From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] IPv4: add extack info for IPv4 address add/delete
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 18:06:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZN43j89A388r5NdW@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230817032815.1675525-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 11:28:15AM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Add extack info for IPv4 address add/delete, which would be useful for
> users to understand the problem without having to read kernel code.
>
> No extack message for the ifa_local checking in __inet_insert_ifa() as
> it has been checked in find_matching_ifa().
>
> Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Thanks for the follow-up. A couple of minor comments below.
> ---
> net/ipv4/devinet.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> index 5deac0517ef7..40f90d01ce0e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> @@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ static int __inet_insert_ifa(struct in_ifaddr *ifa, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> return -EEXIST;
> }
> if (ifa1->ifa_scope != ifa->ifa_scope) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: Invalid scope value");
> inet_free_ifa(ifa);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -664,6 +665,7 @@ static int inet_rtm_deladdr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
> in_dev = inetdev_by_index(net, ifm->ifa_index);
> if (!in_dev) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: Device not found");
> err = -ENODEV;
> goto errout;
> }
> @@ -688,6 +690,7 @@ static int inet_rtm_deladdr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> return 0;
> }
>
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: Address not found");
> err = -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> errout:
> return err;
> @@ -839,13 +842,23 @@ static struct in_ifaddr *rtm_to_ifaddr(struct net *net, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>
> ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
> err = -EINVAL;
> - if (ifm->ifa_prefixlen > 32 || !tb[IFA_LOCAL])
> +
> + if (ifm->ifa_prefixlen > 32) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "IPv4: Invalid prefix length");
s/IPv4/ipv4/
To be consistent with the rest and IPv6.
> + goto errout;
> + }
> +
> + if (!tb[IFA_LOCAL]) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: Local address is not supplied");
> goto errout;
> + }
>
> dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifm->ifa_index);
> err = -ENODEV;
> - if (!dev)
> + if (!dev) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: Device not found");
> goto errout;
> + }
>
> in_dev = __in_dev_get_rtnl(dev);
> err = -ENOBUFS;
> @@ -896,7 +909,14 @@ static struct in_ifaddr *rtm_to_ifaddr(struct net *net, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> struct ifa_cacheinfo *ci;
>
> ci = nla_data(tb[IFA_CACHEINFO]);
> - if (!ci->ifa_valid || ci->ifa_prefered > ci->ifa_valid) {
IPv6 just says for both "address lifetime invalid"
> + if (!ci->ifa_valid) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: valid_lft is zero");
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto errout_free;
> + }
> +
> + if (ci->ifa_prefered > ci->ifa_valid) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: preferred_lft is greater than valid_lft");
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto errout_free;
> }
> @@ -954,6 +974,7 @@ static int inet_rtm_newaddr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> int ret = ip_mc_autojoin_config(net, true, ifa);
>
> if (ret < 0) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: Multicast auto join failed");
> inet_free_ifa(ifa);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -967,8 +988,10 @@ static int inet_rtm_newaddr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> inet_free_ifa(ifa);
>
> if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL ||
> - !(nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE))
> + !(nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: Address already assigned");
> return -EEXIST;
> + }
> ifa = ifa_existing;
>
> if (ifa->ifa_rt_priority != new_metric) {
> --
> 2.38.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-17 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-17 3:28 [PATCH net-next] IPv4: add extack info for IPv4 address add/delete Hangbin Liu
2023-08-17 15:06 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZN43j89A388r5NdW@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox