From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714608468 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 20:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00ED0C433C9; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 20:41:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692650509; bh=+U4OxgNPa3HSAdSGG6DU4FYoXSXlX7k75MvbnTIwlr0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FVcItdkU2LEJUwiAkQu0W0zYAi9Jz9Y5AKQO6v4eDivMCCo5PqmQSozMDZYkcVFiV VwQL7kWt2BQQNrWM8ykC8/7q+GCfxStm9GzRd7kurCg8SQj+TlICNKGOjC9jjeOZ3w zrrL1jvVyVhfkGrATI3sTc5DpgILcmz9cE6BCuXGZrrcTZHMtjwdNTK4gRaKzXUyP9 8oZdd7uDSS5n6ilaHjD2Dq84K+KF48RiPRLwYS7tcJNJhvWXWx2XTdUd37hJmIFtpF yqhWaqXFjIqIXsW2/I11SExZzRaYSoNr+WpPXx85j1uP3HoLIGqFbq9A+yEKyKg2jH 2etmSvgx7hdFQ== Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:41:47 -0700 From: Saeed Mahameed To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Leon Romanovsky , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Dima Chumak , Jiri Pirko , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed , Steffen Klassert , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] devlink: Add port function attributes Message-ID: References: <20230817200725.20589529@kernel.org> <20230818041959.GX22185@unreal> <20230818093812.7ede8fbc@kernel.org> <20230818183640.GA22185@unreal> <20230818143240.3960be87@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230818143240.3960be87@kernel.org> On 18 Aug 14:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 21:36:40 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote: >> > and you have to audacity to call the basic rules we had for a very long >> > time "very strange". >> >> This rule relies on basic contract of 1 series -> fast review/acceptance. >> Once fast review/acceptance doesn't happen, what else do you expect from me? > >Since you don't understand what I'm asking please let Saeed post >your patches. > I usually try to avoid posting API changes as part of my pure mlx5 PRs. So they get their fare share of focused review. I prefer if such standalone patchsets to be submitted individually, as they are mostly introducing new devlink knobs. This one isn't a new series hence the V3, so I am not sure I can agree with the parallel submissions issue here. For the two ipsec UDP and TCP selector patches [1] I agree they should've been part of my PRs. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/cover.1691521680.git.leonro@nvidia.com/ I will take them to my next PR. Thanks, Saeed.