netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, dsterba@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: use SLAB_NO_MERGE for kmem_cache skbuff_head_cache
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:53:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNufkkauiS20IIJw@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <169211265663.1491038.8580163757548985946.stgit@firesoul>

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 05:17:36PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> For the bulk API to perform efficiently the slub fragmentation need to
> be low. Especially for the SLUB allocator, the efficiency of bulk free
> API depend on objects belonging to the same slab (page).

Hey Jesper,

You probably haven't seen this patch series from Vlastimil:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230810163627.6206-9-vbabka@suse.cz/

I wonder if you'd like to give it a try?  It should provide some immunity
to this problem, and might even be faster than the current approach.
If it isn't, it'd be good to understand why, and if it could be improved.

No objection to this patch going in for now, of course.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-15 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-15 15:17 [PATCH net] net: use SLAB_NO_MERGE for kmem_cache skbuff_head_cache Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-08-15 15:53 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-08-18 12:32   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-08-18 15:20     ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-08-18 15:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-08-18 16:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18 19:59   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-08-18 22:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-08-21 13:55 ` Alexander Lobakin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZNufkkauiS20IIJw@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).