From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, petrm@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/2] devlink: Hold a reference on parent device
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 14:55:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZJgrOAmhIycWSKtU@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZJPqS0Di6Cg9JT3D@nanopsycho>
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 08:29:31AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 05:35:15PM CEST, idosch@nvidia.com wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 02:50:14PM CEST, idosch@nvidia.com wrote:
> >> >@@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ static void devlink_release(struct work_struct *work)
> >> >
> >> > mutex_destroy(&devlink->lock);
> >> > lockdep_unregister_key(&devlink->lock_key);
> >> >+ put_device(devlink->dev);
> >>
> >> In this case I think you have to make sure this is called before
> >> devlink_free() ends. After the caller of devlink_free() returns (most
> >> probably .remove callback), nothing stops module from being removed.
> >>
> >> I don't see other way. Utilize complete() here and wait_for_completion()
> >> at the end of devlink_free().
> >
> >I might be missing something, but how can I do something like
> >wait_for_completion(&devlink->comp) at the end of devlink_free()? After
> >I call devlink_put() the devlink instance can be freed and the
> >wait_for_completion() call will result in a UAF.
>
> You have to move the free() to devlink_free()
> Basically, all the things done in devlink_put that are symmetrical to
> the initialization done in devlink_alloc() should be moved there.
But it's a bit weird to dereference 'devlink' (to wait for the
completion) after calling 'devlink_put(devlink)'. Given that this
problem seems to be specific to netdevsim, don't you think it's better
to fix it in netdevsim rather than working around it in devlink?
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> If the completion in devlink_put() area rings a bell for you, let me save
> >> you the trouble looking it up:
> >> 9053637e0da7 ("devlink: remove the registration guarantee of references")
> >> This commit removed that. But it is a different usage.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > kfree(devlink);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> >@@ -204,6 +206,7 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc_ns(const struct devlink_ops *ops,
> >> > if (ret < 0)
> >> > goto err_xa_alloc;
> >> >
> >> >+ get_device(dev);
> >> > devlink->dev = dev;
> >> > devlink->ops = ops;
> >> > xa_init_flags(&devlink->ports, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
> >> >--
> >> >2.40.1
> >> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-25 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-19 12:50 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/2] devlink: Acquire device lock during reload Ido Schimmel
2023-06-19 12:50 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/2] devlink: Hold a reference on parent device Ido Schimmel
2023-06-20 6:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-20 7:05 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-06-20 17:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-21 6:31 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-06-21 19:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-22 6:03 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-06-21 11:48 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-21 15:35 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-06-22 6:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-25 11:55 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2023-06-27 10:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-19 12:50 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/2] devlink: Acquire device lock during reload Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZJgrOAmhIycWSKtU@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).