From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net] ipv6: do not match device when remove source route
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:51:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMjx2D3AD81hvDGp@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230725102137.299305-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 06:21:37PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 64e873f5895f..44e980109e30 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -4590,10 +4590,10 @@ static int fib6_remove_prefsrc(struct fib6_info *rt, void *arg)
> struct net_device *dev = ((struct arg_dev_net_ip *)arg)->dev;
> struct net *net = ((struct arg_dev_net_ip *)arg)->net;
> struct in6_addr *addr = ((struct arg_dev_net_ip *)arg)->addr;
> + u32 tb6_id = l3mdev_fib_table(dev) ? : RT_TABLE_MAIN;
>
> - if (!rt->nh &&
> - ((void *)rt->fib6_nh->fib_nh_dev == dev || !dev) &&
> - rt != net->ipv6.fib6_null_entry &&
> + if (rt != net->ipv6.fib6_null_entry &&
> + rt->fib6_table->tb6_id == tb6_id &&
> ipv6_addr_equal(addr, &rt->fib6_prefsrc.addr)) {
> spin_lock_bh(&rt6_exception_lock);
> /* remove prefsrc entry */
> @@ -4611,7 +4611,9 @@ void rt6_remove_prefsrc(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
> .net = net,
> .addr = &ifp->addr,
> };
> - fib6_clean_all(net, fib6_remove_prefsrc, &adni);
> +
> + if (!ipv6_chk_addr_and_flags(net, adni.addr, adni.dev, true, 0, IFA_F_TENTATIVE))
Setting 'skip_dev_check' to true is problematic since when a link-local
address is deleted from a device, it should be removed as the preferred
source address from routes using the device as their nexthop device,
even if this address is configured on other devices.
You can't configure a route with a link-local preferred source address
if the address is not configured on the nexthop device:
# ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
# ip link add name dummy2 up type dummy
# ip -6 address add fe80::1/128 dev dummy1
# ip -6 route add 2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1
Error: Invalid source address.
# ip -6 address add fe80::1/128 dev dummy2
# ip -6 route add 2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:1::/64
2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1 metric 1024 pref medium
But if I now delete the address from dummy2, the preferred source
address still exists:
# ip -6 address del fe80::1/128 dev dummy2
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:1::/64
2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1 metric 1024 pref medium
Setting 'skip_dev_check' to false will solve this problem:
# ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
# ip link add name dummy2 up type dummy
# ip -6 address add fe80::1/128 dev dummy1
# ip -6 address add fe80::1/128 dev dummy2
# ip -6 route add 2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:1::/64
2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1 metric 1024 pref medium
# ip -6 address del fe80::1/128 dev dummy2
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:1::/64
2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy2 metric 1024 pref medium
But will create another problem where when such an address is deleted it
also affects routes that shouldn't be affected:
# ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
# ip link add name dummy2 up type dummy
# ip -6 address add fe80::1/128 dev dummy1
# ip -6 address add fe80::1/128 dev dummy2
# ip -6 route add 2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy1 src fe80::1
# ip -6 route add 2001:db8:2::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:1::/64
2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy1 src fe80::1 metric 1024 pref medium
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:2::/64
2001:db8:2::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1 metric 1024 pref medium
# ip -6 address del fe80::1/128 dev dummy2
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:1::/64
2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy1 metric 1024 pref medium
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:2::/64
2001:db8:2::/64 dev dummy2 metric 1024 pref medium
So, I think we need to call ipv6_chk_addr() from rt6_remove_prefsrc() to
be consistent with the addition path in ip6_route_info_create():
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 56a55585eb79..e7e2187bff0c 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -4591,11 +4591,13 @@ static int fib6_remove_prefsrc(struct fib6_info *rt, void *arg)
struct net_device *dev = ((struct arg_dev_net_ip *)arg)->dev;
struct net *net = ((struct arg_dev_net_ip *)arg)->net;
struct in6_addr *addr = ((struct arg_dev_net_ip *)arg)->addr;
+ u32 tb6_id = l3mdev_fib_table(dev) ? : RT_TABLE_MAIN;
if (!rt->nh &&
- ((void *)rt->fib6_nh->fib_nh_dev == dev || !dev) &&
rt != net->ipv6.fib6_null_entry &&
- ipv6_addr_equal(addr, &rt->fib6_prefsrc.addr)) {
+ rt->fib6_table->tb6_id == tb6_id &&
+ ipv6_addr_equal(addr, &rt->fib6_prefsrc.addr) &&
+ !ipv6_chk_addr(net, addr, rt->fib6_nh->fib_nh_dev, 0)) {
spin_lock_bh(&rt6_exception_lock);
/* remove prefsrc entry */
rt->fib6_prefsrc.plen = 0;
ipv6_chk_addr() is not cheap, but it's only called for routes that match
the previous criteria.
With the above patch, the previous test cases now work as expected:
# ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
# ip link add name dummy2 up type dummy
# ip -6 address add fe80::1/128 dev dummy1
# ip -6 address add fe80::1/128 dev dummy2
# ip -6 route add 2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:1::/64
2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1 metric 1024 pref medium
# ip -6 address del fe80::1/128 dev dummy2
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:1::/64
2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy2 metric 1024 pref medium
# ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
# ip link add name dummy2 up type dummy
# ip -6 address add fe80::1/128 dev dummy1
# ip -6 address add fe80::1/128 dev dummy2
# ip -6 route add 2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy1 src fe80::1
# ip -6 route add 2001:db8:2::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:1::/64
2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy1 src fe80::1 metric 1024 pref medium
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:2::/64
2001:db8:2::/64 dev dummy2 src fe80::1 metric 1024 pref medium
# ip -6 address del fe80::1/128 dev dummy2
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:1::/64
2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy1 src fe80::1 metric 1024 pref medium
# ip -6 route show 2001:db8:2::/64
2001:db8:2::/64 dev dummy2 metric 1024 pref medium
There is however one failure in the selftest:
# ./fib_tests.sh -t ipv6_del_addr
IPv6 delete address route tests
Regular FIB info
TEST: Prefsrc removed from VRF when source address deleted [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc in default VRF not removed [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc removed in default VRF when source address deleted [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc in VRF is not removed by address delete [ OK ]
Identical FIB info with different table ID
TEST: Prefsrc removed from VRF when source address deleted [FAIL]
TEST: Prefsrc in default VRF not removed [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc removed in default VRF when source address deleted [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc in VRF is not removed by address delete [ OK ]
Table ID 0
TEST: Prefsrc removed in default VRF when source address deleted [ OK ]
Identical address on different devices
TEST: Prefsrc not removed when src address exists on other device [ OK ]
Tests passed: 9
Tests failed: 1
Which is basically:
# ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
# ip link add name dummy2 up type dummy
# ip link add red type vrf table 1111
# ip link set dev red up
# ip link set dummy2 vrf red
# ip -6 address add dev dummy1 2001:db8:104::12/64
# ip -6 address add dev dummy2 2001:db8:104::12/64
# ip -6 route add 2001:db8:106::/64 dev lo src 2001:db8:104::12
# ip -6 route add vrf red 2001:db8:106::/64 dev lo src 2001:db8:104::12
# ip -6 address del dev dummy2 2001:db8:104::12/64
# ip -6 route show vrf red | grep "src 2001:db8:104::12"
2001:db8:106::/64 dev lo src 2001:db8:104::12 metric 1024 pref medium
I'm not sure it's realistic to expect the source address to be removed
when the address is deleted from dummy2, given that user space was only
able to configure the route because the address was available on dummy1
in the default vrf:
# ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
# ip link add name dummy2 up type dummy
# ip link add red type vrf table 1111
# ip link set dev red up
# ip link set dummy2 vrf red
# ip -6 address add dev dummy2 2001:db8:104::12/64
# ip -6 route add vrf red 2001:db8:106::/64 dev lo src 2001:db8:104::12
Error: Invalid source address.
Anyway, given that this patch does not fix a regression and the on-going
discussion around the semantics, I suggest to target future versions at
net-next.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 10:21 [PATCHv4 net] ipv6: do not match device when remove source route Hangbin Liu
2023-07-31 20:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-01 11:51 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2023-08-03 4:15 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-08-10 9:06 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-08-11 9:01 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-08-03 7:45 ` Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMjx2D3AD81hvDGp@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox