From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/9] net: stmmac: xgmac: add more feature parsing from hw cap
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 20:51:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOJuzakni1youMtX@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e55fd03-6b05-46de-874e-01d9cdbf4524@lunn.ch>
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 09:15:06PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:29:19PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > The XGMAC_HWFEAT_GMIISEL bit also indicates whether support 10/100Mbps
> > or not.
>
> The commit message fails to explain the 'Why?' question. GMII does
> normally imply 10/100/1000, so i would expect dma_cap->mbps_1000 also
> implies 10/100/1000? So why also set dma_cap->mbps_10_100?
>
> Maybe a better change would be to modify:
>
> seq_printf(seq, "\t1000 Mbps: %s\n",
> (priv->dma_cap.mbps_1000) ? "Y" : "N");
>
> to actually say 10/100/1000 Mbps? It does not appear this is used for
> anything other than debugfs?
Indeed, it also looks to me like mbps_1000 and mbps_10_100 are only
used to print things in the debugfs file, and do not have any effect
on the driver.
Moreover:
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4.h:#define GMAC_HW_FEAT_GMIISEL BIT(1)
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h:#define DMA_HW_FEAT_GMIISEL 0x00000002 /* 1000 Mbps Support */
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2.h:#define XGMAC_HWFEAT_GMIISEL BIT(1)
Seems to be all the same bit, and:
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4.h:#define GMAC_HW_FEAT_MIISEL BIT(0)
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h:#define DMA_HW_FEAT_MIISEL 0x00000001 /* 10/100 Mbps Support */
So, if everyone defines the first few bits of the hw_cap identically,
is there any point to decoding this separately in each driver? Couldn't
the debugfs "show" function just parse the hw_cap directly? Wouldn't it
make more sense to print MII / GMII rather than 10/100 and 1000 ?
It does bring up one last question though: if the driver makes no use
of these hw_cap bits, then is there any point in printing them in the
debugfs file?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-20 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 15:29 [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] net: stmmac: add new features to xgmac Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-16 15:29 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/9] net: stmmac: correct RX COE parsing for xgmac Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-16 15:29 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/9] net: stmmac: xgmac: add more feature parsing from hw cap Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-20 19:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-08-20 19:51 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2023-08-21 13:25 ` Serge Semin
2023-08-21 13:57 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-08-21 14:41 ` Serge Semin
2023-08-16 15:29 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/9] net: stmmac: enlarge max rx/tx queues and channels to 16 Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-20 19:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-08-16 15:29 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/9] net: stmmac: reflect multi irqs for tx/rx channels and mac and safety Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-16 15:29 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/9] net: stmmac: xgmac: support per-channel irq Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-16 15:29 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/9] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: add safety irq support Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-17 15:37 ` Rob Herring
2023-08-16 15:29 ` [PATCH net-next v4 7/9] net: stmmac: platform: support parsing safety irqs from DT Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-20 19:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-08-16 15:29 ` [PATCH net-next v4 8/9] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: add per channel irq support Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-16 15:29 ` [PATCH net-next v4 9/9] net: stmmac: platform: support parsing per channel irq from DT Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-20 19:29 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZOJuzakni1youMtX@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).