From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03BA314AA7 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2948AC433C8; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:06:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692345968; bh=DfL6ELNpmiDiKZgEEu9kk86DoHbt3AbGnuiaZBqEfzc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=er/nFVBlQXYKGAhI98JCOsNprVwbhZD5YmsrEp8uG4KNxT0JOHJYqZOCi8lwhhaxV y4SEiKc0M8mFonSRZnTqG0aEteyYrgscDelNYOI6hn7Sj425/Q753DcA4RjgftjaLQ 9eWNNJHlBdm65CxSU7AEGdZHOr0OdVVXt1LiZJyasDDdhNvnGKhdUiuYiDKENGHDBm P8/Q/zORxkTNMX+IPB4Y2xsaUernZwXlBhXRvkYDC/RaDT6UihMASluuR7Zeix31YX n8zlSCExAqOwI5X8TW3g3OT6OcF9b+ZcvdIUEMLuKjRM3S0vE63Emg0gjRYVVZEHma S9NwsosO0FVNw== Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:06:04 +0200 From: Simon Horman To: Patrick Rohr Cc: "David S. Miller" , Linux Network Development Mailing List , Maciej =?utf-8?Q?=C5=BBenczykowski?= , Lorenzo Colitti , David Ahern Subject: Re: [netdev-next] net: release reference to inet6_dev pointer Message-ID: References: <20230816220203.1865432-1-prohr@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230816220203.1865432-1-prohr@google.com> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 03:02:03PM -0700, Patrick Rohr wrote: > addrconf_prefix_rcv returned early without releasing the inet6_dev > pointer when the PIO lifetime is less than accept_ra_min_lft. > > Fixes: 5027d54a9c30 ("net: change accept_ra_min_rtr_lft to affect all RA lifetimes") > Cc: Maciej Żenczykowski > Cc: Lorenzo Colitti > Cc: David Ahern > Signed-off-by: Patrick Rohr Hi Patrick, this patch looks good to me, but unfortunately our CI got a bit confused and tried to apply it to net, where it does not apply because the cited commit is not present there, rather than net-next, where it does apply. This creates a process issue for us. I think it would be useful if you could repost the patch with it targeted at net-next: Subject: [PATCH net-next] ... Please feel free to include: Reviewed-by: Simon Horman -- pw-bot: changes-requested