From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@intel.com>,
"Michalik, Michal" <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, poros <poros@redhat.com>,
mschmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 1/8] dpll: spec: Add Netlink spec in YAML
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 10:14:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFyj5c//3NV4en12@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB466446F5594B3D90C7927E719B749@MN2PR11MB4664.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Thu, May 11, 2023 at 09:38:04AM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com wrote:
>>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
>>Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 2:03 PM
>>
>>Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 02:20:02AM CEST, vadfed@meta.com wrote:
>>>From: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
>>>
>>>Add a protocol spec for DPLL.
>>>Add code generated from the spec.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
>>>Signed-off-by: Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@intel.com>
>>>Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
>>>Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>>>---
>>> Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml | 472 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.c | 126 +++++++
>>> drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.h | 42 +++
>>> include/uapi/linux/dpll.h | 202 +++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 842 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.h
>>> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>>>
>>>diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
>>>b/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
>>>new file mode 100644
>>>index 000000000000..67ca0f6cf2d5
>>>--- /dev/null
>>>+++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
>>>@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
>>>+# SPDX-License-Identifier: ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-
>>>Clause)
>>>+
>>>+name: dpll
>>>+
>>>+doc: DPLL subsystem.
>>>+
>>>+definitions:
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: enum
>>>+ name: mode
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ working-modes a dpll can support, differentiate if and how dpll
>>>selects
>>>+ one of its sources to syntonize with it, valid values for DPLL_A_MODE
>>>+ attribute
>>>+ entries:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: unspec
>>
>>In general, why exactly do we need unspec values in enums and CMDs?
>>What is the usecase. If there isn't please remove.
>>
>
>Sure, fixed.
>
>>
>>>+ doc: unspecified value
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: manual
>>>+ doc: source can be only selected by sending a request to dpll
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: automatic
>>>+ doc: highest prio, valid source, auto selected by dpll
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: holdover
>>>+ doc: dpll forced into holdover mode
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: freerun
>>>+ doc: dpll driven on system clk, no holdover available
>>
>>Remove "no holdover available". This is not a state, this is a mode
>>configuration. If holdover is or isn't available, is a runtime info.
>>
>
>Fiexd.
>
>>
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: nco
>>>+ doc: dpll driven by Numerically Controlled Oscillator
>>>+ render-max: true
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: enum
>>>+ name: lock-status
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ provides information of dpll device lock status, valid values for
>>>+ DPLL_A_LOCK_STATUS attribute
>>>+ entries:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: unspec
>>>+ doc: unspecified value
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: unlocked
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ dpll was not yet locked to any valid source (or is in one of
>>>+ modes: DPLL_MODE_FREERUN, DPLL_MODE_NCO)
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: calibrating
>>>+ doc: dpll is trying to lock to a valid signal
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: locked
>>>+ doc: dpll is locked
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: holdover
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ dpll is in holdover state - lost a valid lock or was forced by
>>>+ selecting DPLL_MODE_HOLDOVER mode
>>
>>Is it needed to mention the holdover mode. It's slightly confusing,
>>because user might understand that the lock-status is always "holdover"
>>in case of "holdover" mode. But it could be "unlocked", can't it?
>>Perhaps I don't understand the flows there correctly :/
>>
>
>Yes, it could be unlocked even when user requests the 'holdover' mode, i.e.
>when the dpll was not locked to a valid source before requesting the mode.
>Improved the docs:
> name: holdover
> doc: |
> dpll is in holdover state - lost a valid lock or was forced
> by selecting DPLL_MODE_HOLDOVER mode (latter possible only
> when dpll lock-state was already DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_LOCKED,
> if it was not, the dpll's lock-status will remain
> DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_UNLOCKED even if user requests
> DPLL_MODE_HOLDOVER)
>Is that better?
See my comment to this in the other branch of this thread.
>
>>
>>>+ render-max: true
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: const
>>>+ name: temp-divider
>>>+ value: 10
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ temperature divider allowing userspace to calculate the
>>>+ temperature as float with single digit precision.
>>>+ Value of (DPLL_A_TEMP / DPLL_TEMP_DIVIDER) is integer part of
>>>+ tempearture value.
