From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [net 09/15] net/mlx5e: Forbid devlink reload if IPSec rules are offloaded
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 10:13:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZV3GSeNC0Pe3ubhB@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231122014804.27716-10-saeed@kernel.org>
Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 02:47:58AM CET, saeed@kernel.org wrote:
>From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
>
>When devlink reload, mlx5 IPSec module can't be safely cleaned up if
>there is any IPSec rule offloaded, so forbid it in this condition.
>
>Fixes: edd8b295f9e2 ("Merge branch 'mlx5-ipsec-packet-offload-support-in-eswitch-mode'")
>Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
>Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
>---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h | 2 ++
> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
>index 3e064234f6fe..8925e87a3ed5 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
>@@ -157,6 +157,11 @@ static int mlx5_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>
>+ if (mlx5_eswitch_mode_is_blocked(dev)) {
>+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "reload is unsupported if IPSec rules are configured");
That sounds a bit odd to me to be honest. Is pci device unbind forbidden
if ipsec rules are present too? This should be gracefully handled
instead of forbid.
>+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+ }
>+
> if (mlx5_core_is_pf(dev) && pci_num_vf(pdev))
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "reload while VFs are present is unfavorable");
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>index b674b57d05aa..88524c2a4355 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>@@ -846,6 +846,7 @@ void mlx5_eswitch_unblock_encap(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
>
> int mlx5_eswitch_block_mode(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
> void mlx5_eswitch_unblock_mode(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
>+bool mlx5_eswitch_mode_is_blocked(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
>
> static inline int mlx5_eswitch_num_vfs(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
> {
>@@ -947,6 +948,7 @@ static inline void mlx5_eswitch_unblock_encap(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>
> static inline int mlx5_eswitch_block_mode(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) { return 0; }
> static inline void mlx5_eswitch_unblock_mode(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) {}
>+static inline bool mlx5_eswitch_mode_is_blocked(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) { return false; }
> static inline bool mlx5_eswitch_block_ipsec(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> {
> return false;
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>index bf78eeca401b..85c2a20e68fa 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>@@ -3693,6 +3693,21 @@ void mlx5_eswitch_unblock_mode(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> up_write(&esw->mode_lock);
> }
>
>+bool mlx5_eswitch_mode_is_blocked(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>+{
>+ struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = dev->priv.eswitch;
>+ bool blocked;
>+
>+ if (!mlx5_esw_allowed(esw))
>+ return false;
>+
>+ down_write(&esw->mode_lock);
>+ blocked = esw->offloads.num_block_mode;
>+ up_write(&esw->mode_lock);
>+
>+ return blocked;
>+}
>+
> int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u16 mode,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
>--
>2.42.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-22 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-22 1:47 [pull request][net 00/15] mlx5 fixes 2023-11-21 Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:47 ` [net 01/15] net/mlx5e: Honor user choice of IPsec replay window size Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:47 ` [net 02/15] net/mlx5e: Ensure that IPsec sequence packet number starts from 1 Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:47 ` [net 03/15] net/mlx5e: Unify esw and normal IPsec status table creation/destruction Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:47 ` [net 04/15] net/mlx5e: Remove exposure of IPsec RX flow steering struct Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:47 ` [net 05/15] net/mlx5e: Add IPsec and ASO syndromes check in HW Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:47 ` [net 06/15] net/mlx5e: Tidy up IPsec NAT-T SA discovery Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:47 ` [net 07/15] net/mlx5e: Reduce eswitch mode_lock protection context Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:47 ` [net 08/15] net/mlx5e: Check the number of elements before walk TC rhashtable Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:47 ` [net 09/15] net/mlx5e: Forbid devlink reload if IPSec rules are offloaded Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 9:13 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-11-22 9:35 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-11-22 9:50 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-11-22 11:28 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-11-22 12:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-11-23 3:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-23 6:12 ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-23 18:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-11-28 12:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-11-28 16:08 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-11-29 14:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-12-04 17:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-12-05 9:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-11-22 1:47 ` [net 10/15] net/mlx5e: Disable IPsec offload support if not FW steering Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:48 ` [net 11/15] net/mlx5e: Fix possible deadlock on mlx5e_tx_timeout_work Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:48 ` [net 12/15] net/mlx5e: TC, Don't offload post action rule if not supported Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:48 ` [net 13/15] net/mlx5: Nack sync reset request when HotPlug is enabled Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:48 ` [net 14/15] net/mlx5e: Check netdev pointer before checking its net ns Saeed Mahameed
2023-11-22 1:48 ` [net 15/15] net/mlx5: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZV3GSeNC0Pe3ubhB@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox