Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] bonding: remove unnecessary NULL check in debugfs function

[Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 09:13:31AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> On 8/9/23, Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com> wrote:
> > Because debugfs_create_dir returns ERR_PTR, so bonding_debug_root will
> > never be NULL. Remove unnecessary NULL check for bonding_debug_root in
> > debugfs function.
> 
> So after this change it will call debugfs_create_dir(), et al, with
> the ERR_PTR value?  Granted, the current behavior is probably not
> right, but I don't see how this makes things better.

I guess Zhengchao means to remove Redundant checks? The later
debugfs_create_dir/debugfs_remove_recursive/debugfs_remove_recursive functions
will check the dentry with IS_ERR(). But I think the commit description need
an update.

Hangbin

> 
> -J
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c | 9 ---------
> >  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> > b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> > index e4e7f4ee48e0..4c83f89c0a47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> > @@ -49,9 +49,6 @@ DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(bond_debug_rlb_hash);
> >
> >  void bond_debug_register(struct bonding *bond)
> >  {
> > -	if (!bonding_debug_root)
> > -		return;
> > -
> >  	bond->debug_dir =
> >  		debugfs_create_dir(bond->dev->name, bonding_debug_root);
> >
> > @@ -61,9 +58,6 @@ void bond_debug_register(struct bonding *bond)
> >
> >  void bond_debug_unregister(struct bonding *bond)
> >  {
> > -	if (!bonding_debug_root)
> > -		return;
> > -
> >  	debugfs_remove_recursive(bond->debug_dir);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -71,9 +65,6 @@ void bond_debug_reregister(struct bonding *bond)
> >  {
> >  	struct dentry *d;
> >
> > -	if (!bonding_debug_root)
> > -		return;
> > -
> >  	d = debugfs_rename(bonding_debug_root, bond->debug_dir,
> >  			   bonding_debug_root, bond->dev->name);
> >  	if (!IS_ERR(d)) {
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >