From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Cc: Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: pcs: xpcs: Add 2500BASE-X case in get state for XPCS drivers
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:46:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRLuv77VSTXSZSc7@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jhmdppifw4qverxedn6l3bk3tuwyuww7rcvqvtzbxhh5livowv@3jpc4m3kfgno>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 03:09:47PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Hi Russell
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 12:45:47PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 02:39:21PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > Hi Raju
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 01:21:42PM +0530, Raju Lakkaraju wrote:
> > > > Add DW_2500BASEX case in xpcs_get_state( ) to update speed, duplex and pause
> > > > Update the port mode and autonegotiation
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h | 4 ++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > > > index 4dbc21f604f2..4f89dcedf0fc 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > > > @@ -1090,6 +1090,30 @@ static int xpcs_get_state_c37_1000basex(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static int xpcs_get_state_2500basex(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> > > > + struct phylink_link_state *state)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int sts, lpa;
> > > > +
> > > > + sts = xpcs_read(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_MMD_STS);
> > >
> > > > + lpa = xpcs_read(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_MMD_LP_BABL);
> > > > + if (sts < 0 || lpa < 0) {
> > > > + state->link = false;
> > > > + return sts;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > The HW manual says: "The host uses this page to know the link
> > > partner's ability when the base page is received through Clause 37
> > > auto-negotiation." Seeing xpcs_config_2500basex() disables
> > > auto-negotiation and lpa value is unused anyway why do you even need
> > > to read the LP_BABL register?
> >
>
> > Since you have access to the hardware manual, what does it say about
> > clause 37 auto-negotiation when operating in 2500base-X mode?
>
> Here are the parts which mention 37 & SGMII AN in the 2.5G context:
>
> 1. "Clause 37 (& SGMII) auto-negotiation is supported in 2.5G mode if
> the link partner is also operating in the equivalent 2.5G mode."
>
> 2. "During the Clause 37/SGMII as the auto-negotiation link timer
> operates with a faster clock in the 2.5G mode, the timeout duration
> reduces by a factor of 2.5. To restore the standard specified timeout
> period, the respective registers must be re-programmed."
>
> I guess the entire 2.5G-thing understanding could be generalized by
> the next sentence from the HW manual: "The 2.5G mode of operation is
> functionally the same as 1000BASE-X/KX mode, except that the
> clock-rate is 2.5 times the original rate. In this mode, the
> Serdes/PHY operates at a serial baud-rate of 3.125 Gbps and DWC_xpcs
> data-path and the GMII interface to MAC operates at 312.5 MHz (instead
> of 125 MHz)." Thus here is another info regarding AN in that context:
>
> 3. "The DWC_xpcs operates either in 10/100/1000Mbps rate or
> 25/250/2500Mbps rates respectively with SGMII auto-negotiation. The
> DWC_xpcs cannot support switching or negotiation between 1G and 2.5G
> rates using auto-negotiation."
Thanks for the clarification.
So this hardware, just like Marvell hardware, operates 2500BASE-X merely
by up-clocking, and all the features that were available at 1000BASE-X
are also available at 2500BASE-X, including the in-band signalling.
Therefore, I think rather than disabling AN outright, the
PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_* mode passed in should be checked to determine whether
inband should be used or not.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 7:51 [PATCH net-next] net: pcs: xpcs: Add 2500BASE-X case in get state for XPCS drivers Raju Lakkaraju
2023-09-26 11:39 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-26 11:45 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-26 12:09 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-26 14:46 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2023-09-26 15:27 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-26 15:47 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-26 19:40 ` Serge Semin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRLuv77VSTXSZSc7@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).