>>
>>s/tempearture/temperature/
>>
>>Didn't checkpatch warn you?
>>
>
>Fixed, thanks!
>No, I don't think it did.
>
>>
>>>+ Value of (DPLL_A_TEMP % DPLL_TEMP_DIVIDER) is fractional part of
>>>+ temperature value.
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: enum
>>>+ name: type
>>>+ doc: type of dpll, valid values for DPLL_A_TYPE attribute
>>>+ entries:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: unspec
>>>+ doc: unspecified value
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pps
>>>+ doc: dpll produces Pulse-Per-Second signal
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: eec
>>>+ doc: dpll drives the Ethernet Equipment Clock
>>>+ render-max: true
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: enum
>>>+ name: pin-type
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ defines possible types of a pin, valid values for DPLL_A_PIN_TYPE
>>>+ attribute
>>>+ entries:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: unspec
>>>+ doc: unspecified value
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: mux
>>>+ doc: aggregates another layer of selectable pins
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: ext
>>>+ doc: external source
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: synce-eth-port
>>>+ doc: ethernet port PHY's recovered clock
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: int-oscillator
>>>+ doc: device internal oscillator
>>
>>Is this somehow related to the mode "nco" (Numerically Controlled
>>Oscillator)?
>>
>
>Yes.
How? Why do we need to expose it as a pin then?
>
>>
>>
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: gnss
>>>+ doc: GNSS recovered clock
>>>+ render-max: true
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: enum
>>>+ name: pin-direction
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ defines possible direction of a pin, valid values for
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_DIRECTION attribute
>>>+ entries:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: unspec
>>>+ doc: unspecified value
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: source
>>>+ doc: pin used as a source of a signal
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: output
>>>+ doc: pin used to output the signal
>>>+ render-max: true
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: const
>>>+ name: pin-frequency-1-hz
>>>+ value: 1
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: const
>>>+ name: pin-frequency-10-mhz
>>>+ value: 10000000
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: enum
>>>+ name: pin-state
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ defines possible states of a pin, valid values for
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_STATE attribute
>>>+ entries:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: unspec
>>>+ doc: unspecified value
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: connected
>>>+ doc: pin connected, active source of phase locked loop
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: disconnected
>>>+ doc: pin disconnected, not considered as a valid source
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: selectable
>>>+ doc: pin enabled for automatic source selection
>>>+ render-max: true
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: flags
>>>+ name: pin-caps
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ defines possible capabilities of a pin, valid flags on
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_CAPS attribute
>>>+ entries:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: direction-can-change
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: priority-can-change
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: state-can-change
>>>+ -
>>>+ type: enum
>>>+ name: event
>>>+ doc: events of dpll generic netlink family
>>>+ entries:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: unspec
>>>+ doc: invalid event type
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: device-create
>>>+ doc: dpll device created
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: device-delete
>>>+ doc: dpll device deleted
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: device-change
>>
>>Please have a separate create/delete/change values for pins.
>>
>
>Makes sense, but details, pin creation doesn't occur from uAPI perspective,
>as the pins itself are not visible to the user. They are visible after they
>are registered with a device, thus we would have to do something like:
>- pin-register
>- pin-unregister
>- pin-change
>
>Does it make sense?
From perspective of user, it is "creation/new" or "deletion/del".
Object appears of dissapears in UAPI, no matter how this is implemented
in kernel. If you call it register/unregister, that exposes unnecessary
internal kernel notation.
No strong feeling though if you insist on register/unregister, it just
sounds odd and funny.
Anyway, one way or another, be in-sync naming wise with device events.
>
>>
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ attribute of dpll device or pin changed, reason is to be found
>>>with
>>>+ an attribute type (DPLL_A_*) received with the event
>>>+
>>>+
>>>+attribute-sets:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: dpll
>>>+ enum-name: dplla
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: device
>>>+ type: nest
>>>+ value: 1
>>
>>Why not 0?
>>
>
>Sorry I don't recall what exact technical reasons are behind it, but all
>netlink attributes I have found have 0 value attribute unused/unspec.
I don't see why that is needed, I may be missing something though.
Up to you.
>
>>Also, Plese don't have this attr as a first one. It is related to
>>PIN_GET/SET cmd, it should be somewhere among related attributes.
