From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, moshe@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com,
idosch@nvidia.com, petrm@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 11/11] devlink: extend health reporter dump selector by port index
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:04:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMoAGbFufprqV2FS@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230801085644.7be5b2e4@kernel.org>
Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:56:44PM CEST, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:49:45 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >for_each_obj() {
>> > if (obj_dump_filtered(obj, dump_info)) // < run filter
>> > continue; // < skip object
>> >
>> > dump_one(obj)
>>
>> I don't see how this would help. For example, passing PORT_INDEX, I know
>> exactly what object to reach, according to this PORT_INDEX. Why to
>> iterate over all of them and try the filter? Does not make sense to me.
>>
>> Maybe we are each understanding this feature differently. This is about
>> passing keys which index the objects. It is always devlink handle,
>> sometimes port index and I see another example in shared buffer index.
>> That's about it. Basically user passes partial tuple of indexes.
>> Example:
>> devlink port show
>> the key is: bus_name/dev_name/port_index
>> user passes bus_name/dev_name, this is the selector, a partial key.
>>
>> The sophisticated filtering is not a focus of this patchset. User can do
>> it putting bpf filter on the netlink socket.
>
>Okay, I was trying to be helpful, I don't want to argue for
>a particular implementation. IMO what's posted is too ugly
>to be merged, please restructure it.
Ugly in which sense? What exactly needs to be restructured?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-02 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-20 12:18 [patch net-next v2 00/11] devlink: introduce dump selector attr and use it for per-instance dumps Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 01/11] devlink: parse linecard attr in doit() callbacks Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 02/11] devlink: parse rate attrs " Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 03/11] devlink: introduce __devlink_nl_pre_doit() with internal flags as function arg Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 04/11] devlink: convert port get command to split ops Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 05/11] devlink: convert health reporter " Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 06/11] devlink: convert param " Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 07/11] devlink: convert trap " Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 08/11] devlink: introduce set of macros and use it for split ops definitions Jiri Pirko
2023-07-25 17:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-31 12:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-07-31 16:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-01 6:41 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 09/11] devlink: convert rest of the iterator dumpit commands to split ops Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 10/11] devlink: introduce dump selector attr and use it for per-instance dumps Jiri Pirko
2023-07-25 18:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-31 12:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-07-31 17:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-01 6:42 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-01 15:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-02 7:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 12:18 ` [patch net-next v2 11/11] devlink: extend health reporter dump selector by port index Jiri Pirko
2023-07-25 18:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-31 12:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-07-31 17:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-01 6:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-01 15:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-02 7:04 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-07-20 13:55 ` [patch net-next v2 00/11] devlink: introduce dump selector attr and use it for per-instance dumps Petr Machata
2023-07-20 14:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-07-20 14:51 ` Petr Machata
2023-07-25 8:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-07-25 8:36 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-07-25 15:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-07-25 16:39 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMoAGbFufprqV2FS@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).