Re: [PATCH net-next 07/10] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: add safety irq support

[Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 05:26:24PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 06:23:13PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:10:26AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > The snps dwmac IP support safety features, and those Safety Feature
> > > Correctible Error and Uncorrectible Error irqs may be separate irqs.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > > index ddf9522a5dc2..bb80ca205d26 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > > @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ properties:
> > >        - description: Combined signal for various interrupt events
> > >        - description: The interrupt to manage the remote wake-up packet detection
> > >        - description: The interrupt that occurs when Rx exits the LPI state
> > > +      - description: The interrupt that occurs when Safety Feature Correctible Errors happen
> > > +      - description: The interrupt that occurs when Safety Feature Uncorrectible Errors happen
> > >  
> > >    interrupt-names:
> > >      minItems: 1
> > > @@ -114,6 +116,8 @@ properties:
> > >        - const: macirq
> > >        - enum: [eth_wake_irq, eth_lpi]
> > >        - const: eth_lpi
> > > +      - const: sfty_ce_irq
> > > +      - const: sfty_ue_irq
> > 
> > Putting _irq in an interrupt name seems rather redundant to me although,
> > clearly not the first time for it here.
> 
> It's already inconsistent, so don't follow that pattern. Drop '_irq'.

Thanks for the suggestion, will wait a bit to get more feedbacks before
sending out v2.
> 
> > 
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> 
>