>>
>>Definitelly, the handle ATTR/ATTTs should be the first one/ones.
>>
>
>Sure, fixed.
>
>>
>>
>>>+ multi-attr: true
>>>+ nested-attributes: device
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: id
>>>+ type: u32
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: dev-name
>>>+ type: string
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: bus-name
>>>+ type: string
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: mode
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: mode
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: mode-supported
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: mode
>>>+ multi-attr: true
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: lock-status
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: lock-status
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: temp
>>>+ type: s32
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: clock-id
>>>+ type: u64
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: type
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: type
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-idx
>>>+ type: u32
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-label
>>>+ type: string
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-type
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: pin-type
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-direction
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: pin-direction
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-frequency
>>>+ type: u64
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-frequency-supported
>>>+ type: nest
>>>+ multi-attr: true
>>>+ nested-attributes: pin-frequency-range
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-frequency-min
>>>+ type: u64
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-frequency-max
>>>+ type: u64
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-prio
>>>+ type: u32
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-state
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: pin-state
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-parent
>>>+ type: nest
>>>+ multi-attr: true
>>>+ nested-attributes: pin-parent
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-parent-idx
>>>+ type: u32
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-rclk-device
>>>+ type: string
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-dpll-caps
>>>+ type: u32
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: device
>>>+ subset-of: dpll
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: id
>>>+ type: u32
>>>+ value: 2
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: dev-name
>>>+ type: string
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: bus-name
>>>+ type: string
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: mode
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: mode
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: mode-supported
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: mode
>>>+ multi-attr: true
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: lock-status
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: lock-status
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: temp
>>>+ type: s32
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: clock-id
>>>+ type: u64
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: type
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: type
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-prio
>>>+ type: u32
>>>+ value: 19
>>
>>Do you still need to pass values for a subset? That is odd. Well, I
>>think is is odd to pass anything other than names in subset definition,
>>the rest of the info is in the original attribute set definition,
>>isn't it?
>>Jakub?
>>
>
>Yes it is fixed, I will remove those.
>
>>
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-state
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ enum: pin-state
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-parent
>>>+ subset-of: dpll
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-state
>>>+ type: u8
>>>+ value: 20
>>>+ enum: pin-state
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-parent-idx
>>>+ type: u32
>>>+ value: 22
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-rclk-device
>>>+ type: string
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-frequency-range
>>>+ subset-of: dpll
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-frequency-min
>>>+ type: u64
>>>+ value: 17
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-frequency-max
>>>+ type: u64
>>>+
>>>+operations:
>>>+ list:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: unspec
>>>+ doc: unused
>>>+
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: device-get
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ Get list of DPLL devices (dump) or attributes of a single dpll
>>>device
>>>+ attribute-set: dpll
>>>+ flags: [ admin-perm ]
>>
>>I may be missing something, but why do you enforce adming perm for
>>get/dump cmds?
>>
>
>Yes, security reasons, we don't want regular users to spam-query the driver
>ops. Also explained in docs:
>All netlink commands require ``GENL_ADMIN_PERM``. This is to prevent
>any spamming/D.o.S. from unauthorized userspace applications.
Hmm, I wonder why other read cmds usually don't need this. In fact,
is there some read netlink cmd in kernel now which needs it?
>
>>
>>>+
>>>+ do:
>>>+ pre: dpll-pre-doit
>>>+ post: dpll-post-doit
>>>+ request:
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ - id
>>>+ - bus-name
>>>+ - dev-name
>>>+ reply:
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ - device
>>>+
>>>+ dump:
>>>+ pre: dpll-pre-dumpit
>>>+ post: dpll-post-dumpit
>>>+ reply:
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ - device
>>
>>I might be missing something, but this means "device" netdev attribute
>>DPLL_A_DEVICE, right? If yes, that is incorrect and you should list all
>>the device attrs.
>>
>
>Actually this means that attributes expected in response to this command are
>from `device` subset.
>But I see your point, will make `device` subset only for pin's nested
>attributes, and here will list device attributes.
Yes, that is my point. The fix you describes sounds fine.
