From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB7A1C14E for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 05:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="Fga9VmEi" Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2608410C9 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:12:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c5071165d5so648891fa.0 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:12:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1698297119; x=1698901919; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d20Gh1Exh5bv9OwkK+0lMw7nEOWG7pHF6U/RfMyi/xg=; b=Fga9VmEiQ2ckfdQ+JJLZrvPK7Hm3SWrW+i0xEGT5t6D+ed3ZZLaq1EvApQsY8IdMfF UHwoaY1Yjt4qmUJU7JR02dX4Fbm3zOiUeAoIzzAvnN0Vz7pei4iccTnkuXgI/p8TtNMy x4R3R6LuNWRwlEcAb6ZVH27PkFw6MVLX2fJiqYmtnmt6W6j/LSTvOOOg80ff83fILjDA iuXzpOkURyAnaIBTXm5TPU9ghZrPE+yrFDeVM12N2e5MYPLPZtp+QSTaTeMVP8r2m/7p F8M2FEG+jUE3NpuP4tGAR2fT/HFnGLrTdHL0WIsBcgwpU7eNHK7mhEvd4DRC9NfGrDud 3a1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698297119; x=1698901919; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d20Gh1Exh5bv9OwkK+0lMw7nEOWG7pHF6U/RfMyi/xg=; b=tuVx8gFFY9SelJTj/ybRbuGJqFJO/zU+QjDu8HhTdSet5Qs7un4AfxaoDQj1HvRQzD Z8TW1c6etwIdtiCvwf72qrZHdl7rmlRuQaVXHJILEE7KgbZVT6sd0FoPAJtSU0uKCE6a BW5cUEKbkoLC9zTNGTxOT9pUOlVCp1DTt30/ebd5XCf3SV6HcRbsUZBwUuZmgJzsEZUv pIFk38/XI9/p7R9Afsc7cKUApTG2rNx8KaQL4rtOBrhDiMxEX/qgsu6ScXoI4UeEO277 mrN5UgglM4mQvxUfx/KobXHF52egtGS1OUHJKJkCcRX9t8rhO9jHRNbVFeN7R4OqMTve wd7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YybdN9+/u0J0fepr10IorHDt19rJT4izBPUyU3WIYdo5daEd9DN SWFcAePWFD0krznU1YrWt9VhrA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH8piZeWgRJm4y/kUeFvF4KlExbc0JdL1mZZnKtqoN918gz2utYpRh5Ypdp/L74NPptwxas4w== X-Received: by 2002:a19:914a:0:b0:507:9b4a:21c0 with SMTP id y10-20020a19914a000000b005079b4a21c0mr11587032lfj.42.1698297119130; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([80.95.114.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y16-20020a056402135000b005333922efb0sm10604849edw.78.2023.10.25.22.11.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 07:11:44 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: Alex Henrie Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jbohac@suse.cz, benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org, davem@davemloft.net, hideaki.yoshifuji@miraclelinux.com, dsahern@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: ipv6/addrconf: clamp preferred_lft to the maximum allowed Message-ID: References: <20231024212312.299370-1-alexhenrie24@gmail.com> <20231024212312.299370-2-alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 06:28:00PM CEST, alexhenrie24@gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >> Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:23:07PM CEST, alexhenrie24@gmail.com wrote: >> >Without this patch, there is nothing to stop the preferred lifetime of a >> >temporary address from being greater than its valid lifetime. If that >> >was the case, the valid lifetime was effectively ignored. >> > >> >> Sounds like a bugfix, correct? In that case, could you please >> provide a proper Fixes tag and target -net tree? > >Paolo requested no Fixes tag, and Jakub seemed to agree: > >https://lore.kernel.org/all/60d9d5f57fdb55a27748996d807712c680c4e7f9.camel@redhat.com/ Okay, makes sense. Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko