netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
Cc: <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>, <bjorn@kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>,
	<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <yhs@fb.com>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
	<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <song@kernel.org>,
	<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	<sdf@google.com>, <haoluo@google.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] selftests/xsk: declare test names in struct
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 14:06:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOiZXIHo1rOt+tNS@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230824122853.3494-6-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 02:28:47PM +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> 
> Declare the test names statically in a struct so that we can refer to
> them when adding the support to execute a single test in the next
> commit. Before this patch, the names of them were not declared in a
> single place which made it not possible to refer to them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 191 +++++++----------------
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h |  37 +----
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> index ee72bb0a8978..b1d0c69f21b8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c

(...)

>  		ksft_test_result_pass("PASS: %s %s%s\n", mode_string(test), busy_poll_string(test),
> @@ -2395,6 +2277,39 @@ static bool is_xdp_supported(int ifindex)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct test_spec tests[] = {
> +	{.name = "SEND_RECEIVE", .test_func = testapp_send_receive},
> +	{.name = "SEND_RECEIVE_2K_FRAME", .test_func = testapp_send_receive_2k_frame},
> +	{.name = "SEND_RECEIVE_SINGLE_PKT", .test_func = testapp_single_pkt},
> +	{.name = "POLL_RX", .test_func = testapp_poll_rx},
> +	{.name = "POLL_TX", .test_func = testapp_poll_tx},
> +	{.name = "POLL_RXQ_FULL", .test_func = testapp_poll_rxq_tmout},
> +	{.name = "POLL_TXQ_FULL", .test_func = testapp_poll_txq_tmout},
> +	{.name = "SEND_RECEIVE_UNALIGNED", .test_func = testapp_send_receive_unaligned},
> +	{.name = "ALIGNED_INV_DESC", .test_func = testapp_aligned_inv_desc},
> +	{.name = "ALIGNED_INV_DESC_2K_FRAME_SIZE", .test_func = testapp_aligned_inv_desc_2k_frame},
> +	{.name = "UNALIGNED_INV_DESC", .test_func = testapp_unaligned_inv_desc},
> +	{.name = "UNALIGNED_INV_DESC_4001_FRAME_SIZE",
> +	 .test_func = testapp_unaligned_inv_desc_4001_frame},
> +	{.name = "UMEM_HEADROOM", .test_func = testapp_headroom},
> +	{.name = "TEARDOWN", .test_func = testapp_teardown},
> +	{.name = "BIDIRECTIONAL", .test_func = testapp_bidirectional},
> +	{.name = "STAT_RX_DROPPED", .test_func = testapp_stats_rx_dropped},
> +	{.name = "STAT_TX_INVALID", .test_func = testapp_stats_tx_invalid_descs},
> +	{.name = "STAT_RX_FULL", .test_func = testapp_stats_rx_full},
> +	{.name = "STAT_FILL_EMPTY", .test_func = testapp_stats_fill_empty},
> +	{.name = "XDP_PROG_CLEANUP", .test_func = testapp_xdp_prog_cleanup},
> +	{.name = "XDP_DROP_HALF", .test_func = testapp_xdp_drop},
> +	{.name = "XDP_METADATA_COPY", .test_func = testapp_xdp_metadata},
> +	{.name = "XDP_METADATA_COPY_MULTI_BUFF", .test_func = testapp_xdp_metadata_mb},
> +	{.name = "SEND_RECEIVE_9K_PACKETS", .test_func = testapp_send_receive_mb},
> +	{.name = "SEND_RECEIVE_UNALIGNED_9K_PACKETS",
> +	 .test_func = testapp_send_receive_unaligned_mb},
> +	{.name = "ALIGNED_INV_DESC_MULTI_BUFF", .test_func = testapp_aligned_inv_desc_mb},
> +	{.name = "UNALIGNED_INV_DESC_MULTI_BUFF", .test_func = testapp_unaligned_inv_desc_mb},
> +	{.name = "TOO_MANY_FRAGS", .test_func = testapp_too_many_frags},
> +};

To others, I was asking on v1 to move this to a header file but i missed
somehow that we also set .test_func here so this would require us to
un-static each and every function which would in turn cause the diffstat
to grow significantly. IOW let us address that later.

