From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B9B3F4ED for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 06:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="KrXGlOnC" Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70BCB94 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c17de836fbso82631171fa.1 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:04:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1697004269; x=1697609069; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XLcMO6tCvEayfczTS0N9hdUJJuOrTWwhHyFzgaVwZn4=; b=KrXGlOnCEpVTWcDsXatte8CfI140KWpbiWN/2vBPZddVe1kl/8jIfgXGo1dAr8ke3U Cf8B0pc6Al8U4iNWe+e7QgTZvdR/Dt2u7BzcQ9PHIxK6nrKjnE0qVqsRPXk7QzVyObF+ V/wN4Kr5jvdnh7Nsnn69b5Z/5bJ3hZAF0KCHi17Wq8neb6Wl0X9VloYo5YLz3IzaHKqT N99vCb/GTYLcdPW0OWQb4YUkh4ws7DiKp4nC/xIvExfw0lm+RgCElcbed01DUnp7hWkB H0ZBKNT/E2G46f3Rzp6P3R7bpiuO5IfUIrxC+NHXFFa/4hsYgzqrhuuNnnf+D0u0FVXf 758g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697004269; x=1697609069; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=XLcMO6tCvEayfczTS0N9hdUJJuOrTWwhHyFzgaVwZn4=; b=PtuWPqaEZhQXYVox1FfdPXfcDS+KzGIyy+8BHq2XMbE28B4d0UNEEcQJQT5jEeN8yh aDEaqXUWAoiJcnkYhVz8Ua/4Wt7f3863ECsMBfB4rhMa9VwE55APkmvlptuxlXlCAZii DPcyNFoqSvvItfCwW8R4mMDb6AJcN5hz+IcUNoH6vMA+7LbTMXDqMvUYs4JN3WsDf1Gj tUxOfjGDPvjgawEa1coEcZZ5l0cLApXJevOD4uWXsEkvVAyggEXgH8/oBTIpXD2euWt4 GLPPJi6h6AMtmTmieXTCQ0/oZFbREmRdsGrmETPvY2kWKr4leK1HKWu2lgLpGVadExuU c8yQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxqwWQibN9M2xk741Ej0x7QCpoeFaw0dzgAd+DQt0RTnYiAjirn TEENMUTaquBw4x1qAaLCF2fEMA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFz6pqAjvf8mSXUjVojcq7g3QjTibwN65Mxi56SdMelQyAIboAXJ7Vm/aMkiwrzM5oCl4tJmQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:31d0:b0:4ff:a04c:8a5b with SMTP id j16-20020a05651231d000b004ffa04c8a5bmr20964704lfe.47.1697004269544; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (host-213-179-129-39.customer.m-online.net. [213.179.129.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4-20020a05600c248400b004060f0a0fd5sm15756721wms.13.2023.10.10.23.04.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 08:04:27 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net Subject: Re: [patch net-next 05/10] netlink: specs: devlink: fix reply command values Message-ID: References: <20231010110828.200709-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20231010110828.200709-6-jiri@resnulli.us> <20231010115935.58b4b2ea@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231010115935.58b4b2ea@kernel.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 08:59:35PM CEST, kuba@kernel.org wrote: >On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:08:24 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: >> From: Jiri Pirko >> >> Make sure that the command values used for replies are correct. This is >> only affecting generated userspace helpers, no change on kernel code. > >Still, I think this needs net. It affects only userspace generated code, that's why I didn't bother. If you insist, I can send separate patch to net.