netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <Vincent.Whitchurch@axis.com>
Cc: "alexandre.torgue@st.com" <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	"nbd@nbd.name" <nbd@nbd.name>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"joabreu@synopsys.com" <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	"peppe.cavallaro@st.com" <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel <kernel@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Use hrtimer for TX coalescing
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:05:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZO-E2_A-UrC9127S@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3c70b8e345a174817e6a7f38725d958f8193bf1.camel@axis.com>

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 14:55:37 +0000, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> Any test results with this patch on the hardware with the performance
> problems would be appreciated.

TL/DR: it's definitely better than without the patch, but still worse
than fully reverting hrtimer [1].

OpenWrt on Netgear R7800, iperf3 test in both directions (LAN->WAN and
WAN->LAN), 3 runs for the duration of 1 minute each. OpenWrt options
packet_steering (RPS + XPS) and flow_offloading (flowtables) enabled,
irqbalance disabled.

Numbers in Mbit/s, I had to fit the table into 72 characters, so:
U is the original kernel 6.1.46 from OpenWrt, R is reverted hrtimer
(patch [1]), P is patched with the new patch from the previous email,
^ is upload (LAN->WAN), v is download (WAN->LAN).

  |  ^  |  v  |  ^  |  v  |  ^  |  v  | avg ^ | avg v | std ^ | std v
- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----
U | 742 | 709 | 740 | 715 | 556 | 750 |  679  |  725  |  107  |   22
R | 931 | 938 | 935 | 939 | 935 | 939 |  934  |  939  |    2  |    1
P | 845 | 939 | 934 | 939 | 845 | 909 |  875  |  929  |   51  |   17

Full revert allows to get really close to the theoretical maximum
goodput (~949 Mbit/s) with minimal deviation. The new patch, however,
gives less stable numbers, while sometimes hits the maximum as well.

More numbers for the [U]npatched and [R]everted kernels are in the
OpenWrt thread [2].

[1]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/files/12422351/revert-stmmac.patch.txt
[2]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/11676

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index 4727f7be4f86..4b6e5061b5a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -2703,9 +2703,7 @@ static int stmmac_tx_clean(struct stmmac_priv *priv, int budget, u32 queue)
>  
>  	/* We still have pending packets, let's call for a new scheduling */
>  	if (tx_q->dirty_tx != tx_q->cur_tx)
> -		hrtimer_start(&tx_q->txtimer,
> -			      STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(priv->tx_coal_timer[queue]),
> -			      HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> +		stmmac_tx_timer_arm(priv, queue);
>  
>  	__netif_tx_unlock_bh(netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->dev, queue));
>  
> @@ -2987,6 +2985,20 @@ static void stmmac_tx_timer_arm(struct stmmac_priv *priv, u32 queue)
>  {
>  	struct stmmac_tx_queue *tx_q = &priv->dma_conf.tx_queue[queue];
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Note that the hrtimer could expire immediately after we check this,
> +	 * and the hrtimer and the callers of this function do not share a
> +	 * lock.
> +	 *
> +	 * This should however be safe since the only thing the hrtimer does is
> +	 * schedule napi (or ask for it run again if it's already running), and
> +	 * stmmac_tx_clean(), called from the napi poll function, also calls
> +	 * stmmac_tx_timer_arm() at the end if it sees that there are any TX
> +	 * packets which have not yet been cleaned.
> +	 */
> +	if (hrtimer_is_queued(&tx_q->txtimer))
> +		return;
> +
>  	hrtimer_start(&tx_q->txtimer,
>  		      STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(priv->tx_coal_timer[queue]),
>  		      HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-30 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-20 15:02 [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Use hrtimer for TX coalescing Vincent Whitchurch
2020-11-24  0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-24  4:11   ` Vincent Whitchurch
2020-11-24 16:50     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-23 20:18 ` Felix Fietkau
2023-08-25 13:42   ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-08-25 17:38     ` Felix Fietkau
2023-08-30 14:55       ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-08-30 18:05         ` Maxim Mikityanskiy [this message]
2023-09-18 12:56           ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-09-19 17:53             ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2023-08-30 21:06         ` Felix Fietkau
2023-09-01 11:31           ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-09-01 11:53             ` Felix Fietkau
2023-09-08 10:42               ` Vincent Whitchurch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZO-E2_A-UrC9127S@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=maxtram95@gmail.com \
    --cc=Vincent.Whitchurch@axis.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=kernel@axis.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).