From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: update transport state when processing a dupcook packet
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:07:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRv2BhAVBcR36Ilm@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd17356abe49713ded425250cc1ae51e9f5846c6.1696172325.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 10:58:45AM -0400, Xin Long wrote:
> During the 4-way handshake, the transport's state is set to ACTIVE in
> sctp_process_init() when processing INIT_ACK chunk on client or
> COOKIE_ECHO chunk on server.
>
> In the collision scenario below:
>
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: sctp (1) [INIT] [init tag: 3922216408]
> 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: sctp (1) [INIT] [init tag: 144230885]
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: sctp (1) [INIT ACK] [init tag: 3922216408]
> 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: sctp (1) [COOKIE ECHO]
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: sctp (1) [COOKIE ACK]
> 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: sctp (1) [INIT ACK] [init tag: 3914796021]
>
> when processing COOKIE_ECHO on 192.168.1.2, as it's in COOKIE_WAIT state,
> sctp_sf_do_dupcook_b() is called by sctp_sf_do_5_2_4_dupcook() where it
> creates a new association and sets its transport to ACTIVE then updates
> to the old association in sctp_assoc_update().
>
> However, in sctp_assoc_update(), it will skip the transport update if it
> finds a transport with the same ipaddr already existing in the old asoc,
> and this causes the old asoc's transport state not to move to ACTIVE
> after the handshake.
>
> This means if DATA retransmission happens at this moment, it won't be able
> to enter PF state because of the check 'transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE'
> in sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike().
>
> This patch fixes it by updating the transport in sctp_assoc_update() with
> sctp_assoc_add_peer() where it updates the transport state if there is
> already a transport with the same ipaddr exists in the old asoc.
Hi Xin Long,
I wonder if this warrants a fixes tag, and if so, perhaps:
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-03 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-01 14:58 [PATCH net] sctp: update transport state when processing a dupcook packet Xin Long
2023-10-03 11:07 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-10-05 0:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRv2BhAVBcR36Ilm@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).