From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4/fib: send RTM_DELROUTE notify when flush fib
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 17:54:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQGG8xqt8m3IHS4z@Laptop-X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc91aa7d-0707-b64f-e7a9-f5ce97d4f313@6wind.com>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 09:58:08AM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 11/09/2023 à 11:50, Thomas Haller a écrit :
> [snip]
> > - the fact that it isn't fixed in more than a decade, shows IMO that
> > getting caching right for routes is very hard. Patches that improve the
> > behavior should not be rejected with "look at libnl3 or FRR".
> +1
>
> I just hit another corner case:
>
> ip link set ntfp2 up
> ip address add 10.125.0.1/24 dev ntfp2
> ip nexthop add id 1234 via 10.125.0.2 dev ntfp2
> ip route add 10.200.0.0/24 nhid 1234
>
> Check the config:
> $ ip route
> <snip>
> 10.200.0.0/24 nhid 1234 via 10.125.0.2 dev ntfp2
> $ ip nexthop
> id 1234 via 10.125.0.2 dev ntfp2 scope link
>
>
> Set the carrier off on ntfp2:
> ip monitor label link route nexthop&
> ip link set ntfp2 carrier off
>
> $ ip link set ntfp2 carrier off
> $ [LINK]4: ntfp2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state
> DOWN group default
> link/ether de:ed:02:67:61:1f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> => No nexthop event nor route event (net.ipv4.nexthop_compat_mode = 1)
>
> 'ip nexthop' and 'ip route' show that the nexthop and the route have been deleted.
>
> If the nexthop infra is not used (ip route add 10.200.0.0/24 via 10.125.0.2 dev
> ntfp2), the route entry is not deleted.
>
> I wondering if it is expected to not have a nexthop event when one is removed
> due to a carrier lost.
> At least, a route event should be generated when the compat_mode is enabled.
This thread goes to a long discussion.
Ido has bringing up this issue[1]. In my patchv2[2] we skipped to send the
notification as it is deliberate.
BTW, I'm still looking into the questions you asked in my IPv6 patch[3]. Sorry
for the late response. I was busy with some other stuff recently.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZLlE5of1Sw1pMPlM@shredder/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230809140234.3879929-3-liuhangbin@gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/bf3bb290-25b7-e327-851a-d6a036daab03@6wind.com/
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-13 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-18 8:00 [PATCH net-next] ipv4/fib: send RTM_DELROUTE notify when flush fib Hangbin Liu
2023-07-18 10:19 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-07-18 10:32 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-07-18 14:45 ` David Ahern
2023-07-18 15:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-07-20 7:51 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-07-20 14:29 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-07-21 1:34 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-07-21 4:01 ` David Ahern
2023-07-21 5:46 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-07-23 7:38 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-07-24 8:56 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-07-24 15:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-07-25 8:20 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-07-25 16:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-07-28 13:01 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2023-07-28 15:42 ` David Ahern
2023-08-02 9:10 ` Thomas Haller
2023-08-08 1:44 ` David Ahern
2023-08-08 18:59 ` Benjamin Poirier
2023-09-11 9:50 ` Thomas Haller
2023-09-13 7:58 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2023-09-13 9:54 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2023-09-13 14:11 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2023-09-13 14:43 ` David Ahern
2023-09-13 14:53 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2023-09-14 15:43 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2023-09-15 3:07 ` David Ahern
2023-09-15 15:54 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2023-09-13 14:41 ` David Ahern
2023-09-15 16:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-07-26 10:17 ` [Questions] Some issues about IPv4/IPv6 nexthop route (was Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4/fib: send RTM_DELROUTE notify when flush fib) Hangbin Liu
2023-07-26 15:57 ` David Ahern
2023-07-27 4:19 ` [Questions] Some issues about IPv4/IPv6 nexthop route Hangbin Liu
2023-07-27 15:35 ` David Ahern
2023-07-27 14:45 ` [Questions] Some issues about IPv4/IPv6 nexthop route (was Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4/fib: send RTM_DELROUTE notify when flush fib) Ido Schimmel
2023-08-28 7:53 ` [Questions] Some issues about IPv4/IPv6 nexthop route Hangbin Liu
2023-08-28 15:06 ` David Ahern
2023-08-29 1:07 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-08-29 1:42 ` David Ahern
2023-08-02 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next] ipv4/fib: send RTM_DELROUTE notify when flush fib Thomas Haller
2023-08-04 8:09 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-08-09 7:06 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-08-09 10:02 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-07-25 14:13 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZQGG8xqt8m3IHS4z@Laptop-X1 \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=bpoirier@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).