netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: do not match device when remove source route
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 14:42:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLZ6ipKWo1dSW8Xc@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230718065253.2730396-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 02:52:53PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> After deleting an IPv6 address on an interface and cleaning up the
> related preferred source entries, it is important to ensure that all
> routes associated with the deleted address are properly cleared. The
> current implementation of rt6_remove_prefsrc() only checks the preferred
> source addresses bound to the current device. However, there may be
> routes that are bound to other devices but still utilize the same
> preferred source address.
> 
> To address this issue, it is necessary to also delete entries that are
> bound to other interfaces but share the same source address with the
> current device. Failure to delete these entries would leave routes that
> are bound to the deleted address unclear. Here is an example reproducer
> (I have omitted unrelated routes):

[...]

> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 64e873f5895f..ab8c364e323c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -4607,7 +4607,6 @@ void rt6_remove_prefsrc(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
>  {
>  	struct net *net = dev_net(ifp->idev->dev);
>  	struct arg_dev_net_ip adni = {
> -		.dev = ifp->idev->dev,

Wouldn't this affect routes in different VRFs?

See commit 5a56a0b3a45d ("net: Don't delete routes in different VRFs")
and related fixes:

8a2618e14f81 ipv4: Fix incorrect table ID in IOCTL path
c0d999348e01 ipv4: Fix incorrect route flushing when table ID 0 is used
f96a3d74554d ipv4: Fix incorrect route flushing when source address is deleted
e0a312629fef ipv4: Fix table id reference in fib_sync_down_addr

Anyway, please add tests to tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh

>  		.net = net,
>  		.addr = &ifp->addr,
>  	};
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-18 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18  6:52 [PATCH net] ipv6: do not match device when remove source route Hangbin Liu
2023-07-18 11:42 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2023-07-19  7:21   ` Hangbin Liu
2023-07-19  7:56     ` Hangbin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZLZ6ipKWo1dSW8Xc@shredder \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=thaller@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).