netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bjorn@kernel.org,
	 magnus.karlsson@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
	 jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	 pabeni@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@linux.dev,  dan.carpenter@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] xsk: fix xsk_build_skb() error: 'skb' dereferencing possible ERR_PTR()
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:15:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNUpT+yI/OrLnxKy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810165223.1870882-1-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>

On 08/10, Tirthendu Sarkar wrote:
> xsk_build_skb_zerocopy() may return an error other than -EAGAIN and this
> is received as skb and used later in xsk_set_destructor_arg() and
> xsk_drop_skb() which must operate on a valid skb.
> 
> Add new parameter to xsk_build_skb_zerocopy() to explicitly return error
> and invoke xsk_set_destructor_arg() and xsk_drop_skb() only for a valid
> skb.

Maybe I'm missing something, but seems more complex that it should.
Why not do the following instead?

	} else if (!IS_ERR(skb)) {
  		xsk_set_destructor_arg(skb);
  		xsk_drop_skb(skb);
  		xskq_cons_release(xs->tx);
	}

Why do we need to separate the err?

      reply	other threads:[~2023-08-10 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-10 16:52 [PATCH bpf-next] xsk: fix xsk_build_skb() error: 'skb' dereferencing possible ERR_PTR() Tirthendu Sarkar
2023-08-10 18:15 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZNUpT+yI/OrLnxKy@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).