From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5651C2D6 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 08:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8001A170B for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 01:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3fe4a89e8c4so19558915e9.3 for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 01:11:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1691395876; x=1692000676; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=N0qYRLhjDJL7Pu5pLEH8TGtQxZMDB4c7QmZ9lm0OIUQ=; b=cEfe6XvkFp1M44Cikps2bjZz5YJnd9TXncqXN56J61bLMbPNtW1M4PqgKz/XNgjH7y 6+jnO0qJt85mEySNEmuv6mpz34HcJTiDpnAzUJ/g+nToy60LFMfBtvR1JZHdbJmukTen 5Iv8GaIYakqS7GZ5yzC1+HI839t+Q0mLcelAa0AJ9kGZ8aM2OFZbv1YMil4kK21voiik kPRJ8ulVb64E2PsjCvSguHBkTJl+XzAaOMiWA0QzGBGdUVvwc3YnBQzMxjSeomWjFzZl jmHTp2F3bdwzQEPGEp8YUX7DOQSzSewI/IjkCd1nE8I2n0QU8gPJx+M10/eX0TGvY3vq bJQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691395876; x=1692000676; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=N0qYRLhjDJL7Pu5pLEH8TGtQxZMDB4c7QmZ9lm0OIUQ=; b=cqRWmaPuTOIg3l+jE0C7ezyviKsjmh1L16SuzEe02EkqRXmZQAf2+NZ4MeBiYLSrjE ddaO6fUt82VVXjTcwpA3v2HMzO0eGiIo9RfZETHntSSmTOmq+mAubflDF5UF7YSis2Hh 5j9OQlX1HL7bO40WY53zFyDeXfeInkeR3Olx35s0f+wmLgTzUGuiiY0Cw9/Rji0zxFdm AGKAy9mWrevAUNkfXRjjSinl26TE+7OGlJ0+x5BD81IDVy6/9cSXBvQJoDMoFZXh0DEN VlyVUxjmtkhLXvEYE6/FOC4RsEtgcEl1har9iKNLA1ycMg46XO8A3C0MApslWfMC5kxf YWpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxEPsNbZXyaYsUgGVjZmztKPeNtUESRZer4FaqMTlnSPyn3jHMN AufkbtsOpf8KLi4N7qpsbhsFdQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEEdHTr4GqkRd3deEQMZXM1fJczL0sbYRdmLfTsQ9mLjt9yFpcg6J6A5IYmi2REfTncCjo2WA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:208:b0:3fe:1f80:7d92 with SMTP id 8-20020a05600c020800b003fe1f807d92mr5507969wmi.8.1691395875864; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 01:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([212.23.236.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l24-20020a7bc458000000b003fe20db88ebsm9914745wmi.31.2023.08.07.01.11.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Aug 2023 01:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:11:14 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: Vadim Fedorenko Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Arkadiusz Kubalewski , Jonathan Lemon , Paolo Abeni , Milena Olech , Michal Michalik , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, poros@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] dpll: netlink: Add DPLL framework base functions Message-ID: References: <20230804190454.394062-1-vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev> <20230804190454.394062-5-vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230804190454.394062-5-vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 09:04:49PM CEST, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev wrote: >DPLL framework is used to represent and configure DPLL devices >in systems. Each device that has DPLL and can configure inputs >and outputs can use this framework. > >Implement dpll netlink framework functions for enablement of dpll >subsystem netlink family. > >Co-developed-by: Milena Olech >Signed-off-by: Milena Olech >Co-developed-by: Michal Michalik >Signed-off-by: Michal Michalik >Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko >Co-developed-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski >Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski Besides couple of small nits below, looks fine to me. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko [...] >+static int >+dpll_pin_freq_set(struct dpll_pin *pin, struct nlattr *a, >+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) >+{ >+ u64 freq = nla_get_u64(a); >+ struct dpll_pin_ref *ref; >+ unsigned long i; >+ int ret; >+ >+ if (!dpll_pin_is_freq_supported(pin, freq)) { >+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "not supported freq:%llu on pin:%u", Please remove "pin%u". User knows on which object he is operating. >+ freq, pin->id); >+ return -EINVAL; >+ } >+ >+ xa_for_each(&pin->dpll_refs, i, ref) { >+ const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref); >+ struct dpll_device *dpll = ref->dpll; >+ >+ if (!ops->frequency_set) >+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; >+ ret = ops->frequency_set(pin, dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin), >+ dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), freq, extack); >+ if (ret) >+ return ret; >+ __dpll_pin_change_ntf(pin); >+ } >+ >+ return 0; >+} >+ >+static int >+dpll_pin_on_pin_state_set(struct dpll_pin *pin, u32 parent_idx, >+ enum dpll_pin_state state, >+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) >+{ >+ struct dpll_pin_ref *parent_ref; >+ const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops; >+ struct dpll_pin_ref *dpll_ref; >+ void *pin_priv, *parent_priv; >+ struct dpll_pin *parent; >+ unsigned long i; >+ int ret; >+ >+ if (!(DPLL_PIN_CAPS_STATE_CAN_CHANGE & pin->prop->capabilities)) { >+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "pin:%u not allowed to change state", Please remove "pin%u". User knows on which object he is operating. >+ pin->id); >+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; >+ } >+ parent = xa_load(&dpll_pin_xa, parent_idx); >+ if (!parent) >+ return -EINVAL; >+ parent_ref = xa_load(&pin->parent_refs, parent->pin_idx); >+ if (!parent_ref) >+ return -EINVAL; >+ xa_for_each(&parent->dpll_refs, i, dpll_ref) { >+ ops = dpll_pin_ops(parent_ref); >+ if (!ops->state_on_pin_set) >+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; >+ pin_priv = dpll_pin_on_pin_priv(parent, pin); >+ parent_priv = dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll_ref->dpll, parent); >+ ret = ops->state_on_pin_set(pin, pin_priv, parent, parent_priv, >+ state, extack); >+ if (ret) >+ return ret; >+ } >+ __dpll_pin_change_ntf(pin); >+ >+ return 0; >+} >+ >+static int >+dpll_pin_state_set(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin, >+ enum dpll_pin_state state, >+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) >+{ >+ const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops; >+ struct dpll_pin_ref *ref; >+ int ret; >+ >+ if (!(DPLL_PIN_CAPS_STATE_CAN_CHANGE & pin->prop->capabilities)) { >+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "pin:%u not allowed to change state", Please remove "pin%u". User knows on which object he is operating. >+ pin->id); >+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; >+ } >+ ref = xa_load(&pin->dpll_refs, dpll->device_idx); >+ ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ref); >+ ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref); >+ if (!ops->state_on_dpll_set) >+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; >+ ret = ops->state_on_dpll_set(pin, dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin), >+ dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), state, extack); >+ if (ret) >+ return ret; >+ __dpll_pin_change_ntf(pin); >+ >+ return 0; >+} >+ >+static int >+dpll_pin_prio_set(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin, >+ u32 prio, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) >+{ >+ const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops; >+ struct dpll_pin_ref *ref; >+ int ret; >+ >+ if (!(DPLL_PIN_CAPS_PRIORITY_CAN_CHANGE & pin->prop->capabilities)) { >+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "pin:%u not allowed to change prio", Please remove "pin%u". User knows on which object he is operating. >+ pin->id); >+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; >+ } >+ ref = xa_load(&pin->dpll_refs, dpll->device_idx); >+ ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ref); >+ ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref); >+ if (!ops->prio_set) >+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; >+ ret = ops->prio_set(pin, dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin), dpll, >+ dpll_priv(dpll), prio, extack); >+ if (ret) >+ return ret; >+ __dpll_pin_change_ntf(pin); >+ >+ return 0; >+} >+ >+static int >+dpll_pin_direction_set(struct dpll_pin *pin, struct dpll_device *dpll, >+ enum dpll_pin_direction direction, >+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) >+{ >+ const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops; >+ struct dpll_pin_ref *ref; >+ int ret; >+ >+ if (!(DPLL_PIN_CAPS_DIRECTION_CAN_CHANGE & pin->prop->capabilities)) { >+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, >+ "pin:%u not allowed to change direction", Please remove "pin%u". User knows on which object he is operating. >+ pin->id); >+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; >+ } >+ ref = xa_load(&pin->dpll_refs, dpll->device_idx); >+ ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ref); >+ ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref); >+ if (!ops->direction_set) >+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; >+ ret = ops->direction_set(pin, dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin), >+ dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), direction, extack); >+ if (ret) >+ return ret; >+ __dpll_pin_change_ntf(pin); >+ >+ return 0; >+} >+ [...] >+static int >+dpll_pin_set_from_nlattr(struct dpll_pin *pin, struct genl_info *info) >+{ >+ int rem, ret = -EINVAL; >+ struct nlattr *a; >+ >+ nla_for_each_attr(a, genlmsg_data(info->genlhdr), >+ genlmsg_len(info->genlhdr), rem) { >+ switch (nla_type(a)) { >+ case DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY: >+ ret = dpll_pin_freq_set(pin, a, info->extack); >+ if (ret) >+ return ret; >+ break; >+ case DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT_DEVICE: >+ ret = dpll_pin_parent_device_set(pin, a, info->extack); >+ if (ret) >+ return ret; >+ break; >+ case DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT_PIN: >+ ret = dpll_pin_parent_pin_set(pin, a, info->extack); >+ if (ret) >+ return ret; >+ break; >+ case DPLL_A_PIN_ID: >+ case DPLL_A_ID: >+ break; >+ default: >+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(info->extack, >+ "unsupported attribute (%d)", >+ nla_type(a)); How exactly this could happen? I mean, we have strict parsing on, the policy checking during parse ensures no unknown attr is seen here. Please remove this "default" section. >+ return -EINVAL; >+ } >+ } >+ >+ return 0; >+} >+ [...]