From: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Aya Levin <ayal@nvidia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: [PATCH net] ipv6: avoid atomic fragment on GSO packets
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:50:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRcOXJ0pkuph6fko@debian.debian> (raw)
GSO packets can contain a trailing segment that is smaller than
gso_size. When examining the dst MTU for such packet, if its gso_size
is too large, then all segments would be fragmented. However, there is a
good chance the trailing segment has smaller actual size than both
gso_size as well as the MTU, which leads to an "atomic fragment".
RFC-8021 explicitly recommend to deprecate such use case. An Existing
report from APNIC also shows that atomic fragments can be dropped
unexpectedly along the path [1].
Add an extra check in ip6_fragment to catch all possible generation of
atomic fragments. Skip atomic header if it is called on a packet no
larger than MTU.
Link: https://www.potaroo.net/presentations/2022-03-01-ipv6-frag.pdf [1]
Fixes: b210de4f8c97 ("net: ipv6: Validate GSO SKB before finish IPv6 processing")
Reported-by: David Wragg <dwragg@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
index 951ba8089b5b..42f5f68a6e24 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
@@ -854,6 +854,13 @@ int ip6_fragment(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
__be32 frag_id;
u8 *prevhdr, nexthdr = 0;
+ /* RFC-8021 recommended atomic fragments to be deprecated. Double check
+ * the actual packet size before fragment it.
+ */
+ mtu = ip6_skb_dst_mtu(skb);
+ if (unlikely(skb->len <= mtu))
+ return output(net, sk, skb);
+
err = ip6_find_1stfragopt(skb, &prevhdr);
if (err < 0)
goto fail;
@@ -861,7 +868,6 @@ int ip6_fragment(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
nexthdr = *prevhdr;
nexthdr_offset = prevhdr - skb_network_header(skb);
- mtu = ip6_skb_dst_mtu(skb);
/* We must not fragment if the socket is set to force MTU discovery
* or if the skb it not generated by a local socket.
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-29 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-29 17:50 Yan Zhai [this message]
2023-09-30 11:08 ` [PATCH net] ipv6: avoid atomic fragment on GSO packets Florian Westphal
2023-10-02 6:52 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-10-02 15:51 ` Yan Zhai
2023-10-02 15:47 ` Yan Zhai
2023-10-02 17:11 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRcOXJ0pkuph6fko@debian.debian \
--to=yan@cloudflare.com \
--cc=ayal@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).