From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0A6807 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 01:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7113AF; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 18:31:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-452749f6c47so832460137.1; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 18:31:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696383091; x=1696987891; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cV+BD3Itq4BhCRKPqTWiBEJr03DwuwhyYqtmmv79ESo=; b=G3mIOH7lIRS7RSIElh4st2pGyWz//e8YWlKlKPlyLFp4SRm9RpH7aQHQgE5n+Pqm2H NGbXx/sxseUsb8pPfB9P1xl67wmHy78joNLHirqp9+ilvexiAAX9sOEOyjsBSAsctQk4 8GCxQdltR5l8xRydUGzj8CcGHtupCLYvCcvzCOEQ3IPAJoRuqrpK+l8AViy1Cgf2bPWR DHtMGUOWPoneUWLpC/gDTFsW2Qc38MTZ02Updf1Dig8PVDAjc81dcvduI3+WGtkez7cL WZPqHNk071HSP6x4IyYMZvn88hcl7AcvZHvT5B/+WpDHpJbU0bavH33PEPkqjxc6dsGM 4zLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696383091; x=1696987891; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cV+BD3Itq4BhCRKPqTWiBEJr03DwuwhyYqtmmv79ESo=; b=SPskSCW8sxE1kPkJoi6v72axO9EPik0PI9Ujc0r+bRbiiuatJTsvTuoczwTjmwCluJ 7JOoLFeSPxjj0jexTdaqKaHlLTlhSB20ol8oNPuyf31XIrWieyptgWlvjoarR24Ffudl mb6LYIgmFM2rFZcBomDSJaqtECiqaNsE7DysL0TTYncWF326XFDHGcN8+ONKKUmqONx4 Bz18978O2LyANgnR8Vo9c7jd12VrsmKI3Ud+kYQRvvRtKhRmWZ8vZSI8b0IG3oQ8jIit pAt9WcA4ri9XhE3dB+puSr8GQ8GSVBeyEtJCSuBez2uA/NRIYrl5Vn310jOn4boBUk7q mhQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy8MuS5J0ifpF73jPZ3OckkdRiMvhdT+cOpnb9RdirwGjh7k0ZB dryqFUdRuR4IT7UxfOP0MlHDuYOr8OY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGeMBp6m0rTIjRjsfd6YmID2UUcreTdFzgykDkyk+nBYzn3upz1wYDiVgyaAg8QD0xn8mp6ig== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:14d:b0:452:bfe3:8941 with SMTP id a13-20020a056102014d00b00452bfe38941mr955351vsr.21.1696383090722; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 18:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2607:fb90:bea0:d290:37ee:5c3d:1002:8e75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b20-20020ab00854000000b007ab975b8eb9sm373678uaf.10.2023.10.03.18.31.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Oct 2023 18:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 18:31:28 -0700 From: Yury Norov To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan , Valentin Schneider , Maher Sanalla , Ingo Molnar , Mel Gorman , Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Pawel Chmielewski , Jacob Keller , Yury Norov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: mellanox: drop mlx5_cpumask_default_spread() Message-ID: References: <20230925020528.777578-1-yury.norov@gmail.com> <20230925020528.777578-2-yury.norov@gmail.com> <2fd12c42d3dd60b2e9b56e9f7dd37d5f994fd9ac.camel@redhat.com> <20231003152030.6615437c@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231003152030.6615437c@kernel.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 03:20:30PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 06:46:17 -0700 Yury Norov wrote: > > Can you elaborate on the conflicts you see? For me it applies cleanly > > on current master, and with some 3-way merging on latest -next... > > We're half way thru the release cycle the conflicts can still come in. > > There's no dependency for the first patch. The most normal way to > handle this would be to send patch 1 to the networking tree and send > the rest in the subsequent merge window. Ah, I understand now. I didn't plan to move it in current merge window. In fact, I'll be more comfortable to keep it in -next for longer and merge it in v6.7. But it's up to you. If you think it's better, I can resend 1st patch separately. Thanks, Yury