From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: handle the connecting collision properly in nf_conntrack_proto_sctp
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:44:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRwMwFgCCM3nMeBG@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ee630f777cada3259b29e732e7ea9321a99197b.1696172868.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:07:48AM -0400, Xin Long wrote:
> In Scenario A and B below, as the delayed INIT_ACK always changes the peer
> vtag, SCTP ct with the incorrect vtag may cause packet loss.
>
> Scenario A: INIT_ACK is delayed until the peer receives its own INIT_ACK
>
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: [INIT] [init tag: 1328086772]
> 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: [INIT] [init tag: 1414468151]
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: [INIT ACK] [init tag: 1328086772]
> 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: [INIT ACK] [init tag: 1650211246] *
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: [COOKIE ECHO]
> 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: [COOKIE ECHO]
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: [COOKIE ACK]
>
> Scenario B: INIT_ACK is delayed until the peer completes its own handshake
>
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: sctp (1) [INIT] [init tag: 3922216408]
> 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: sctp (1) [INIT] [init tag: 144230885]
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: sctp (1) [INIT ACK] [init tag: 3922216408]
> 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: sctp (1) [COOKIE ECHO]
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: sctp (1) [COOKIE ACK]
> 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: sctp (1) [INIT ACK] [init tag: 3914796021] *
>
> This patch fixes it as below:
>
> In SCTP_CID_INIT processing:
> - clear ct->proto.sctp.init[!dir] if ct->proto.sctp.init[dir] &&
> ct->proto.sctp.init[!dir]. (Scenario E)
> - set ct->proto.sctp.init[dir].
>
> In SCTP_CID_INIT_ACK processing:
> - drop it if !ct->proto.sctp.init[!dir] && ct->proto.sctp.vtag[!dir] &&
> ct->proto.sctp.vtag[!dir] != ih->init_tag. (Scenario B, Scenario C)
> - drop it if ct->proto.sctp.init[dir] && ct->proto.sctp.init[!dir] &&
> ct->proto.sctp.vtag[!dir] != ih->init_tag. (Scenario A)
>
> In SCTP_CID_COOKIE_ACK processing:
> - clear ct->proto.sctp.init[dir] and ct->proto.sctp.init[!dir]. (Scenario D)
>
> Also, it's important to allow the ct state to move forward with cookie_echo
> and cookie_ack from the opposite dir for the collision scenarios.
>
> There are also other Scenarios where it should allow the packet through,
> addressed by the processing above:
>
> Scenario C: new CT is created by INIT_ACK.
>
> Scenario D: start INIT on the existing ESTABLISHED ct.
>
> Scenario E: start INIT after the old collision on the existing ESTABLISHED ct.
>
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: sctp (1) [INIT] [init tag: 3922216408]
> 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: sctp (1) [INIT] [init tag: 144230885]
> (both side are stopped, then start new connection again in hours)
> 192.168.1.2 > 192.168.1.1: sctp (1) [INIT] [init tag: 242308742]
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Hi,
as a fix I wonder if this warrants a Fixes tag.
Perhaps our old friend:
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-03 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-01 15:07 [PATCH nf] netfilter: handle the connecting collision properly in nf_conntrack_proto_sctp Xin Long
2023-10-02 14:59 ` Xin Long
2023-10-02 15:18 ` Florian Westphal
2023-10-02 15:39 ` Xin Long
2023-10-02 16:48 ` Florian Westphal
2023-10-03 12:44 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-10-03 12:51 ` Simon Horman
2023-10-03 14:17 ` Xin Long
2023-10-03 14:23 ` Florian Westphal
2023-10-03 14:37 ` Xin Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRwMwFgCCM3nMeBG@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).