From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: sched: cls_u32: Fix allocation size in u32_init()
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 15:19:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZR1maZoAh2W/0Vw6@work> (raw)
commit d61491a51f7e ("net/sched: cls_u32: Replace one-element array
with flexible-array member") incorrecly replaced an instance of
`sizeof(*tp_c)` with `struct_size(tp_c, hlist->ht, 1)`. This results
in a an over-allocation of 8 bytes.
This change is wrong because `hlist` in `struct tc_u_common` is a
pointer:
net/sched/cls_u32.c:
struct tc_u_common {
struct tc_u_hnode __rcu *hlist;
void *ptr;
int refcnt;
struct idr handle_idr;
struct hlist_node hnode;
long knodes;
};
So, the use of `struct_size()` makes no sense: we don't need to allocate
any extra space for a flexible-array member. `sizeof(*tp_c)` is just fine.
So, `struct_size(tp_c, hlist->ht, 1)` translates to:
sizeof(*tp_c) + sizeof(tp_c->hlist->ht) ==
sizeof(struct tc_u_common) + sizeof(struct tc_u_knode *) ==
144 + 8 == 0x98 (byes)
^^^
|
unnecessary extra
allocation size
$ pahole -C tc_u_common net/sched/cls_u32.o
struct tc_u_common {
struct tc_u_hnode * hlist; /* 0 8 */
void * ptr; /* 8 8 */
int refcnt; /* 16 4 */
/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
struct idr handle_idr; /* 24 96 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) was 56 bytes ago --- */
struct hlist_node hnode; /* 120 16 */
/* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 8 bytes ago --- */
long int knodes; /* 136 8 */
/* size: 144, cachelines: 3, members: 6 */
/* sum members: 140, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */
/* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};
And with `sizeof(*tp_c)`, we have:
sizeof(*tp_c) == sizeof(struct tc_u_common) == 144 == 0x90 (bytes)
which is the correct and original allocation size.
Fix this issue by replacing `struct_size(tp_c, hlist->ht, 1)` with
`sizeof(*tp_c)`, and avoid allocating 8 too many bytes.
The following difference in binary output is expected and reflects the
desired change:
| net/sched/cls_u32.o
| @@ -6148,7 +6148,7 @@
| include/linux/slab.h:599
| 2cf5: mov 0x0(%rip),%rdi # 2cfc <u32_init+0xfc>
| 2cf8: R_X86_64_PC32 kmalloc_caches+0xc
|- 2cfc: mov $0x98,%edx
|+ 2cfc: mov $0x90,%edx
Reported-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/09b4a2ce-da74-3a19-6961-67883f634d98@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update subject line.
- Update changelog text.
v1:
- Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/ZN5DvRyq6JNz20l1@work/
net/sched/cls_u32.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_u32.c b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
index da4c179a4d41..6663e971a13e 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_u32.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static int u32_init(struct tcf_proto *tp)
idr_init(&root_ht->handle_idr);
if (tp_c == NULL) {
- tp_c = kzalloc(struct_size(tp_c, hlist->ht, 1), GFP_KERNEL);
+ tp_c = kzalloc(sizeof(*tp_c), GFP_KERNEL);
if (tp_c == NULL) {
kfree(root_ht);
return -ENOBUFS;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-04 13:19 Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2023-10-04 15:16 ` [PATCH v2] net: sched: cls_u32: Fix allocation size in u32_init() Jamal Hadi Salim
2023-10-06 10:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZR1maZoAh2W/0Vw6@work \
--to=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).