>
>>
>>>+
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: device-set
>>>+ doc: Set attributes for a DPLL device
>>>+ attribute-set: dpll
>>>+ flags: [ admin-perm ]
>>>+
>>>+ do:
>>>+ pre: dpll-pre-doit
>>>+ post: dpll-post-doit
>>>+ request:
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ - id
>>>+ - bus-name
>>>+ - dev-name
>>>+ - mode
>>>+
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-get
>>>+ doc: |
>>>+ Get list of pins and its attributes.
>>>+ - dump request without any attributes given - list all the pins
>>>in the system
>>>+ - dump request with target dpll - list all the pins registered
>>>with a given dpll device
>>>+ - do request with target dpll and target pin - single pin attributes
>>>+ attribute-set: dpll
>>>+ flags: [ admin-perm ]
>>>+
>>>+ do:
>>>+ pre: dpll-pin-pre-doit
>>>+ post: dpll-pin-post-doit
>>>+ request:
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ - id
>>>+ - bus-name
>>>+ - dev-name
>>>+ - pin-idx
>>>+ reply: &pin-attrs
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ - pin-idx
>>>+ - pin-label
>>>+ - pin-type
>>>+ - pin-direction
>>>+ - pin-frequency
>>>+ - pin-frequency-supported
>>>+ - pin-parent
>>>+ - pin-rclk-device
>>>+ - pin-dpll-caps
>>>+ - device
>>>+
>>>+ dump:
>>>+ pre: dpll-pin-pre-dumpit
>>>+ post: dpll-pin-post-dumpit
>>>+ request:
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ - id
>>>+ - bus-name
>>>+ - dev-name
>>>+ reply: *pin-attrs
>>>+
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: pin-set
>>>+ doc: Set attributes of a target pin
>>>+ attribute-set: dpll
>>>+ flags: [ admin-perm ]
>>>+
>>>+ do:
>>>+ pre: dpll-pin-pre-doit
>>>+ post: dpll-pin-post-doit
>>>+ request:
>>>+ attributes:
>>>+ - id
>>>+ - bus-name
>>>+ - dev-name
>>>+ - pin-idx
>>>+ - pin-frequency
>>>+ - pin-direction
>>>+ - pin-prio
>>>+ - pin-state
>>>+ - pin-parent-idx
>>>+
>>>+mcast-groups:
>>>+ list:
>>>+ -
>>>+ name: monitor
>>>diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.c
>>>new file mode 100644
>>>index 000000000000..2f8643f401b0
>>>--- /dev/null
>>>+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.c
>>>@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
>>>+// SPDX-License-Identifier: ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-
>>>Clause)
>>>+/* Do not edit directly, auto-generated from: */
>>>+/* Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml */
>>>+/* YNL-GEN kernel source */
>>>+
>>>+#include <net/netlink.h>
>>>+#include <net/genetlink.h>
>>>+
>>>+#include "dpll_nl.h"
>>>+
>>>+#include <linux/dpll.h>
>>>+
>>>+/* DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET - do */
>>>+static const struct nla_policy dpll_device_get_nl_policy[DPLL_A_BUS_NAME
>>>+ 1] = {
>>>+ [DPLL_A_ID] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_BUS_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_DEV_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+/* DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_SET - do */
>>>+static const struct nla_policy dpll_device_set_nl_policy[DPLL_A_MODE + 1]
>>>= {
>>>+ [DPLL_A_ID] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_BUS_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_DEV_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_MODE] = NLA_POLICY_MAX(NLA_U8, 5),
>>
>>I know it is a matter of the generator script, still have to note it
>>hurts my eyes to see "5" here :)
>>
>
>Yes, that's true.
>
>Thanks!
>Arkadiusz
>
>>
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+/* DPLL_CMD_PIN_GET - do */
>>>+static const struct nla_policy dpll_pin_get_do_nl_policy[DPLL_A_PIN_IDX +
>>>1] = {
>>>+ [DPLL_A_ID] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_BUS_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_DEV_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_PIN_IDX] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+/* DPLL_CMD_PIN_GET - dump */
>>>+static const struct nla_policy
>>>dpll_pin_get_dump_nl_policy[DPLL_A_BUS_NAME + 1] = {
>>>+ [DPLL_A_ID] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_BUS_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_DEV_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+/* DPLL_CMD_PIN_SET - do */
>>>+static const struct nla_policy
>>>dpll_pin_set_nl_policy[DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT_IDX + 1] = {
>>>+ [DPLL_A_ID] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_BUS_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_DEV_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_PIN_IDX] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY] = { .type = NLA_U64, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_PIN_DIRECTION] = NLA_POLICY_MAX(NLA_U8, 2),
>>>+ [DPLL_A_PIN_PRIO] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
>>>+ [DPLL_A_PIN_STATE] = NLA_POLICY_MAX(NLA_U8, 3),
>>>+ [DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT_IDX] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+/* Ops table for dpll */
>>>+static const struct genl_split_ops dpll_nl_ops[] = {
>>>+ {
>>>+ .cmd = DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET,
>>>+ .pre_doit = dpll_pre_doit,
>>>+ .doit = dpll_nl_device_get_doit,
>>>+ .post_doit = dpll_post_doit,
>>>+ .policy = dpll_device_get_nl_policy,
>>>+ .maxattr = DPLL_A_BUS_NAME,
>>>+ .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM | GENL_CMD_CAP_DO,
>>>+ },
>>>+ {
>>>+ .cmd = DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET,
>>>+ .start = dpll_pre_dumpit,
>>>+ .dumpit = dpll_nl_device_get_dumpit,
>>>+ .done = dpll_post_dumpit,
>>>+ .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM | GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP,
>>>+ },
>>>+ {
>>>+ .cmd = DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_SET,
>>>+ .pre_doit = dpll_pre_doit,
>>>+ .doit = dpll_nl_device_set_doit,
>>>+ .post_doit = dpll_post_doit,
>>>+ .policy = dpll_device_set_nl_policy,
>>>+ .maxattr = DPLL_A_MODE,
>>>+ .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM | GENL_CMD_CAP_DO,
>>>+ },
>>>+ {
>>>+ .cmd = DPLL_CMD_PIN_GET,
>>>+ .pre_doit = dpll_pin_pre_doit,
>>>+ .doit = dpll_nl_pin_get_doit,
>>>+ .post_doit = dpll_pin_post_doit,
>>>+ .policy = dpll_pin_get_do_nl_policy,
>>>+ .maxattr = DPLL_A_PIN_IDX,
>>>+ .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM | GENL_CMD_CAP_DO,
>>>+ },
>>>+ {
>>>+ .cmd = DPLL_CMD_PIN_GET,
>>>+ .start = dpll_pin_pre_dumpit,
>>>+ .dumpit = dpll_nl_pin_get_dumpit,
>>>+ .done = dpll_pin_post_dumpit,
>>>+ .policy = dpll_pin_get_dump_nl_policy,
>>>+ .maxattr = DPLL_A_BUS_NAME,
>>>+ .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM | GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP,
>>>+ },
>>>+ {
>>>+ .cmd = DPLL_CMD_PIN_SET,
>>>+ .pre_doit = dpll_pin_pre_doit,
>>>+ .doit = dpll_nl_pin_set_doit,
>>>+ .post_doit = dpll_pin_post_doit,
>>>+ .policy = dpll_pin_set_nl_policy,
>>>+ .maxattr = DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT_IDX,
>>>+ .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM | GENL_CMD_CAP_DO,
>>>+ },
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+static const struct genl_multicast_group dpll_nl_mcgrps[] = {
>>>+ [DPLL_NLGRP_MONITOR] = { "monitor", },
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+struct genl_family dpll_nl_family __ro_after_init = {
>>>+ .name = DPLL_FAMILY_NAME,
>>>+ .version = DPLL_FAMILY_VERSION,
>>>+ .netnsok = true,
>>>+ .parallel_ops = true,
>>>+ .module = THIS_MODULE,
>>>+ .split_ops = dpll_nl_ops,
>>>+ .n_split_ops = ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_nl_ops),
>>>+ .mcgrps = dpll_nl_mcgrps,
>>>+ .n_mcgrps = ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_nl_mcgrps),
>>>+};
>>>diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.h b/drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.h
>>>new file mode 100644
>>>index 000000000000..57ab2da562ba
>>>--- /dev/null
>>>+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.h
>>>@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
>>>+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-
>>>Clause) */
>>>+/* Do not edit directly, auto-generated from: */
>>>+/* Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml */
>>>+/* YNL-GEN kernel header */
>>>+
>>>+#ifndef _LINUX_DPLL_GEN_H
>>>+#define _LINUX_DPLL_GEN_H
>>>+
>>>+#include <net/netlink.h>
>>>+#include <net/genetlink.h>
>>>+
>>>+#include <linux/dpll.h>
>>>+
>>>+int dpll_pre_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>+ struct genl_info *info);
>>>+int dpll_pin_pre_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>+ struct genl_info *info);
>>>+void
>>>+dpll_post_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>+ struct genl_info *info);
>>>+void
>>>+dpll_pin_post_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>+ struct genl_info *info);
>>>+int dpll_pre_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb);
