From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F303AA8D
	for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:42:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172])
	by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BD955A4;
	Thu, 22 Jun 2023 02:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
	by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EF51042;
	Thu, 22 Jun 2023 02:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.25.249])
	by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B98963F663;
	Thu, 22 Jun 2023 02:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:42:12 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: next: Rpi4: Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1
Message-ID: <ZJQXdFxoBNUdutYx@FVFF77S0Q05N>
References: <CA+G9fYuifLivwhCh33kedtpU=6zUpTQ_uSkESyzdRKYp8WbTFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZJLzsWsIPD57pDgc@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netdev+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netdev+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZJLzsWsIPD57pDgc@FVFF77S0Q05N>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	lindbergh.monkeyblade.net

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 01:57:21PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 06:06:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > Following boot warnings and crashes noticed on arm64 Rpi4 device running
> > Linux next-20230621 kernel.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> > 
> > boot log:
> > 
> > [   22.331748] Kernel text patching generated an invalid instruction
> > at 0xffff8000835d6580!
> > [   22.340579] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1
> > [   22.346141] Internal error: BRK handler: 00000000f2000100 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> 
> This indicates execution of AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT.
> 
> That could be from dodgy arguments to aarch64_insn_gen_*(), or elsewhere, and
> given this is in the networking code I suspect this'll be related to BPF.
> 
> Looking at next-20230621 I see commit:
> 
>   49703aa2adfaff28 ("bpf, arm64: use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc")
> 
> ... which changed the way BPF allocates memory, and has code that pads memory
> with a bunch of AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT, so it looks like that *might* be related.

For the benefit of those just looknig at this thread, there has been some
discussion in the original thread for this commit. Summary and links below.

We identified a potential issue with missing cache maintenance:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/ZJMXqTffB22LSOkd@FVFF77S0Q05N/

Puranjay verified that was causing the problem seen here:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CANk7y0h5ucxmMz4K8sGx7qogFyx6PRxYxmFtwTRO7=0Y=B4ugw@mail.gmail.com/

Alexei has dropped this commit for now:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAADnVQJqDOMABEx8JuU6r_Dehyf=SkDfRNChx1oNfqPoo7pSrw@mail.gmail.com/

Thanks,
Mark.