> +
>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
>  	struct pkt_stream *rx_pkt_stream_default;
> @@ -2437,7 +2352,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  	init_iface(ifobj_rx, MAC1, MAC2, worker_testapp_validate_rx);
>  	init_iface(ifobj_tx, MAC2, MAC1, worker_testapp_validate_tx);
>  
> -	test_spec_init(&test, ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx, 0);
> +	test_spec_init(&test, ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx, 0, &tests[0]);
>  	tx_pkt_stream_default = pkt_stream_generate(ifobj_tx->umem, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
>  	rx_pkt_stream_default = pkt_stream_generate(ifobj_rx->umem, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
>  	if (!tx_pkt_stream_default || !rx_pkt_stream_default)
> @@ -2446,17 +2361,17 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  	test.rx_pkt_stream_default = rx_pkt_stream_default;
>  
>  	if (opt_mode == TEST_MODE_ALL)
> -		ksft_set_plan(modes * TEST_TYPE_MAX);
> +		ksft_set_plan(modes * ARRAY_SIZE(tests));
>  	else
> -		ksft_set_plan(TEST_TYPE_MAX);
> +		ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(tests));
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < modes; i++) {
>  		if (opt_mode != TEST_MODE_ALL && i != opt_mode)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		for (j = 0; j < TEST_TYPE_MAX; j++) {
> -			test_spec_init(&test, ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx, i);
> -			run_pkt_test(&test, i, j);
> +		for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); j++) {
> +			test_spec_init(&test, ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx, i, &tests[j]);
> +			run_pkt_test(&test);
>  			usleep(USLEEP_MAX);
>  
>  			if (test.fail)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
> index 1412492e9618..3a71d490db3e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>  #define MAX_INTERFACES 2
>  #define MAX_INTERFACE_NAME_CHARS 16
>  #define MAX_SOCKETS 2
> -#define MAX_TEST_NAME_SIZE 32
> +#define MAX_TEST_NAME_SIZE 48
>  #define MAX_TEARDOWN_ITER 10
>  #define PKT_HDR_SIZE (sizeof(struct ethhdr) + 2) /* Just to align the data in the packet */
>  #define MIN_PKT_SIZE 64
> @@ -66,38 +66,6 @@ enum test_mode {
>  	TEST_MODE_ALL
>  };
>  
> -enum test_type {
> -	TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION,
> -	TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_2K_FRAME,
> -	TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_SINGLE_PKT,
> -	TEST_TYPE_RX_POLL,
> -	TEST_TYPE_TX_POLL,
> -	TEST_TYPE_POLL_RXQ_TMOUT,
> -	TEST_TYPE_POLL_TXQ_TMOUT,
> -	TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED,
> -	TEST_TYPE_ALIGNED_INV_DESC,
> -	TEST_TYPE_ALIGNED_INV_DESC_2K_FRAME,
> -	TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_INV_DESC,
> -	TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_INV_DESC_4K1_FRAME,
> -	TEST_TYPE_HEADROOM,
> -	TEST_TYPE_TEARDOWN,
> -	TEST_TYPE_BIDI,
> -	TEST_TYPE_STATS_RX_DROPPED,
> -	TEST_TYPE_STATS_TX_INVALID_DESCS,
> -	TEST_TYPE_STATS_RX_FULL,
> -	TEST_TYPE_STATS_FILL_EMPTY,
> -	TEST_TYPE_BPF_RES,
> -	TEST_TYPE_XDP_DROP_HALF,
> -	TEST_TYPE_XDP_METADATA_COUNT,
> -	TEST_TYPE_XDP_METADATA_COUNT_MB,
> -	TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_MB,
> -	TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_MB,
> -	TEST_TYPE_ALIGNED_INV_DESC_MB,
> -	TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_INV_DESC_MB,
> -	TEST_TYPE_TOO_MANY_FRAGS,
> -	TEST_TYPE_MAX
> -};
> -
>  struct xsk_umem_info {
>  	struct xsk_ring_prod fq;
>  	struct xsk_ring_cons cq;
> @@ -137,8 +105,10 @@ struct pkt_stream {
>  };
>  
>  struct ifobject;
> +struct test_spec;
>  typedef int (*validation_func_t)(struct ifobject *ifobj);
>  typedef void *(*thread_func_t)(void *arg);
> +typedef int (*test_func_t)(struct test_spec *test);
>  
>  struct ifobject {
>  	char ifname[MAX_INTERFACE_NAME_CHARS];
> @@ -180,6 +150,7 @@ struct test_spec {
>  	struct bpf_program *xdp_prog_tx;
>  	struct bpf_map *xskmap_rx;
>  	struct bpf_map *xskmap_tx;
> +	test_func_t test_func;
>  	int mtu;
>  	u16 total_steps;
>  	u16 current_step;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-25 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-24 12:28 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/11] seltests/xsk: various improvements to xskxceiver Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/11] selftests/xsk: print per packet info in verbose mode Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/11] selftests/xsk: add timeout for Tx thread Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/11] selftests/xsk: add option to only run tests in a single mode Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-25 12:02   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-08-25 12:30     ` Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/11] selftests/xsk: move all tests to separate functions Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] selftests/xsk: declare test names in struct Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-25 12:06   ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/11] selftests/xsk: add option that lists all tests Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/11] selftests/xsk: add option to run single test Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-25 12:44   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-08-25 12:50     ` Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/11] selftests/xsk: use ksft_print_msg uniformly Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/11] selftests/xsk: fail single test instead of all tests Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-25 12:48   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/11] selftests/xsk: display command line options with -h Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-25 12:49   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-08-25 12:54     ` Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-25 13:06       ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-08-24 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/11] selftests/xsk: introduce XSKTEST_ETH environment variable Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-25 12:57   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-08-25 13:03     ` Magnus Karlsson
2023-08-25 13:19       ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-08-25 13:34         ` Magnus Karlsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZOiZXIHo1rOt+tNS@boxer \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).