From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] net: phy: micrel: Correct bit assignment for MICREL_KSZ8_P1_ERRATA flag
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:20:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPB3cYMnFq1qGRv0@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230831110427.3551432-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:04:27PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> The previous assignment of the phy_device quirk for the
> MICREL_KSZ8_P1_ERRATA flag was incorrect, working only due to
> coincidental conditions. Specifically:
>
> - The flag MICREL_KSZ8_P1_ERRATA, intended for KSZ88xx switches, was
> mistakenly overlapping with the MICREL_PHY_FXEN and
> MICREL_PHY_50MHZ_CLK flags.
> - MICREL_PHY_FXEN is used by the KSZ8041 PHY, and its related code path
> wasn't executed for KSZ88xx PHYs and other way around.
> - Additionally, the code path associated with the MICREL_PHY_50MHZ_CLK
> flag wasn't executed for KSZ88xx either.
>
> Fixes: 49011e0c1555d ("net: phy: micrel: ksz886x/ksz8081: add cabletest support")
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/micrel_phy.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/micrel_phy.h b/include/linux/micrel_phy.h
> index 8bef1ab62bba3..0cedbeb9167c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/micrel_phy.h
> +++ b/include/linux/micrel_phy.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
> /* struct phy_device dev_flags definitions */
> #define MICREL_PHY_50MHZ_CLK 0x00000001
> #define MICREL_PHY_FXEN 0x00000002
> -#define MICREL_KSZ8_P1_ERRATA 0x00000003
> +#define MICREL_KSZ8_P1_ERRATA BIT(3)
Please can you also convert the other two flags to use BIT() as well to
make the entire thing explicitly bit-orientated? Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-31 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-31 11:04 [PATCH net v1] net: phy: micrel: Correct bit assignment for MICREL_KSZ8_P1_ERRATA flag Oleksij Rempel
2023-08-31 11:20 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2023-08-31 11:23 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-09-01 1:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZPB3cYMnFq1qGRv0@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).