>>>+int dpll_pin_pre_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb);
>>>+int dpll_post_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb);
>>>+int dpll_pin_post_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb);
>>>+
>>>+int dpll_nl_device_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info);
>>>+int dpll_nl_device_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
>>>netlink_callback *cb);
>>>+int dpll_nl_device_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info);
>>>+int dpll_nl_pin_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info);
>>>+int dpll_nl_pin_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback
>>>*cb);
>>>+int dpll_nl_pin_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info);
>>>+
>>>+enum {
>>>+ DPLL_NLGRP_MONITOR,
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+extern struct genl_family dpll_nl_family;
>>>+
>>>+#endif /* _LINUX_DPLL_GEN_H */
>>>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h b/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>>>new file mode 100644
>>>index 000000000000..e188bc189754
>>>--- /dev/null
>>>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>>>@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
>>>+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-
>>>Clause) */
>>>+/* Do not edit directly, auto-generated from: */
>>>+/* Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml */
>>>+/* YNL-GEN uapi header */
>>>+
>>>+#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_DPLL_H
>>>+#define _UAPI_LINUX_DPLL_H
>>>+
>>>+#define DPLL_FAMILY_NAME "dpll"
>>>+#define DPLL_FAMILY_VERSION 1
>>>+
>>>+/**
>>>+ * enum dpll_mode - working-modes a dpll can support, differentiate if and
>>>how
>>>+ * dpll selects one of its sources to syntonize with it, valid values for
>>>+ * DPLL_A_MODE attribute
>>>+ * @DPLL_MODE_UNSPEC: unspecified value
>>>+ * @DPLL_MODE_MANUAL: source can be only selected by sending a request to
>>>dpll
>>>+ * @DPLL_MODE_AUTOMATIC: highest prio, valid source, auto selected by dpll
>>>+ * @DPLL_MODE_HOLDOVER: dpll forced into holdover mode
>>>+ * @DPLL_MODE_FREERUN: dpll driven on system clk, no holdover available
>>>+ * @DPLL_MODE_NCO: dpll driven by Numerically Controlled Oscillator
>>>+ */
>>>+enum dpll_mode {
>>>+ DPLL_MODE_UNSPEC,
>>>+ DPLL_MODE_MANUAL,
>>>+ DPLL_MODE_AUTOMATIC,
>>>+ DPLL_MODE_HOLDOVER,
>>>+ DPLL_MODE_FREERUN,
>>>+ DPLL_MODE_NCO,
>>>+
>>>+ __DPLL_MODE_MAX,
>>>+ DPLL_MODE_MAX = (__DPLL_MODE_MAX - 1)
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+/**
>>>+ * enum dpll_lock_status - provides information of dpll device lock
>>>status,
>>>+ * valid values for DPLL_A_LOCK_STATUS attribute
>>>+ * @DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_UNSPEC: unspecified value
>>>+ * @DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_UNLOCKED: dpll was not yet locked to any valid
>>>source (or
>>>+ * is in one of modes: DPLL_MODE_FREERUN, DPLL_MODE_NCO)
>>>+ * @DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_CALIBRATING: dpll is trying to lock to a valid
>>>signal
>>>+ * @DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_LOCKED: dpll is locked
>>>+ * @DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_HOLDOVER: dpll is in holdover state - lost a valid
>>>lock or
>>>+ * was forced by selecting DPLL_MODE_HOLDOVER mode
>>>+ */
>>>+enum dpll_lock_status {
>>>+ DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_UNSPEC,
>>>+ DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_UNLOCKED,
>>>+ DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_CALIBRATING,
>>>+ DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_LOCKED,
>>>+ DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_HOLDOVER,
>>>+
>>>+ __DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_MAX,
>>>+ DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_MAX = (__DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_MAX - 1)
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+#define DPLL_TEMP_DIVIDER 10
>>>+
>>>+/**
>>>+ * enum dpll_type - type of dpll, valid values for DPLL_A_TYPE attribute
>>>+ * @DPLL_TYPE_UNSPEC: unspecified value
>>>+ * @DPLL_TYPE_PPS: dpll produces Pulse-Per-Second signal
>>>+ * @DPLL_TYPE_EEC: dpll drives the Ethernet Equipment Clock
>>>+ */
>>>+enum dpll_type {
>>>+ DPLL_TYPE_UNSPEC,
>>>+ DPLL_TYPE_PPS,
>>>+ DPLL_TYPE_EEC,
>>>+
>>>+ __DPLL_TYPE_MAX,
>>>+ DPLL_TYPE_MAX = (__DPLL_TYPE_MAX - 1)
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+/**
>>>+ * enum dpll_pin_type - defines possible types of a pin, valid values for
>>>+ * DPLL_A_PIN_TYPE attribute
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_TYPE_UNSPEC: unspecified value
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MUX: aggregates another layer of selectable pins
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_TYPE_EXT: external source
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_TYPE_SYNCE_ETH_PORT: ethernet port PHY's recovered clock
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_TYPE_INT_OSCILLATOR: device internal oscillator
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_TYPE_GNSS: GNSS recovered clock
>>>+ */
>>>+enum dpll_pin_type {
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_TYPE_UNSPEC,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MUX,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_TYPE_EXT,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_TYPE_SYNCE_ETH_PORT,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_TYPE_INT_OSCILLATOR,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_TYPE_GNSS,
