From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA4618E1C for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 13:40:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ferroamp-se.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@ferroamp-se.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="jNDzF46E" Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BCFD134 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-507e85ebf50so1103554e87.1 for ; Thu, 02 Nov 2023 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ferroamp-se.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1698932414; x=1699537214; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OOtIHpfkZWFD4FolYlTiy9O+zTRxXyJ2ArxW0gbuYoU=; b=jNDzF46EHaPtjM7F+yC3uf0jsYEwkVGjhFOdq1CI61LoQiwz6YaAB9n3ZBOFF4AqM/ iXYclFMIixO/vq296kmOz4LEF3dH4Jc77fNb933X/83tvPy8ATSZrV8+jn4ztdJSM51r qnxwVgX5NA1IMiiKR6ILwHWY9OjiLkc7mIINDD6UMz6oV7eKerYHCixOLeRFbzZGMV0x wRrsVYi2VSQBAoF6feBbXxGqu6PYCqO8JxF/f1pRNjzTJQNPA0FXToRMwWBC0p0O9efS EdjzDM1Q7Vs6FBxXzDOFkvMLBinMTfWADvN5PZEcPY4BOepFmF6i2j2KJVab9jBdLrzi Vxog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698932414; x=1699537214; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=OOtIHpfkZWFD4FolYlTiy9O+zTRxXyJ2ArxW0gbuYoU=; b=C4aduKof2mqZErCHnaicz5OTNbei05TChYGvlUlAtqNwB2o/YJGQvBznrI851wlZWS ViYBqSCSH/TJGpo51DM6zNDmCiLwsR3yUyQjvKkLCVJvaUZmUH1pvdtIEBc6CHqct9y2 WHAOQHxLF+k6GKpAV2eJCNyT6S1NIGA/ACd4d5K1hKjEN6lwEuU8em5Aq+pvuyZJ/wSx 9gjkjKdGX8OdlGdlklrddBXPt5n3ppqaeZwlOUKFOSrfyfh/ChLjL6anyvc8+0mtgGjg sS77xuNgbZ9vVz5rcmpkl5HjZgQTgo/V7nAg88y1zqAs4wn+7tLPdppm92OyetlNN1bT T8AQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzfQCTi7cOXRgbbaBQBnCwdD6gytc7h5NzO6ATQJwxMGnFCD7iN R/IPYVy7oj08dRNbrmLx03E0hw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH9Avz4EYkMCVl7IjoVxQZahZVqhEUFxHwUDK/D9DIgwUFD/AoZz+TDzj2dpvUUpDkrMWy0jQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:118d:b0:503:3816:c42c with SMTP id g13-20020a056512118d00b005033816c42cmr16625497lfr.41.1698932414453; Thu, 02 Nov 2023 06:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([185.117.107.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s18-20020a056512203200b00502a7a7579bsm495204lfs.216.2023.11.02.06.40.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 Nov 2023 06:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 14:40:11 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ram=F3n?= Nordin Rodriguez To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Parthiban Veerasooran , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, steen.hegelund@microchip.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, horms@kernel.org, casper.casan@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, horatiu.vultur@microchip.com, Woojung.Huh@microchip.com, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Thorsten.Kummermehr@microchip.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] microchip: lan865x: add driver support for Microchip's LAN865X MACPHY Message-ID: References: <20231023154649.45931-1-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com> <20231023154649.45931-9-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Andrew > > spi-max-frequency = <50000000>; > > That is a pretty high frequency. It is actually running at that speed? I have not verified that we're actually hitting 50M. > > Have you tried lower speed? Sorry for being too brief about the things I've tested. But yes, I've tested running at 15MHz with the same or similar enough results that I've not been able to discern any difference. Meaningful to mention here as well would be that I've tested with and without DMA as well. > > With this setup I'm getting a maximum throughput of about 90kB/s. > > If I increase the chunk size / oa-cps to 64 I get a might higher > > throughput ~900kB/s, but after 0-2s I get dump below (or similar). > > Is this tcp traffic? Lost packets will have a big impact. You might > want to look at the link peer with tcpdump and look for retries. Also, > look if there are frames with bad checksums. > As you assume, this was with TCP. I'll do a run with tcpdump and see if I can compile any intelligent statistics from that.