;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int ptp_ocp_dpll_frequency_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> > +				      void *pin_priv,
>> > +				      const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> > +				      void *dpll_priv, u64 *frequency,
>> > +				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > +{
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector *sma = pin_priv;
>> > +	struct ptp_ocp *bp = dpll_priv;
>> > +	const struct ocp_selector *tbl;
>> > +	int sma_nr = (sma - bp->sma);
>> 
>> 1) void "()"s here.
>> 2) why don't you fill the sma_nr in struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector to make
>>     this easier to follow? IDK, just a suggestion, take or leave.
>> 
>> Same applies to the the rest of similar occurances above.
>> 
>
>Will do it, yes.
>
>> 
>> > +	u32 val;
>> > +	int i;
>> > +
>> > +	val = bp->sma_op->get(bp, sma_nr);
>> > +	tbl = bp->sma_op->tbl[sma->mode];
>> > +	for (i = 0; tbl[i].name; i++)
>> > +		if (val == tbl[i].value) {
>> > +			*frequency = tbl[i].frequency;
>> > +			return 0;
>> > +		}
>> > +
>> > +	return -EINVAL;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static const struct dpll_device_ops dpll_ops = {
>> > +	.lock_status_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_lock_status_get,
>> > +	.source_pin_idx_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_source_idx_get,
>> 
>> This op is a leftover, in dpll core it is not called. This was removed
>> and agreed that drivers should implement state_on_dpll_get() op for pins
>> to see which one is connected.
>> 
>> Please fix here and remove the leftover from DPLL patch #2 as well.

Did you miss this by any chance?


>> 
>> 
>> > +	.mode_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_mode_get,
>> > +	.mode_supported = ptp_ocp_dpll_mode_supported,
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +static const struct dpll_pin_ops dpll_pins_ops = {
>> > +	.frequency_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_frequency_get,
>> > +	.frequency_set = ptp_ocp_dpll_frequency_set,
>> > +	.direction_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_direction_get,
>> > +	.direction_set = ptp_ocp_dpll_direction_set,
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > static int
>> > ptp_ocp_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>> > {
>> > 	struct devlink *devlink;
>> > 	struct ptp_ocp *bp;
>> > -	int err;
>> > +	int err, i;
>> > +	u64 clkid;
>> > 
>> > 	devlink = devlink_alloc(&ptp_ocp_devlink_ops, sizeof(*bp), &pdev->dev);
>> > 	if (!devlink) {
>> > @@ -4227,8 +4410,39 @@ ptp_ocp_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>> > 
>> > 	ptp_ocp_info(bp);
>> > 	devlink_register(devlink);
>> > -	return 0;
>> > 
>> > +	clkid = pci_get_dsn(pdev);
>> > +	bp->dpll = dpll_device_get(clkid, 0, THIS_MODULE);
>> 
>> I suggested this the last time, but again: Could you please:
>> 1) rename dpll_device_get to __dpll_device_get
>> 2) introduce dpll_device_get as a macro filling up THIS_MODULE
>> 
>> Then drivers will just call always:
>> bp->dpll = dpll_device_get(clkid, 0);
>> and the macro will fillup the module automatically.
>> 
>> Please do the same for dpll_pin_get()
>> 
>
>Not sure why I have missed this part, but sure will do it.

Awesome.


>
>> 
>> > +	if (IS_ERR(bp->dpll)) {
>> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dpll_device_alloc failed\n");
>> 
>> You need to fix your error path to call devlink_unregister() in this
>> case.
>> 
>> 
>> > +		goto out;
>> > +	}
>> > +
>> > +	err = dpll_device_register(bp->dpll, DPLL_TYPE_PPS, &dpll_ops, bp, &pdev->dev);
>> > +	if (err)
>> 
>> You need to fix your error path to call dpll_device_put() in this
>> case.
>> 
>
>Ok, I'll re-check and update the error path for the next version.
>
>> 
>> > +		goto out;
>> > +
>> > +	for (i = 0; i < OCP_SMA_NUM; i++) {
>> > +		bp->sma[i].dpll_pin = dpll_pin_get(clkid, i, THIS_MODULE, &bp->sma[i].dpll_prop);
>> > +		if (IS_ERR(bp->sma[i].dpll_pin))
>> > +			goto out_dpll;
>> > +
>> > +		err = dpll_pin_register(bp->dpll, bp->sma[i].dpll_pin, &dpll_pins_ops,
>> > +					&bp->sma[i], NULL);
>> > +		if (err) {
>> > +			dpll_pin_put(bp->sma[i].dpll_pin);
>> > +			goto out_dpll;
>> > +		}
>> > +	}
>> > +
>> > +	return 0;
>> > +out_dpll:
>> > +	while (i) {
>> > +		--i;
>> 
>> 	while (i--) {
>> 	?
>> 
>> > +		dpll_pin_unregister(bp->dpll, bp->sma[i].dpll_pin, &dpll_pins_ops, &bp->sma[i]);
>> > +		dpll_pin_put(bp->sma[i].dpll_pin);
>> > +	}
>> > +	dpll_device_put(bp->dpll);
>> > out:
>> > 	ptp_ocp_detach(bp);
>> > out_disable:
>> > @@ -4243,7 +4457,16 @@ ptp_ocp_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> > {
>> > 	struct ptp_ocp *bp = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> > 	struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(bp);
>> > +	int i;
>> > 
>> > +	for (i = 0; i < OCP_SMA_NUM; i++) {
>> > +		if (bp->sma[i].dpll_pin) {
>> 
>> Remove this pointless check. It is always true.
>
>Agree.
>
>> 
>> 
>> > +			dpll_pin_unregister(bp->dpll, bp->sma[i].dpll_pin, &dpll_pins_ops, bp);
>> > +			dpll_pin_put(bp->sma[i].dpll_pin);
>> > +		}
>> > +	}
>> > +	dpll_device_unregister(bp->dpll, &dpll_ops, bp);
>> > +	dpll_device_put(bp->dpll);
>> > 	devlink_unregister(devlink);
>> > 	ptp_ocp_detach(bp);
>> > 	pci_disable_device(pdev);
>> > -- 
>> > 2.34.1
>> > 
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-06 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-28  0:20 [RFC PATCH v7 0/8] Create common DPLL configuration API Vadim Fedorenko
2023-04-28  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 1/8] dpll: spec: Add Netlink spec in YAML Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-04 12:02   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-04 21:24     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-05 10:29       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-11  7:44         ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11  8:00           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-11 14:55             ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11  7:40       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11  7:59         ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-11 20:51           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-15  9:30             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-16 12:05               ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-16 14:33                 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-18 13:24                   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-18 14:02                     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-11 15:20         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 20:53           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11 23:29             ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-16 12:15               ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11  7:38     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11  8:14       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-11 20:53         ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11 15:26       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 20:54         ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-04-28  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 2/8] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-02 15:38   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-06 18:47     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-03  8:09   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-06 18:50     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-04 11:18   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-04 20:27     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-06 18:55       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-04 21:21   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-09 12:54     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-09 13:40   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-09 12:53     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-06-13 13:49       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-22 14:45   ` Paolo Abeni
2023-06-09 12:51     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-04-28  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 3/8] dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-04 19:04   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-05 13:16     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-05 15:29       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 10:23         ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-04-28  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 4/8] ice: add admin commands to access cgu configuration Vadim Fedorenko
2023-04-28  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 5/8] ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-03 12:18   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-15 22:07     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-16  6:26       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-18 16:06         ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-19  6:15           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-25  9:01             ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-19  6:47         ` Paolo Abeni
2023-05-25  9:05           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-15 17:12   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-16  9:22     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-16 11:46       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-18 16:07         ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-19  6:15           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-04-28  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 6/8] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-04  9:27   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-05 13:43     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-06 12:42       ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-04-28  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 7/8] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice Vadim Fedorenko
2023-04-28  2:36   ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-28 10:00     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-04 20:31   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-05 10:32     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-04-28  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 8/8] mlx5: Implement SyncE support using DPLL infrastructure Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-02  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v7 0/8] Create common DPLL configuration API Jiri Pirko
2023-05-02 13:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-25 12:52   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11  7:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-25 13:01   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-17 10:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-26 10:14   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-26 10:39     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-05 10:07       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZFZLNLE567nhS6xs@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.michalik@intel.com \
    --cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
    --cc=mschmidt@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=poros@redhat.com \
    --cc=vadfed@meta.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).