From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CC0C23BD1 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 15:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A181BF6 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-993a37b79e2so901271866b.1 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:29:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1690298966; x=1690903766; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SjlrbfT1i6tI7AFt+LbMcfKublLdL5rytJvECbAgqhw=; b=3Av3W/H9AvKC2xhec4wLU32kj/ocz3g21KXV7GBjN2+pb/CcPWxxNsHubEAKO2s1VV qL4rlCWHhLNJhcn+6v8C5QObtLUPh41uYbKHJ+MlNkWxx2dXMMYw9zw+vhujizbK8HQR 9YsF2kUpTqzM84WO8JSSw0A3zBYX5Zgswlw1OX4uQ3vV5DPCzlNjyIf5g1qDGBfw9uD3 L9jFvuIHE6yOUAZIeG31nSA3brM3h3Wo9/qU3XlAs+LPe1Fn0mI2mvINcyzuX2aZIQI8 yC//Kc0nFeA9CwPhp6FaXIfwCC42X4lHvGfNEU84qUyYileAjyAh5heW1ummpI+0iH0n BFog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690298966; x=1690903766; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SjlrbfT1i6tI7AFt+LbMcfKublLdL5rytJvECbAgqhw=; b=YOV7rHD+RqjWSS1WswCriFInxuT3MK+CTi6nEEhMBCNz3hYCNUdbmwHqeRESAwXG+h g40vQZm0GPT6ehtNI7L/FPDrssBGsFhzw2hPPJGYFgQV91iGU99by2/TiGlwGNen0NOe /sX2tvJ6ZRpQl2bdQpvzVzf+LQWs4UkTH4lVKq9wwn0B3vZnJGKwOVksB4FBNmnSokhL QR76eEwwo+pY2rvEQ5x5d8WYbkLAGFvY/qr87Y0DHsCBVn6zkSuLdplw1/AX5d1uvT/n ejJmv3oZ0sVqVae/YeJ9kfyL5R5jyh1Bt+6b1nxRQPK2o2/Jf8uCb/1MlyfL4WIr8ArX 0UCA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZPQkpJZaz68EVCEGogc4dNAWt8NAnzECssGMHaCGgSafnXb5mD FL8G3aXWOPnenwzZ5TiIsjPksA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlE0hYqOUIltZnICvYfM/7nxuYFidgVxNNz28KNMxH/AG+NBkY4dQ7R3+Tzf1zDzfBAammcJIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2cf7:b0:993:f8b2:d6fa with SMTP id hz23-20020a1709072cf700b00993f8b2d6famr11234456ejc.21.1690298965867; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([91.218.191.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lv19-20020a170906bc9300b00989257be620sm8216409ejb.200.2023.07.25.08.29.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:29:23 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: Paolo Abeni Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, moshe@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, idosch@nvidia.com, petrm@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 00/11] devlink: introduce dump selector attr and use it for per-instance dumps Message-ID: References: <20230720121829.566974-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <87ca1394a3110cad376d9bfb6d576f0f90674a2d.camel@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ca1394a3110cad376d9bfb6d576f0f90674a2d.camel@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:36:31AM CEST, pabeni@redhat.com wrote: >On Tue, 2023-07-25 at 10:07 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> I see that this patchset got moved to "changes requested" in patchwork. >> Why exacly? There was no comment so far. Petr's splat is clearly not >> caused by this patchset. > >Quickly skimming over the series I agree the reported splat looks >possibly more related to core netlink and/or rhashtable but it would >help if you could express your reasoning on the splat itself, possibly >with a decoded back-trace. > Well, since I'm touching only devlink, this is underlated to this patchset. I don't see why I would need to care about the splat. I will repost, if that is ok. >Thanks! > >Paolo >> >