From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C4A21ACDB; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 19:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDA5412B; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 12:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-982c996a193so146725966b.3; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 12:33:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686944007; x=1689536007; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rDE4DprDtVlj2OCsSAeXNU+w16ip/BTxY/Rxz/iqhVs=; b=LytFrTDG5sr7JpHwHqn2rgW9P1VRg2NRAV0p8e7KDTz/KFaJJ031x5U0tqHLgQlRpe lYPtJvuPsi9yx4NPwOQvvj6BXMZGVocNJdXJjCagFjXWqKI3OHijFmLSfs3I7V42FusP FO6kvCNLD1nI7rjXWE8VkjAr+q83A8mGeK1vyeFPwLOJBDRgx9ew0uh2Ytsvzf113FnS TpAr6I4jMUZI30ZqBrLTG7jBDS3UW6MOyvuReOEzJoyg4JXD0tB+vULxKdC/bGMoRZSp gDQxBnYsxT/sJYFIhJg1Crv9fcQZXG4FV8cJ2mjvY3/E8OWfg+gD8xjhWAFNfPKJUQ4j Vcnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686944007; x=1689536007; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=rDE4DprDtVlj2OCsSAeXNU+w16ip/BTxY/Rxz/iqhVs=; b=lxW3HlykGQB6bqv3xZjUXY5VTj7vDp0EPnYpYr59rZFKGnK1tI/klhGkR/etqvMgYb h1lx8/XrUzTrYq4r9Vbt8BLaorryU/hoZH/6xWULyOO21bISJML+FZtT70XRPszm1K5h 3ypmolzZXUUli5fVeXQyUzNSjNTI+l5Jj2yEumhsVhuet/t43qrzlMeGrYRkzt09pEYq lpLrTyq9HWggsCUkg4zE0SxEHm0vrP76TnEvbQBUCyNv6CZk6x4HdKhRnOjMu/jZBa9w V8rNBmXTFZZADvWeW6ZzAjREgdCSHYRn6r6qOCOzn3nmhHLwArlYwQaYumuTuj1lAwap t27Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxZRuVzSsdSDxqMQZYN2WHUxw9ZGfvHI9+fae772rkKBgKfJ64U ZZZt1wJrQupIlVVnIAdmv2Oh4i6tes4AYMsm X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ74jd+VauVXSGMTiUQNjK6BL8mJP/uzGaqQY28VmE6FSZkWr37btKSwZdDJK4Ya5Ouqv9OtQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fe0e:b0:96f:f19b:887a with SMTP id wy14-20020a170906fe0e00b0096ff19b887amr2648185ejb.56.1686944006933; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 12:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tor-exit-58.for-privacy.net. [185.220.101.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lc18-20020a170906f91200b009828cf02e4esm3169556ejb.214.2023.06.16.12.33.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 16 Jun 2023 12:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 22:33:25 +0300 From: Maxim Mikityanskiy To: Saeed Mahameed Cc: Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Gal Pressman , Tariq Toukan , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/2] xdp_rxq_info_reg fixes for mlx5e Message-ID: References: <20230614090006.594909-1-maxtram95@gmail.com> <20230615223250.422eb67a@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 11:54:21 -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > On 15 Jun 22:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:00:04 +0300 Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote: > > > Marked for net-next, as I'm not sure what the consensus was, but they > > > can be applied cleanly to net as well. > > > > Sorry for lack of clarity, you should drop the fixes tags. > > If not implementing something was a bug most of the patches we merge > > would have a fixes tag. That devalues the Fixes tag completely. > > You can still ask Greg/Sasha to backport it later if you want. > > > > You don't think this should go to net ? > > The first 3 version were targeting net branch .. I don't know why Maxim > decided to switch v4 to net-next, Maybe I missed an email ? > > IMHO, I think these are net worthy since they are fixing issues with blabla, > for commits claiming to add support for blabla. I agree it's worth applying them to net, and I think it's a valid use case for "Fixes" when the original commit says "implement X" but doesn't implement X. > I already applied those earlier to my net queue and was working on > submission today, let me know if you are ok for me to send those two > patches in my today's net PR. If you were going to send these via net, that would be the best, please go ahead and ignore my v4. I resent it solely because there was no activity since February, and no one replied my ping two months ago [1]. Sorry for the noise. Thanks, Max [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZDFPCxBz0u6ClXnQ@mail.gmail.com/