From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: update hb timer immediately after users change hb_interval
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:13:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRv3PgGCa5v0woGh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75465785f8ee5df2fb3acdca9b8fafdc18984098.1696172660.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:04:20AM -0400, Xin Long wrote:
> Currently, when hb_interval is changed by users, it won't take effect
> until the next expiry of hb timer. As the default value is 30s, users
> have to wait up to 30s to wait its hb_interval update to work.
>
> This becomes pretty bad in containers where a much smaller value is
> usually set on hb_interval. This patch improves it by resetting the
> hb timer immediately once the value of hb_interval is updated by users.
>
> Note that we don't address the already existing 'problem' when sending
> a heartbeat 'on demand' if one hb has just been sent(from the timer)
> mentioned in:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg590224.html
Hi Xin Long,
I wonder if this warrants a fixes tag, and if so, perhaps:
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-03 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-01 15:04 [PATCH net] sctp: update hb timer immediately after users change hb_interval Xin Long
2023-10-03 11:13 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-10-05 0:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRv3PgGCa5v0woGh@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xufeng.zhang@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).