>>>+
>>>+ __DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MAX,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MAX = (__DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MAX - 1)
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+/**
>>>+ * enum dpll_pin_direction - defines possible direction of a pin, valid
>>>values
>>>+ * for DPLL_A_PIN_DIRECTION attribute
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_UNSPEC: unspecified value
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_SOURCE: pin used as a source of a signal
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_OUTPUT: pin used to output the signal
>>>+ */
>>>+enum dpll_pin_direction {
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_UNSPEC,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_SOURCE,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_OUTPUT,
>>>+
>>>+ __DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_MAX,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_MAX = (__DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_MAX - 1)
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+#define DPLL_PIN_FREQUENCY_1_HZ 1
>>>+#define DPLL_PIN_FREQUENCY_10_MHZ 10000000
>>>+
>>>+/**
>>>+ * enum dpll_pin_state - defines possible states of a pin, valid values for
>>>+ * DPLL_A_PIN_STATE attribute
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_STATE_UNSPEC: unspecified value
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_STATE_CONNECTED: pin connected, active source of phase
>>locked loop
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_STATE_DISCONNECTED: pin disconnected, not considered as a valid
>>>+ * source
>>>+ * @DPLL_PIN_STATE_SELECTABLE: pin enabled for automatic source selection
>>>+ */
>>>+enum dpll_pin_state {
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_STATE_UNSPEC,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_STATE_CONNECTED,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_STATE_DISCONNECTED,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_STATE_SELECTABLE,
>>>+
>>>+ __DPLL_PIN_STATE_MAX,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_STATE_MAX = (__DPLL_PIN_STATE_MAX - 1)
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+/**
>>>+ * enum dpll_pin_caps - defines possible capabilities of a pin, valid
>>>flags on
>>>+ * DPLL_A_PIN_CAPS attribute
>>>+ */
>>>+enum dpll_pin_caps {
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_CAPS_DIRECTION_CAN_CHANGE = 1,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_CAPS_PRIORITY_CAN_CHANGE = 2,
>>>+ DPLL_PIN_CAPS_STATE_CAN_CHANGE = 4,
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+/**
>>>+ * enum dpll_event - events of dpll generic netlink family
>>>+ * @DPLL_EVENT_UNSPEC: invalid event type
>>>+ * @DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_CREATE: dpll device created
>>>+ * @DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_DELETE: dpll device deleted
>>>+ * @DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_CHANGE: attribute of dpll device or pin changed,
>>>reason
>>>+ * is to be found with an attribute type (DPLL_A_*) received with the
>>>event
>>>+ */
>>>+enum dpll_event {
>>>+ DPLL_EVENT_UNSPEC,
>>>+ DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_CREATE,
>>>+ DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_DELETE,
>>>+ DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_CHANGE,
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+enum dplla {
>>>+ DPLL_A_DEVICE = 1,
>>>+ DPLL_A_ID,
>>>+ DPLL_A_DEV_NAME,
>>>+ DPLL_A_BUS_NAME,
>>>+ DPLL_A_MODE,
>>>+ DPLL_A_MODE_SUPPORTED,
>>>+ DPLL_A_LOCK_STATUS,
>>>+ DPLL_A_TEMP,
>>>+ DPLL_A_CLOCK_ID,
>>>+ DPLL_A_TYPE,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_IDX,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_LABEL,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_TYPE,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_DIRECTION,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY_SUPPORTED,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY_MIN,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY_MAX,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_PRIO,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_STATE,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT_IDX,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_RCLK_DEVICE,
>>>+ DPLL_A_PIN_DPLL_CAPS,
>>>+
>>>+ __DPLL_A_MAX,
>>>+ DPLL_A_MAX = (__DPLL_A_MAX - 1)
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+enum {
>>>+ DPLL_CMD_UNSPEC = 1,
>>>+ DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET,
>>>+ DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_SET,
>>>+ DPLL_CMD_PIN_GET,
>>>+ DPLL_CMD_PIN_SET,
>>>+
>>>+ __DPLL_CMD_MAX,
>>>+ DPLL_CMD_MAX = (__DPLL_CMD_MAX - 1)
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>+#define DPLL_MCGRP_MONITOR "monitor"
>>>+
>>>+#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_DPLL_H */
>>>--
>>>2.34.1
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-11 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-28 0:20 [RFC PATCH v7 0/8] Create common DPLL configuration API Vadim Fedorenko
2023-04-28 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 1/8] dpll: spec: Add Netlink spec in YAML Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-04 12:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-04 21:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-05 10:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-11 7:44 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11 8:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-11 14:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 7:40 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11 7:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-11 20:51 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-15 9:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-16 12:05 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-16 14:33 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-18 13:24 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-18 14:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-11 15:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 20:53 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11 23:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-16 12:15 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11 7:38 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11 8:14 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-05-11 20:53 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11 15:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 20:54 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-04-28 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 2/8] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-02 15:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-06 18:47 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-03 8:09 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-06 18:50 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-04 11:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-04 20:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-06 18:55 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-04 21:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-09 12:54 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-09 13:40 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-09 12:53 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-06-13 13:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-22 14:45 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-06-09 12:51 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-04-28 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 3/8] dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-04 19:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-05 13:16 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-05 15:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 10:23 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-04-28 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 4/8] ice: add admin commands to access cgu configuration Vadim Fedorenko
2023-04-28 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 5/8] ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-03 12:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-15 22:07 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-16 6:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-18 16:06 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-19 6:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-25 9:01 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-19 6:47 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-05-25 9:05 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-15 17:12 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-16 9:22 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-16 11:46 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-18 16:07 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-19 6:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-04-28 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 6/8] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-04 9:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-05 13:43 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-06 12:42 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-04-28 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 7/8] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice Vadim Fedorenko
2023-04-28 2:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-28 10:00 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-04 20:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-05 10:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-04-28 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v7 8/8] mlx5: Implement SyncE support using DPLL infrastructure Vadim Fedorenko
2023-05-02 8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v7 0/8] Create common DPLL configuration API Jiri Pirko
2023-05-02 13:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-25 12:52 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-11 7:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-25 13:01 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-17 10:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-26 10:14 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-05-26 10:39 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-05 10:07 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZFyj5c//3NV4en12@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.michalik@intel.com \
--cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
--cc=mschmidt@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=vadfed@meta.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox