From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <Vincent.Whitchurch@axis.com>
Cc: "alexandre.torgue@st.com" <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
"nbd@nbd.name" <nbd@nbd.name>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"joabreu@synopsys.com" <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"peppe.cavallaro@st.com" <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Use hrtimer for TX coalescing
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:05:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZO-E2_A-UrC9127S@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3c70b8e345a174817e6a7f38725d958f8193bf1.camel@axis.com>
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 14:55:37 +0000, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> Any test results with this patch on the hardware with the performance
> problems would be appreciated.
TL/DR: it's definitely better than without the patch, but still worse
than fully reverting hrtimer [1].
OpenWrt on Netgear R7800, iperf3 test in both directions (LAN->WAN and
WAN->LAN), 3 runs for the duration of 1 minute each. OpenWrt options
packet_steering (RPS + XPS) and flow_offloading (flowtables) enabled,
irqbalance disabled.
Numbers in Mbit/s, I had to fit the table into 72 characters, so:
U is the original kernel 6.1.46 from OpenWrt, R is reverted hrtimer
(patch [1]), P is patched with the new patch from the previous email,
^ is upload (LAN->WAN), v is download (WAN->LAN).
| ^ | v | ^ | v | ^ | v | avg ^ | avg v | std ^ | std v
- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----
U | 742 | 709 | 740 | 715 | 556 | 750 | 679 | 725 | 107 | 22
R | 931 | 938 | 935 | 939 | 935 | 939 | 934 | 939 | 2 | 1
P | 845 | 939 | 934 | 939 | 845 | 909 | 875 | 929 | 51 | 17
Full revert allows to get really close to the theoretical maximum
goodput (~949 Mbit/s) with minimal deviation. The new patch, however,
gives less stable numbers, while sometimes hits the maximum as well.
More numbers for the [U]npatched and [R]everted kernels are in the
OpenWrt thread [2].
[1]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/files/12422351/revert-stmmac.patch.txt
[2]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/11676
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index 4727f7be4f86..4b6e5061b5a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -2703,9 +2703,7 @@ static int stmmac_tx_clean(struct stmmac_priv *priv, int budget, u32 queue)
>
> /* We still have pending packets, let's call for a new scheduling */
> if (tx_q->dirty_tx != tx_q->cur_tx)
> - hrtimer_start(&tx_q->txtimer,
> - STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(priv->tx_coal_timer[queue]),
> - HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> + stmmac_tx_timer_arm(priv, queue);
>
> __netif_tx_unlock_bh(netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->dev, queue));
>
> @@ -2987,6 +2985,20 @@ static void stmmac_tx_timer_arm(struct stmmac_priv *priv, u32 queue)
> {
> struct stmmac_tx_queue *tx_q = &priv->dma_conf.tx_queue[queue];
>
> + /*
> + * Note that the hrtimer could expire immediately after we check this,
> + * and the hrtimer and the callers of this function do not share a
> + * lock.
> + *
> + * This should however be safe since the only thing the hrtimer does is
> + * schedule napi (or ask for it run again if it's already running), and
> + * stmmac_tx_clean(), called from the napi poll function, also calls
> + * stmmac_tx_timer_arm() at the end if it sees that there are any TX
> + * packets which have not yet been cleaned.
> + */
> + if (hrtimer_is_queued(&tx_q->txtimer))
> + return;
> +
> hrtimer_start(&tx_q->txtimer,
> STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(priv->tx_coal_timer[queue]),
> HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-20 15:02 [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Use hrtimer for TX coalescing Vincent Whitchurch
2020-11-24 0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-24 4:11 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2020-11-24 16:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-23 20:18 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-08-25 13:42 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-08-25 17:38 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-08-30 14:55 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-08-30 18:05 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy [this message]
2023-09-18 12:56 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-09-19 17:53 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2023-08-30 21:06 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-09-01 11:31 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-09-01 11:53 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-09-08 10:42 ` Vincent Whitchurch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZO-E2_A-UrC9127S@mail.gmail.com \
--to=maxtram95@gmail.com \
--cc=Vincent.Whitchurch@axis.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kernel@axis.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).