From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CCFCD2F0 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 06:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="XRXMBZH6" Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD52898 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:10:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-99de884ad25so1145517766b.3 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:10:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1697004632; x=1697609432; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jm0uZxHMOJmgYhkcGqxg/YI4JPoYQgTRWeNJzX7sTQY=; b=XRXMBZH689s6SE9BSAfEej4SPEKn7R7smWO/dHY7U8z5K1C4xq8qoxSHtYcWF3bRgk ObxAEfuUywsfq9EhjNjmXU7AN3J8FekE9Y0GsSTA0VmMHmsBrsH6+xCIJyDAtosHUIPY 8C8oRxRFgpY4DkypRoN82f6rBrTdueUJinEC74ZIJRcMUL62ZItnqvCvTj5BmDfyidRQ P7ZMS4ovZ+MU6abdMR1aNBpdH7fNbV8MBT8sF5IwiRMxRTw2OlOnEWAAtdtJdzUFKslb vIii7VBr4nHxt5dSnaOQBYvGfKJuREZLtFupSG7zJZrD3bkYDGwa3oCw0PZyoTiz4hjh q32Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697004632; x=1697609432; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=jm0uZxHMOJmgYhkcGqxg/YI4JPoYQgTRWeNJzX7sTQY=; b=ImTbQLfO7ByaeYjP4RAcSHnkHF0vlbqvKIEmssYi4i2WLSwPuilL7xe29Gyo/w7htI lvdxEBLYhkMAKz2vKZglCXUaPISYMjNNMEPPJk/NKcH/cNpP1VYjAxZwFKBIB+TLkTXR etaKBTRmGQJJdml0Wq4z8HKdNAb8TOyCfXgrr4cW25pQBIwoUwOcBF8SkjGCos7AmRjJ 21t/CjMeNm6NJmM3z2rOrXw4Ao9h13S/snCTY9trYyFKnm6vbRyzZng13+1V/fqJI/iY vrSm31LwF6lYHy7HjQa+YHy0GLugqpTXmZC+D6dLs48MVle2KbLd3aGtQIgGXedVT2yL 3kfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YweAt7Wc7DVGqX87xAcycpuUW6AEiCiKyFYLJlPRq+0I5oTLhyN kEFgpGPOV5dSVCqp227Ti7mpDxA6IUzmjgJkcoI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG/5kAacXk8hMU4fXeMHZnvoZcmqwE+ONbjMm0k5toxvvJoE90y7mU2w6p5bHwowmaa18iXKg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2249:b0:9ae:5ba3:9d8f with SMTP id 9-20020a170906224900b009ae5ba39d8fmr18593920ejr.17.1697004632136; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (host-213-179-129-39.customer.m-online.net. [213.179.129.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lu20-20020a170906fad400b0099bcd1fa5b0sm9347842ejb.192.2023.10.10.23.10.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 08:10:30 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 0/3] devlink: don't take instance lock for nested handle put Message-ID: References: <20231010091323.195451-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20231010121015.5d9bb45d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231010121015.5d9bb45d@kernel.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:10:15PM CEST, kuba@kernel.org wrote: >On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:13:20 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: >> From: Jiri Pirko >> >> Lockdep reports following issue: > >Weren't you complaining about people posting stuff before discussion >is over in the past? :) Sure, but it isn't? I believe that this fix is needed regardless of the A->B objects lifetime. If I'm missing something, sorry about that.