From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 net-next 2/2] selftests: fib_test: add a test case for IPv6 source address delete
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 18:14:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZODcQgeILLD51Vf4@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230818082902.1972738-3-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 04:29:02PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Add a test case for IPv6 source address delete.
>
> As David suggested, add tests:
> - Single device using src address
> - Two devices with the same source address
> - VRF with single device using src address
> - VRF with two devices using src address
>
> As Ido points out, in IPv6, the preferred source address is looked up in
> the same VRF as the first nexthop device. This will give us similar results
> to IPv4 if the route is installed in the same VRF as the nexthop device, but
> not when the nexthop device is enslaved to a different VRF. So add tests:
> - src address and nexthop dev in same VR
> - src address and nexthop device in different VRF
>
> The link local address delete logic is different from the global address.
> It should only affect the associate device it bonds to. So add tests cases
> for link local address testing.
>
> Here is the test result:
>
> IPv6 delete address route tests
> Single device using src address
> TEST: Prefsrc removed when src address removed on other device [ OK ]
> Two devices with the same source address
> TEST: Prefsrc not removed when src address exist on other device [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc removed when src address removed on all devices [ OK ]
> VRF with single device using src address
> TEST: Prefsrc removed when src address removed on other device [ OK ]
> VRF with two devices using src address
> TEST: Prefsrc not removed when src address exist on other device [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc removed when src address removed on all devices [ OK ]
> src address and nexthop dev in same VRF
> TEST: Prefsrc removed from VRF when source address deleted [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc in default VRF not removed [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc not removed from VRF when source address exist [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc in default VRF removed [ OK ]
> src address and nexthop device in different VRF
> TEST: Prefsrc not removed from VRF when nexthop dev in diff VRF [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc not removed in default VRF [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc removed from VRF when nexthop dev in diff VRF [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc removed in default VRF [ OK ]
> Table ID 0
> TEST: Prefsrc removed from default VRF when source address deleted [ OK ]
> Link local source route
> TEST: Prefsrc not removed when delete ll addr from other dev [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc removed when delete ll addr [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc not removed when delete ll addr from other dev [ OK ]
> TEST: Prefsrc removed even ll addr still exist on other dev [ OK ]
>
> Tests passed: 19
> Tests failed: 0
>
> Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
> Suggested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-19 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 8:29 [PATCHv7 net-next 0/2] ipv6: update route when delete source address Hangbin Liu
2023-08-18 8:29 ` [PATCHv7 net-next 1/2] ipv6: do not match device when remove source route Hangbin Liu
2023-08-19 0:28 ` David Ahern
2023-08-18 8:29 ` [PATCHv7 net-next 2/2] selftests: fib_test: add a test case for IPv6 source address delete Hangbin Liu
2023-08-19 0:31 ` David Ahern
2023-08-19 15:14 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2023-08-20 18:13 ` [PATCHv7 net-next 0/2] ipv6: update route when delete source address patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZODcQgeILLD51Vf4@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox