From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52D08211A for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 750D41BF2 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 02:23:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-98d8c38549dso197739366b.1 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 02:23:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1687598619; x=1690190619; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EuyyoXYkLcFUjNW6aU0LWhkMHFG4qPaiZWIPRvxeeTA=; b=g66y85pUmxbEk8gM1Z1/c1SSekEW4T1k4oAFY2odQs17Fe0i5NQtNAg8YfQ0y5PXDO JQ0h5TKyFH8kEJexF4E5uUAYUUTvoLrtDbttalI/TpRRut0MeLBi39qT+qPR9h2crIJ4 twd4vI/Sgf2PrnmqyK4K7Wfk3B5izATUbxSr/5XJzNoy2H7OMyCEm4o7a+q8aRj8ALE4 dqMLqsB7Vh2D8EfuzTaNFD6MfGlIax3uCuCFL0a+TPqcfaqOdGNmhNNnmzTkV7GZQG27 WzW2S7rjCG8vBIjq8J0kwEv7E4teVB6wT4a9BZsQ0gYmst95bLhaIEBSGkJK5s+jxcOj U1Zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687598619; x=1690190619; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=EuyyoXYkLcFUjNW6aU0LWhkMHFG4qPaiZWIPRvxeeTA=; b=HDENnOkUi3uNti6kua88DgGTb8lMr7fVfT3H1nwSwDMpYnA/CgvZDzGWPHGD6JXV5K Redd1gQQTjhjigQSljrIsmrLMs0whajKcbc5wQk//2qMWqZM4+Kc3eDqgu8rYldZTw8i Qkuvh/3pBX3ku5qqSs0bgTodxAhUJ3o8VkL3QX/oDRHntbPDMZ9V7TqlMvolqb9e8asw VwT160OeD2UP4yaiM6/+ApZ/1DVbXISVrQh1Gxg2Fsv1gaWFuwnKVrQV9/D3wpgyADvC qbkVLRloC+izcPpgPCxiRQP2xvG8lIZoju8un33LJNjX3RETNXQ7rz+tDAxcmDCOMC/e uYLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDx5eRktENVvlH1IiElxH9Sr+iSJXnryHa07DkvyNxEZewTC7AHg LKbpBTbqTF8IpCRmxq21Vg/wIA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7Hm22TLuZ2uNMqorvhvVqmtSRdvFVMVJyZ7P02nHMQr1v41Obhbu8aAZ5ky21fmiU2Y7E37A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2bc8:b0:98d:758:75ed with SMTP id gv8-20020a1709072bc800b0098d075875edmr6033410ejc.75.1687598618680; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 02:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (host-213-179-129-39.customer.m-online.net. [213.179.129.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q22-20020a17090622d600b009895af2580asm671367eja.36.2023.06.24.02.23.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 24 Jun 2023 02:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 11:23:36 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski , vadfed@meta.com, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, vadfed@fb.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, javierm@redhat.com, ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com, mst@redhat.com, tzimmermann@suse.de, michal.michalik@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com, airlied@redhat.com, ogabbay@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, nipun.gupta@amd.com, axboe@kernel.dk, linux@zary.sk, masahiroy@kernel.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, geert+renesas@glider.be, milena.olech@intel.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, liuhangbin@gmail.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, andy.ren@getcruise.com, razor@blackwall.org, idosch@nvidia.com, lucien.xin@gmail.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, phil@nwl.cc, claudiajkang@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, poros@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API Message-ID: References: <20230623123820.42850-1-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com> <20230623085336.1a486ca3@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230623085336.1a486ca3@kernel.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 05:53:36PM CEST, kuba@kernel.org wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:19:11 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: >> I don't understand. The discussion in the RFCv8 thread is still going >> on. The things I mentioned there are ignored. Like for example: >> 1) mode_set op removal >> 2) odd ice dpll locking scheme (either fix or describe why it is ok - >> that's the unfinished discussion) >> 3) header file bits squash I suggested. Vadim wrote that it sounds >> reasonable, yet nothing changed >> >> I thought we are past this. Why I have to point the same issues over and >> over? > >FWIW I'm lost in the previous thread, so for me there's value in >refreshing the series. > >But you're right, at the very least there should be a summary of >outstanding issues / open items / ongoing discussions in the cover >letter. Well I would like to conclude discussion in one thread before sending the next one. What should I do? Should I start the same discussion pointing out the same issues in this thread again? This can't work. Even concluded items are ignored, like 3) IDK, this is very frustrating for me. I have to double check everything just in case it was not ignored. I don't understand this, there is no justification.