From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] nexthop: Factor out hash threshold fdb nexthop selection
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:54:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLfrG3Layt4fUmt8@d3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d030c097-ac93-eed4-5bdd-11f902b16fca@kernel.org>
On 2023-05-30 08:57 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 5/29/23 2:19 PM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
> > index f95142e56da0..27089dea0ed0 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
> > @@ -1152,11 +1152,31 @@ static bool ipv4_good_nh(const struct fib_nh *nh)
> > return !!(state & NUD_VALID);
> > }
> >
> > +static struct nexthop *nexthop_select_path_fdb(struct nh_group *nhg, int hash)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nhg->num_nh; i++) {
> > + struct nh_grp_entry *nhge = &nhg->nh_entries[i];
> > +
> > + if (hash > atomic_read(&nhge->hthr.upper_bound))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + return nhge->nh;
> > + }
> > +
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>
> I do not see how the stack is going to provide useful information; it
> should always be vxlan_xmit ... nexthop_select_path_fdb, right?
Not always, it is also possible to have a resilient nhg with fdb
nexthops. In that case, nexthop_select_path_fdb() is not called. In
practice, I tried such a configuration and it does not work well. I have
prepared a fix that I'll send after the current series has been dealt
with.
Sorry for the long delay before my reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-19 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-29 20:19 [PATCH net-next 0/4] nexthop: Refactor and fix nexthop selection for multipath routes Benjamin Poirier
2023-05-29 20:19 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] nexthop: Factor out hash threshold fdb nexthop selection Benjamin Poirier
2023-05-30 14:57 ` David Ahern
2023-07-19 13:54 ` Benjamin Poirier [this message]
2023-05-29 20:19 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] nexthop: Factor out neighbor validity check Benjamin Poirier
2023-05-30 14:58 ` David Ahern
2023-05-29 20:19 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] nexthop: Do not return invalid nexthop object during multipath selection Benjamin Poirier
2023-05-30 15:08 ` David Ahern
2023-05-31 6:04 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-29 20:19 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: net: Add test cases for nexthop groups with invalid neighbors Benjamin Poirier
2023-05-30 15:10 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZLfrG3Layt4fUmt8@d3 \
--to=bpoirier@nvidia.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).